College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, 52Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03760, South Korea.
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 27;20(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08929-6.
The speed of adoption of new drugs and frequencies of substitutions leads to changes in health care expenditures as well as patient outcomes. In this study, we aim to understand the speed of adoption of new drugs and their prescription volume in health care institutions and evaluate the impact of policy options to manage pharmaceutical expenditure.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of health care institutions prescribing NOACs, including Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban, to address the speed of adoption and their substitution from October 1, 2010, through December 31, 2015, using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort. Two threshold time points, including the extension of reimbursement with the need for the letter of opinion and the withdrawal of the letter of opinion, were noted in this study. Then, we applied a survival analysis to elucidate factors that affected the speed of adoption of NOACs, and interrupted time series analysis to estimate the effect of amendments in reimbursement coverage in prescription volume.
Among 934 health care institutions in a study population, 334 institutions (36%) had prescribed NOACs at least one time during the study period, indicating that health care institutions were conservative in adopting new drugs. However, the speed of adoption was related to the characteristics of health care institution. We also found that prescriptions of NOACs before the withdrawal of the need for the letter of opinion were marginal, and the prescription volume of NOACs was significantly increased after the withdrawal of a letter of opinion.
Health care institutions were conservative in adopting new drugs, and the speed of adoption is not closely related to an increased prescription volume in the short run. Thus, policies that are centered on managing pharmaceutical expenditure should be devised with considering the impact of introducing new drugs in the long run. A letter of opinion, which was devised to manage prescriptions of NOACs, was effective in managing pharmaceutical expenditures in health care institutions, particularly for tertiary institutions. Conversely, the withdrawal of the need for the letter of opinion should be implemented with caution.
新药的采用速度和替代频率会导致医疗保健支出和患者结果发生变化。在这项研究中,我们旨在了解新药在医疗机构中的采用速度及其处方量,并评估管理药品支出的政策选择的影响。
我们对 2010 年 10 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间使用国家健康保险服务-全国样本队列,对开出 NOAC(包括阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班)处方的医疗机构进行了回顾性队列研究,以了解采用速度及其从需要意见书到撤销意见书的替代情况。本研究中注意到两个时间阈值,即报销范围的扩展和意见书的撤销。然后,我们应用生存分析来阐明影响 NOAC 采用速度的因素,并通过中断时间序列分析来估计报销范围修订对处方量的影响。
在研究人群的 934 家医疗机构中,有 334 家(36%)至少在研究期间开出了一种 NOAC,这表明医疗机构在采用新药方面较为保守。然而,采用速度与医疗机构的特征有关。我们还发现,在撤销意见书的需求之前开出的 NOAC 处方数量较少,并且在撤销意见书之后,NOAC 的处方量显著增加。
医疗机构在采用新药方面较为保守,在短期内,采用速度与处方量的增加没有密切关系。因此,应考虑引入新药的长期影响,制定以管理药品支出为中心的政策。意见书旨在管理 NOAC 处方,它在医疗机构管理药品支出方面是有效的,特别是对于三级医疗机构。相反,撤销意见书的需求应谨慎实施。