• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏死亡后潜在供体死亡时间的预测模型(DCD III):一项多中心前瞻性观察队列研究的方案

Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

作者信息

Kotsopoulos Angela M M, Vos Piet, Jansen Nichon E, Bronkhorst Ewald M, van der Hoeven Johannes G, Abdo Wilson F

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Department of Intensive Care, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jun 23;9(6):e16733. doi: 10.2196/16733.

DOI:10.2196/16733
PMID:32459638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7380979/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is a major source of organs for transplantation. A potential cDCD donor poses considerable challenges in terms of identification of those dying within the predefined time frame of warm ischemia after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) to circulatory arrest. Several attempts have been made to develop models predicting the time between treatment withdrawal and circulatory arrest. This time window determines whether organ donation can occur and influences the quality of the donated organs. However, the selected patients used for these models were not always restricted to potential cDCD donors (eg, patients with cancer or severe infections were also included). This severely limits the generalizability of those data.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study are the following: (1) to develop a model predicting time to death within 60 minutes in potential cDCD patients; (2) to validate and update previous prediction models on time to death after WLST; (3) to determine timing and patient characteristics that are associated with prognostication and the decision-making process that leads to initiating end-of-life care; (4) to evaluate the impact of timing of family approach on organ donation approval; and (5) to assess the influence of variation in WLST processes on postmortem organ donor potential and actual postmortem organ donors.

METHODS

In this multicenter observational prospective cohort study, all patients admitted to the intensive care unit of 3 university hospitals and 3 teaching hospitals who met the criteria of the cDCD protocol as defined by the Dutch Transplant Foundation were included. The target of enrolment was set to 400 patients. Previously developed models will be refitted in our data set. To further update previous prediction models, we will apply least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) as a tool for efficient variable selection to develop the multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

This protocol was funded in August 2014 by the Dutch Transplant Foundation. We expect to have the results of this study in July 2020. Patient enrolment was completed in July 2018 and data collection was completed in April 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will provide a robust multimodal prediction model, based on clinical and physiological parameters, that can predict time to circulatory arrest in cDCD donors. In addition, it will add valuable insight in the process of WLST in cDCD donors and will fill an important knowledge gap in this essential field of health care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04123275; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04123275.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/16733.

摘要

背景

心脏死亡后器官捐献(cDCD)是移植器官的主要来源。潜在的cDCD供体在确定那些在撤除维持生命治疗(WLST)至循环停止的预定义热缺血时间范围内死亡的患者方面带来了相当大的挑战。已经进行了几次尝试来开发预测治疗撤除与循环停止之间时间的模型。这个时间窗口决定了是否可以进行器官捐献,并影响所捐献器官的质量。然而,用于这些模型的选定患者并不总是局限于潜在的cDCD供体(例如,还包括患有癌症或严重感染的患者)。这严重限制了这些数据的普遍性。

目的

本研究的目的如下:(1)开发一个预测潜在cDCD患者60分钟内死亡时间的模型;(2)验证和更新先前关于WLST后死亡时间的预测模型;(3)确定与预后以及导致启动临终关怀的决策过程相关的时间和患者特征;(4)评估家属介入时间对器官捐献批准的影响;(5)评估WLST过程变化对死后器官供体潜力和实际死后器官供体的影响。

方法

在这项多中心观察性前瞻性队列研究中,纳入了3所大学医院和3所教学医院重症监护病房收治的所有符合荷兰移植基金会定义的cDCD方案标准的患者。入组目标设定为400名患者。先前开发的模型将在我们的数据集中重新拟合。为了进一步更新先前的预测模型,我们将应用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)作为有效变量选择的工具来开发多变量逻辑回归模型。

结果

该方案于2014年8月由荷兰移植基金会资助。我们预计在2020年7月获得本研究的结果。患者入组于2018年7月完成,数据收集于2020年4月完成。

结论

本研究将基于临床和生理参数提供一个强大的多模式预测模型,该模型可以预测cDCD供体的循环停止时间。此外,它将为cDCD供体的WLST过程提供有价值的见解,并将填补这一重要医疗领域的重要知识空白。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04123275;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04123275。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/16733。

