Ambroise Grandjean G, Gabriel P, Hossu G, Zuily S, Morel O, Berveiller P
Département d'obstétrique, CHRU de Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France; Inserm, IADI, université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France; Département universitaire de maïeutique, université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France.
Inserm, IADI, université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Nov;48(11):800-805. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 May 24.
Fetal biometry quality directly influences obstetrical care relevance. However, obstetrician proficiencies are heterogeneous in particular during initial training.
To assess the predictive value of OSAUS scale to identify operators with enough command to perform a valid estimation of fetal weight (EFW) (I). This study also assesses OSAUS intra-operator inter-exams variability (II) and pass/fail score relevancy (III).
Lecturers in Nancy University Hospital assessed trainees' proficiency for EWF systematically and prospectively through OSAUS scale. The trainee assessment was performed right after the one of the senior operator (reference EFW) on three consecutive patients during standard care ultrasounds. To ensure variability in proficiency within the sample, previous practice was taken into account during enrollment ("novices" and "intermediates" for<20 and 20 past exams, respectively). Correlation between mean OSAUS and validity of EFW (a valid EFW was defined by a difference with the reference EWF<0.8 Z-score) and variability between consecutive assessments were assessed.
The study population was constituted of 8 "novice" and 8 "intermediate" trainees. Association between OSAUS and EFW validity was significant (P<0.03) (I). Intra-operator inter-exams variability was majored in the "novice" group (coefficients of variation were 25% vs. 10% in "novice" and "intermediate" group respectively) (II). Within the sample, specificity and positive predictive value of a pass/fail score OSAUS>3.5 to predict EFW validity were 77% and 71%, respectively (III).
A 3.5 OSAUS pass/fail score could provide a relevant threshold to estimate operator proficiency in assessing fetal biometry in an autonomous and secure way.
胎儿生物测量质量直接影响产科护理的相关性。然而,产科医生的熟练程度存在差异,尤其是在初始培训期间。
评估OSAUS量表对识别具备足够能力进行有效胎儿体重估计(EFW)的操作人员的预测价值(I)。本研究还评估了OSAUS量表在同一操作人员不同检查之间的变异性(II)以及通过/未通过分数的相关性(III)。
南锡大学医院的讲师通过OSAUS量表对学员进行系统且前瞻性的胎儿体重估计(EWF)能力评估。在标准护理超声检查期间,学员在资深操作人员(参考EWF)检查后,连续对三名患者进行评估。为确保样本中熟练程度的差异,在招募过程中考虑了先前的实践经验(分别将<20次和超过20次既往检查的学员定义为“新手”和“中级”)。评估了平均OSAUS量表得分与EWF有效性之间的相关性(有效EWF定义为与参考EWF的差异<0.8 Z分数)以及连续评估之间的变异性。
研究人群包括8名“新手”学员和8名“中级”学员。OSAUS量表得分与EWF有效性之间存在显著关联(P<0.03)(I)。同一操作人员不同检查之间的变异性在“新手”组中更为明显(“新手”组和“中级”组的变异系数分别为25%和10%)(II)。在样本中,OSAUS量表通过/未通过分数>3.5预测EWF有效性的特异性和阳性预测值分别为77%和71%(III)。
OSAUS量表3.5的通过/未通过分数可为以自主且安全的方式评估操作人员在胎儿生物测量评估方面的熟练程度提供一个相关阈值。