• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

材料效率衡量废物管理系统的环境绩效:以奥地利、德国和塞尔维亚的 PET 瓶回收为例。

Material efficiency to measure the environmental performance of waste management systems: A case study on PET bottle recycling in Austria, Germany and Serbia.

机构信息

Research Center for Resource Management and Solid Waste Engineering, University of Kassel, Mönchebergstraße 7, 34125 Kassel, Germany.

Research Center for Resource Management and Solid Waste Engineering, University of Kassel, Mönchebergstraße 7, 34125 Kassel, Germany.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2020 Jun 1;110:74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.011
PMID:32460107
Abstract

Material efficiency measures, such as recycling rates, are often used to set circular economy targets to achieve higher resource efficiency and lower environmental impact. The aim of this study was to identify material efficiency indicators suitable to reflect the environmental performance of waste and recycling systems using PET bottle waste management in three European countries with diverse waste management structures and recycling performance levels. Material flow analysis and life cycle assessment were performed to assess the material efficiency and environmental impacts of each system as a basis to analyze the relation between these two dimensions. PET bottle waste generation was 5.4 kg/person and year (pa) in Austria in 2013, 6.0 kg/pa in Germany in 2017 and 6.9 kg/pa in Serbia in 2015. Out of this waste flow 41%, 91%, and 11% were directed into PET recyclate in Austria, Germany and Serbia, respectively. For all systems, higher material efficiency translated into lower environmental impact and vice versa. However, linear regression analysis between different material efficiency indicators and environmental impacts showed that indicators targeted at actual recycling, specifically at closed loop, were better suited to reflect environmental performance than input-based indicators. Therefore, whenever data are available, output-based quality-related indicators should be used to measure the material efficiency of waste and resource systems because they correlate best with the goals of increasing resource efficiency and decreasing environmental impacts.

摘要

材料效率措施,如回收率,通常用于设定循环经济目标,以实现更高的资源效率和更低的环境影响。本研究的目的是确定适合反映废物和回收系统环境性能的材料效率指标,研究对象为三个具有不同废物管理结构和回收性能水平的欧洲国家的 PET 瓶废物管理。采用物质流分析和生命周期评价来评估每个系统的材料效率和环境影响,以此作为分析这两个维度之间关系的基础。2013 年,奥地利人均 PET 瓶废物产生量为 5.4 千克/人年,2017 年德国为 6.0 千克/人年,2015 年塞尔维亚为 6.9 千克/人年。在这些废物中,41%、91%和 11%分别被定向到奥地利、德国和塞尔维亚的 PET 再生料中。对于所有系统,较高的材料效率意味着较低的环境影响,反之亦然。然而,不同材料效率指标与环境影响之间的线性回归分析表明,针对实际回收,特别是闭环回收的指标,比基于投入的指标更适合反映环境性能。因此,只要有数据可用,就应使用基于产出的质量相关指标来衡量废物和资源系统的材料效率,因为它们与提高资源效率和减少环境影响的目标相关性最好。

相似文献

1
Material efficiency to measure the environmental performance of waste management systems: A case study on PET bottle recycling in Austria, Germany and Serbia.材料效率衡量废物管理系统的环境绩效:以奥地利、德国和塞尔维亚的 PET 瓶回收为例。
Waste Manag. 2020 Jun 1;110:74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 24.
2
Circular economy of plastic packaging: Current practice and perspectives in Austria.塑料包装的循环经济:奥地利的现状与展望。
Waste Manag. 2018 Feb;72:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.040. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
3
Modular life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management.城市固体废物管理的模块化生命周期评估。
Waste Manag. 2018 Sep;79:815-827. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.035. Epub 2018 May 31.
4
Integrating High-Resolution Material Flow Data into the Environmental Assessment of Waste Management System Scenarios: The Case of Plastic Packaging in Austria.将高分辨率物质流数据纳入废物管理系统情景的环境评估中:以奥地利塑料包装为例。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Oct 2;52(19):10934-10945. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04233. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
The environmental benefits of improving packaging waste collection in Europe.提高欧洲包装废物收集水平的环境效益。
Waste Manag. 2020 Feb 15;103:426-436. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.045. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
The multidimensional effects of single-use and packaging plastic strategies on German household waste management.一次性和包装用塑料策略对德国家庭废物管理的多维影响。
Waste Manag. 2021 Jul 15;131:187-200. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
7
Environmental performance of household waste management in Europe - An example of 7 countries.欧洲的家庭废物管理环境绩效-7 个国家的例子。
Waste Manag. 2017 Nov;69:545-557. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.042. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
8
Assessment of the waste electrical and electronic equipment management systems profile and sustainability in developed and developing European Union countries.评估发达和发展中欧盟国家的废弃电气电子设备管理系统概况和可持续性。
Waste Manag. 2018 Mar;73:39-53. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.022. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
9
Life cycle environmental impacts of chemical recycling via pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste in comparison with mechanical recycling and energy recovery.混合塑料废物热解化学回收与机械回收和能源回收的生命周期环境影响比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 15;769:144483. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144483. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
10
Material Flow Analysis as a Tool to improve Waste Management Systems: The Case of Austria.物质流分析作为改进废物管理系统的工具:以奥地利为例。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Jan 3;51(1):540-551. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04204. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Special Issue: "Microbial Enzymes for Biotechnological Applications".特刊:“用于生物技术应用的微生物酶”。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 26;26(5):2040. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052040.
2
Combining LCA-MFA models to identify China's plastic value chain environmental impact mitigation pathways.结合生命周期评估-物质流分析模型以识别中国塑料价值链的环境影响缓解途径。
iScience. 2023 Aug 24;26(9):107701. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107701. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.