ETH Zurich, Institute of Environmental Engineering, John-von-Neumann Weg 9, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Carbotech AG, Gasometerstrasse 9, CH-8005 Zürich, Switzerland.
Waste Manag. 2018 Sep;79:815-827. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.035. Epub 2018 May 31.
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is commonly applied to examine the environmental performance of waste management systems. The system boundaries are, however, often limited to either one tonne of material or to specific waste treatments and are, therefore, lacking a systems perspective. Here, a framework is proposed to assess complete waste management systems based on actual waste flows, assessed with a detailed material flow analysis (MFA) in a modular MFA/LCA approach. The transformation of the MFA into a product-process-matrix facilitates a direct link between MFA and LCA, therefore allowing for the assessment of variations in flows. To allow for an up-to-date and geographically specific assessment, 190 LCA modules were set up based on primary industrial data and the ecoinvent database. The LCA modules show where there have been improvements in different recycling processes over the past years (e.g. for paper recycling) and highlight that, from an environmental perspective, closed-loop recycling is not always preferable to open-loop recycling. In a case study, the Swiss municipal solid waste management system, of which there is already a detailed MFA, was modeled using the new LCA modules and applying the modular MFA/LCA approach. Five different mass flow distribution scenarios for the Swiss municipal solid waste management system were assessed to show the environmental impact of political measures and to test the sensitivity of the results to key parameters. The results of the case study highlight the importance of the dominant fractions in the overall environmental impacts assessment; while the metal fraction has the highest impact on a per kilogram basis, paper, cardboard, glass and mixed municipal solid waste were found to dominate the environmental impacts of the Swiss waste management system due to their mass. The scenarios also highlight the importance of the energy efficiency of municipal solid waste incineration plants and the credits from material substitution as key variables. In countries with advanced waste management systems such as Switzerland, there is limited improvement potential with further increases in recycling rates. In these cases, the focus of political measures should be laid on (i) the utilization of secondary materials in applications where they replace high-impact primary production, and (ii) an increased recovery of energy in waste-to-energy plants.
生命周期评估(LCA)通常用于检查废物管理系统的环境性能。然而,系统边界通常仅限于一吨材料或特定的废物处理方法,因此缺乏系统的观点。在这里,提出了一种基于实际废物流动的框架,以评估完整的废物管理系统,该框架采用详细的物质流分析(MFA),在模块化的 MFA/LCA 方法中进行评估。将 MFA 转化为产品-工艺矩阵,便于在 MFA 和 LCA 之间建立直接联系,因此可以评估流量的变化。为了进行最新和特定于地理位置的评估,根据主要工业数据和 ecoinvent 数据库建立了 190 个 LCA 模块。LCA 模块显示了不同回收过程在过去几年中的改进(例如,纸张回收),并强调从环境角度来看,闭环回收并不总是优于开环回收。在案例研究中,使用新的 LCA 模块和应用模块化的 MFA/LCA 方法,对已有详细 MFA 的瑞士城市固体废物管理系统进行建模。评估了瑞士城市固体废物管理系统的五个不同的质量流分布情景,以展示政治措施的环境影响,并测试结果对关键参数的敏感性。案例研究的结果强调了在整体环境影响评估中主要分数的重要性;虽然金属分数在每公斤的基础上具有最高的影响,但由于其质量,纸张、纸板、玻璃和混合城市固体废物被发现是瑞士废物管理系统环境影响的主要因素。情景还强调了城市固体废物焚烧厂的能源效率和材料替代的信用作为关键变量的重要性。在像瑞士这样的先进废物管理系统的国家,进一步提高回收率的改进潜力有限。在这些情况下,政治措施的重点应放在(i)在替代高影响初级生产的应用中利用二次材料,以及(ii)在废物能源工厂中增加能源回收。