Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗良性和低级别恶性胰腺肿瘤:一项倾向评分匹配研究。

Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2255-2264. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07639-9. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of open and robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (ODP and RDP) for benign and low-grade malignant tumors.

METHODS

The patients who underwent RDP and ODP for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors at our center were included. After PSM at a 1:1 ratio, the perioperative variations in the two cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

After 1:1 PSM, 219 cases of RDP and ODP were recorded. The RDP cohort showed advantages in the operative duration [120 (90-150) min vs 175 (130-210) min, P < 0.001], estimated blood loss [50 (30-175) ml vs 200 (100-300) ml, P < 0.001], spleen preservation rate (63.5% vs 26.5%, P < 0.001), infection rate (4.6% vs 12.3%, P = 0.006), and gastrointestinal function recovery [3 (2-4) vs. 3 (3-5), P = 0.019]. There were no significant differences in postoperative pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying. Multivariate analysis showed that RDP (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16-0.36, P < 0.001), age (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.03, P = 0.033), tumor size (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.17-1.40, P < 0.001), pathological inflammatory neoplasm type (HR 5.12; 95% CI 2.22-11.81, P < 0.001), and estimated blood loss (HR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001-1.004, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of spleen preservation; RDP (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.17-0.43, P < 0.001), age (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.03, P = 0.022), elevated CA 19-9 level (HR 2.55; 95% CI 1.02-6.39, P = 0.046), tumor size (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.29-1.61, P < 0.001), pathological inflammatory neoplasm type (HR 4.48; 95% CI 1.69-11.85, P = 0.003), and estimated blood loss (HR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001-1.004, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of spleen preservation with the Kimura technique.

CONCLUSION

RDP has advantages in the operative time, blood loss, spleen preservation, infection rate, and gastrointestinal function recovery over ODP in treating benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors. The robotic-assisted approach was an independent predictor of spleen preservation and use of the Kimura technique.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较开腹和机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术(ODP 和 RDP)治疗良性和低级别恶性肿瘤的短期结果。

方法

纳入在我院行 RDP 和 ODP 治疗良性或低级别胰腺肿瘤的患者。经 1:1 倾向评分匹配后,比较两组患者的围手术期差异。

结果

1:1 倾向评分匹配后,共记录 219 例 RDP 和 ODP 病例。RDP 组在手术时间[120(90-150)min 比 175(130-210)min,P<0.001]、估计出血量[50(30-175)ml 比 200(100-300)ml,P<0.001]、脾脏保留率(63.5%比 26.5%,P<0.001)、感染率(4.6%比 12.3%,P=0.006)和胃肠功能恢复[3(2-4)比 3(3-5),P=0.019]方面具有优势。术后胰瘘、术后出血和胃排空延迟无显著差异。多因素分析显示,RDP(HR 0.24;95%CI 0.16-0.36,P<0.001)、年龄(HR 1.02;95%CI 1.00-1.03,P=0.033)、肿瘤大小(HR 1.28;95%CI 1.17-1.40,P<0.001)、病理炎症性肿瘤类型(HR 5.12;95%CI 2.22-11.81,P<0.001)和估计出血量(HR 1.003;95%CI 1.001-1.004,P<0.001)是脾脏保留的独立预测因素;RDP(HR 0.27;95%CI 0.17-0.43,P<0.001)、年龄(HR 1.02;95%CI 1.00-1.03,P=0.022)、CA19-9 水平升高(HR 2.55;95%CI 1.02-6.39,P=0.046)、肿瘤大小(HR 1.44;95%CI 1.29-1.61,P<0.001)、病理炎症性肿瘤类型(HR 4.48;95%CI 1.69-11.85,P=0.003)和估计出血量(HR 1.003;95%CI 1.001-1.004,P<0.001)是 Kimura 技术脾脏保留的独立预测因素。

结论

RDP 治疗良性和低级别恶性胰腺肿瘤在手术时间、出血量、脾脏保留率、感染率和胃肠功能恢复方面优于 ODP。机器人辅助方法是脾脏保留和 Kimura 技术使用的独立预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee5b/8057962/3ce2629ee7f6/464_2020_7639_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验