Ambroise Grandjean G, Berveiller P, Hossu G, Bertholdt C, Judlin P, Morel O
Département d'Obstétrique, CHRU de Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France; Inserm, Université de Lorraine, IADI, rue du Morvan, 54000 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France; Département universitaire de Maïeutique, université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France.
Département d'Obstétrique, CHI de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78300 Poissy, France; Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Apr;49(4):275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
To develop and validate a customized variant for fetal biometry of the generic OSAUS score (Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills) METHODS: The 5-points OSAUS METHOD grid was elaborated by defining five target skills specific to fetal biometry for each thematic item of the generic score. The level of skills of 43 trainees was prospectively assessed during an ultrasound examination by using this grid. The results of the "novice" level group (experience<10 ultrasounds) were compared to those of the "intermediate" level group (experience≥10 ultrasounds) (I). The reached/non-reached skills ratio within the different items composing the score allowed the identification of priority areas of improvement (II). Previously published distribution and actual distribution of ratings according to the generic pass/fail score were compared (III).
Median scores of "novices" (n=29) and "intermediates" (n=14) groups were statistically different, 1.87 (±0.75) and 3.31 (±0.83) (P=1.85-5), respectively and corresponded to the pre-existing experience (I). A lower ratio of reached skill allowed the identification of "documentation of the examination" item as a priority area of improvement for both groups (II). The relevance of the pass/fail score is consolidated, even if an overlap was observed between novices and intermediates groups (III).
The relevancy and feasibility of using OSAUS scoring method for fetal biometry are supported. In addition, the possibility of comparisons with generic OSAUS remains.
开发并验证通用OSAUS评分(超声技能客观结构化评估)中胎儿生物测量的定制变体。方法:通过为通用评分的每个主题项目定义五项特定于胎儿生物测量的目标技能,精心制作了5分制的OSAUS方法网格。在超声检查期间,使用该网格对43名学员的技能水平进行前瞻性评估。将“新手”水平组(经验<10次超声检查)的结果与“中级”水平组(经验≥10次超声检查)的结果进行比较(I)。构成评分的不同项目中已达到/未达到的技能比率有助于确定优先改进领域(II)。比较了根据通用及格/不及格评分先前公布的评分分布和实际评分分布(III)。结果:“新手”组(n = 29)和“中级”组(n = 14)的中位数分数在统计学上存在差异,分别为1.87(±0.75)和3.31(±0.83)(P = 1.85 - 5),且与先前的经验相符(I)。较低的技能达成率使得“检查记录”项目被确定为两组的优先改进领域(II)。及格/不及格评分的相关性得到巩固,尽管在新手组和中级组之间观察到了重叠(III)。结论:支持将OSAUS评分方法用于胎儿生物测量的相关性和可行性。此外,与通用OSAUS进行比较的可能性仍然存在。