在年龄<60 岁的初诊急性髓系白血病成人患者中,其他基因突变可能会完善 2017 年欧洲白血病网络分类。
Additional gene mutations may refine the 2017 European LeukemiaNet classification in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia aged <60 years.
机构信息
Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
出版信息
Leukemia. 2020 Dec;34(12):3215-3227. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0872-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have become an important tool to assess patients' prognosis and guide treatment. We tested the prognostic impact of the 2017 ELN classification in a large cohort of 863 AML patients aged <60 years similarly treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology studies. Based on multivariable models within each ELN genetic-risk group, we identified additional gene mutations that may refine the 2017 ELN risk classification. BCOR- or SETBP1-mutated favorable-risk patients with non-core-binding factor AML and IDH-mutated adverse-risk patients had intermediate-risk outcomes. Outcomes of NPM1/WT1 co-mutated patients and those of ZRSR2-mutated patients resembled outcome of adverse-risk patients. Moreover, FLT3-ITD allelic ratio conferred adverse rather than intermediate-risk irrespective of the NPM1 mutation status, and DNMT3A mutations associated with very poor survival. Application of these refinements reclassified 9% of current favorable-risk patients and 53% of current intermediate-risk patients to the adverse-risk group, with similar poor survival as current adverse-risk patients. Furthermore, 4% of current favorable-risk patients and 9% of adverse-risk patients were reclassified to the intermediate-risk group.
欧洲白血病网络(ELN)的急性髓系白血病(AML)诊断和治疗建议已成为评估患者预后和指导治疗的重要工具。我们在癌症和白血病组 B/肿瘤临床试验联盟的多项研究中,对 863 名年龄<60 岁的 AML 患者进行了类似的治疗,检测了 2017 年 ELN 分类的预后影响。基于每个 ELN 遗传风险组的多变量模型,我们确定了其他可能改善 2017 年 ELN 风险分类的基因突变。BCOR 或 SETBP1 突变的有利风险患者伴有非核心结合因子 AML 和 IDH 突变的不良风险患者具有中间风险的结果。NPM1/WT1 共突变患者和 ZRSR2 突变患者的结果与不良风险患者的结果相似。此外,FLT3-ITD 等位基因比率赋予不良风险而不是中间风险,而与 NPM1 突变状态无关,DNMT3A 突变与极差的生存相关。这些细化分类将当前 9%的有利风险患者和 53%的当前中间风险患者重新分类为不良风险组,与当前不良风险患者的生存极差相似。此外,4%的有利风险患者和 9%的不良风险患者被重新分类为中间风险组。
相似文献
引用本文的文献
Cancers (Basel). 2025-7-23
Cancers (Basel). 2025-6-23
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2024-12-14
Innovation (Camb). 2024-10-21
Ther Adv Hematol. 2024-9-26
本文引用的文献
N Engl J Med. 2019-10-31
N Engl J Med. 2018-6-2
N Engl J Med. 2017-8-3