相似文献

1
Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study.心脏死亡后潜在供体死亡时间的预测模型(DCD III):一项多中心前瞻性观察队列研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jun 23;9(6):e16733. doi: 10.2196/16733.
2
Tensions between end-of-life care and organ donation in controlled donation after circulatory death: ICU healthcare professionals experiences.在控制性循环死亡后器官捐献中,临终关怀与器官捐献之间的紧张关系:重症监护病房医护人员的经验。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01093-1.
3
Critical pathways for controlled donation after circulatory death in France.法国控制循环死亡后捐献的关键路径。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022 Apr;41(2):101029. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101029. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Prioritizing direct heart procurement in organ donors after circulatory death does not jeopardize lung transplant outcomes.在循环性死亡后的器官捐献者中优先进行直接心脏获取不会危及肺移植结果。
JTCVS Tech. 2022 Oct 6;16:182-195. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.08.032. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Prospective Multicenter Observational Cohort Study on Time to Death in Potential Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death Donors-Development and External Validation of Prediction Models: The DCD III Study.潜在循环死亡后供体的死亡时间的前瞻性多中心观察性队列研究-预测模型的制定和外部验证:DCD III 研究。
Transplantation. 2022 Sep 1;106(9):1844-1851. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004106. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
6
How France launched its donation after cardiac death program.法国是如何启动其心脏死亡后器官捐赠项目的。
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014 Feb;33(2):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
7
External validation of prediction models for time to death in potential donors after circulatory death.循环死亡后潜在供体死亡时间预测模型的外部验证。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Apr;18(4):890-896. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14529. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
Normothermic regional perfusion vs. super-rapid recovery in controlled donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.常温区域性灌注与控制性循环死亡供肝肝移植中超快速恢复的比较。
J Hepatol. 2019 Apr;70(4):658-665. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.12.013. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
9
Controlled donation after circulatory death in post-cardiac arrest patients: Estimates from a large registry.心脏骤停后患者的循环死亡后控制捐献:来自大型登记处的估计
Resuscitation. 2024 Jun;199:110202. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110202. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
10
Determining the impact of timing and of clinical factors during end-of-life decision-making in potential controlled donation after circulatory death donors.确定潜在循环死亡供体在生命末期决策时时间和临床因素的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Dec;20(12):3574-3581. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16104. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
When circulatory death does not come in time in potential organ donors.当潜在器官捐献者的循环性死亡未及时发生时。
Crit Care. 2019 May 2;23(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2443-4.
2
Physician Experiences with Communicating Organ Donation with the Relatives: A Dutch Nationwide Evaluation on Factors that Influence Consent Rates.医生在与亲属沟通器官捐献方面的经验:一项影响同意率因素的荷兰全国评估。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Oct;31(2):357-364. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00678-8.
3
External validation of prediction models for time to death in potential donors after circulatory death.循环死亡后潜在供体死亡时间预测模型的外部验证。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Apr;18(4):890-896. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14529. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
4
A case for stopping the early withdrawal of life sustaining therapies in patients with devastating brain injuries.关于停止对严重脑损伤患者过早撤除维持生命疗法的案例。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 Nov;17(4):295-301. doi: 10.1177/1751143716647980. Epub 2016 May 5.
5
The Influence of End-of-Life Care on Organ Donor Potential.临终关怀对器官捐献潜在供体的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jul;17(7):1922-1927. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14286. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):TRIPOD 声明。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 7;350:g7594. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7594.
7
Eligibility of patients withheld or withdrawn from life-sustaining treatment to organ donation after circulatory arrest death: epidemiological feasibility study in a French Intensive Care Unit.心跳骤停死亡后进行器官捐献而被保留或撤回生命支持治疗的患者资格:法国重症监护病房的一项流行病学可行性研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2013 Nov 7;3(1):36. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-36.
8
Time to death after withdrawal of treatment in donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors.在循环死亡供体(DCD)供体停止治疗后的死亡时间。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2013 Apr;18(2):133-9. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32835ed81b.
9
Prediction models of donor arrest and graft utilization in liver transplantation from maastricht-3 donors after circulatory death.基于 Maastricht-3 标准的体外循环死亡供肝肝移植中供肝获取和使用的预测模型。
Am J Transplant. 2012 Dec;12(12):3414-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04242.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
10
Prediction of potential for organ donation after cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state: a prospective observational study.神经危重症患者心脏死亡后潜在器官捐献预测:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2012 May;11(5):414-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70060-1. Epub 2012 Apr 10.