• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者空心加压内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效:一项长期随访研究

Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Cannulated Internal Fixation in Elderly Patients: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

作者信息

Ju Fa-Xin, Hou Rui-Xing, Xiong Jin, Shi Hong-Fei, Chen Yi-Xin, Wang Jun-Fei

机构信息

Ruihua Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Orthopedics Department, Baoying County People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(3):809-818. doi: 10.1111/os.12683. Epub 2020 May 28.

DOI:10.1111/os.12683
PMID:32462816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7307235/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of cannulated internal fixation in patients who sustain femoral neck fracture (FNF) and risk factors influencing the outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from 73 elderly patients aged ≥60 years old, hospitalized for FNF and treated with cannulated internal fixation between August 2008 and July 2016. The inclusion criteria were: (i) patients aged ≥60 years; (ii) patients with recent femoral neck fracture, with times of injury ranging from 12-72 h; and (iii) patients who underwent Garden II-IV closed reduction and internal fixation. Patients were classified based on the Garden fracture type and Pauwels angle. Clinical data and radiographs before and after the surgery were collected. Subsequently, surgery was performed with the patient in supine position, under general or lumbar epidural anesthesia. Closed reduction was performed until satisfactory fracture reduction quality was achieved. The weight of all included patients were <75 kg, and thus, minimal internal fixation was performed. The ischemic necrosis of the femoral head was diagnosed by considering the symptoms, signs, and radiological findings. Harris hip scores were used to evaluate postoperative recovery of hip function. Furthermore, relationships between Garden fracture type and necrosis rate of the femoral head, Pauwels angle and necrosis rate of the femoral head, Garden fracture type and Harris hip score, and age and Harris hip score were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean duration of surgery was 1 ± 0.17 h and blood loss for all the patients was approximately 15 mL. The included patients were followed up for 13-128 months, with an average follow-up of 61 months. Among the included 73 patients, 65 (89.0%) exhibited satisfactory union, seven (9.6%) had femoral head necrosis, and one (1.4%) had nonunion. For seven patients with femoral head necrosis, there were two, two, and three patients classified as Garden IV, Garden III, and Garden II, respectively, and two and five patients classified as Pauwels II and Pauwels III, respectively. Among the seven cases, four underwent hip replacement. Garden fracture type was not significantly associated with femoral head necrosis (χ = 0.44, P > 0.05) or Harris score (χ = 1.43, P > 0.05). Patients with Pauwels I (0%) and II (4.3%) fractures exhibited a significantly lower necrosis rate than those with Pauwels III fractures (41.7%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cannulated internal fixation was more suitable for older Chinese patients with Pauwels I/II fractures than those with Pauwels III fractures.

摘要

目的

评估空心加压内固定术治疗股骨颈骨折(FNF)患者的长期疗效以及影响预后的危险因素。

方法

本回顾性研究分析了2008年8月至2016年7月期间因股骨颈骨折住院并接受空心加压内固定术治疗的73例≥60岁老年患者的数据。纳入标准为:(i)年龄≥60岁;(ii)近期股骨颈骨折患者,受伤时间为12 - 72小时;(iii)接受Garden II - IV型闭合复位内固定术的患者。患者根据Garden骨折类型和Pauwels角进行分类。收集手术前后的临床资料和X线片。随后,患者在全身或腰麻下仰卧位进行手术。进行闭合复位直至获得满意的骨折复位质量。所有纳入患者体重均<75 kg,因此采用最小化内固定。根据症状、体征和影像学表现诊断股骨头缺血性坏死。采用Harris髋关节评分评估术后髋关节功能恢复情况。此外,分析Garden骨折类型与股骨头坏死率、Pauwels角与股骨头坏死率、Garden骨折类型与Harris髋关节评分以及年龄与Harris髋关节评分之间的关系。

结果

手术平均时长为1 ± 0.17小时,所有患者术中出血量约为15 mL。纳入患者随访13 - 128个月,平均随访61个月。73例纳入患者中,65例(89.0%)骨折愈合良好,7例(9.6%)发生股骨头坏死,1例(1.4%)骨折不愈合。7例股骨头坏死患者中,Garden IV型、Garden III型和Garden II型分别有2例、2例和3例,Pauwels II型和Pauwels III型分别有2例和5例。7例中4例接受了髋关节置换术。Garden骨折类型与股骨头坏死(χ = 0.44,P > 0.05)或Harris评分(χ = 1.43,P > 0.05)无显著相关性。Pauwels I型(0%)和II型(4.3%)骨折患者的坏死率显著低于Pauwels III型骨折患者(41.7%)(P < 0.05)。

结论

对于中国老年患者,空心加压内固定术治疗Pauwels I/II型骨折比治疗Pauwels III型骨折更合适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b4/7307235/703afb25d7c9/OS-12-809-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b4/7307235/3a918dda41b9/OS-12-809-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b4/7307235/f2eba9c55cc4/OS-12-809-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b4/7307235/703afb25d7c9/OS-12-809-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b4/7307235/3a918dda41b9/OS-12-809-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b4/7307235/f2eba9c55cc4/OS-12-809-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b4/7307235/703afb25d7c9/OS-12-809-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Cannulated Internal Fixation in Elderly Patients: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.老年患者空心加压内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效:一项长期随访研究
Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(3):809-818. doi: 10.1111/os.12683. Epub 2020 May 28.
2
[Analysis of risk factors for necrosis of femoral head after internal fixation surgery in young and mid-aged patients with femoral neck fracture].中青年股骨颈骨折内固定术后股骨头坏死的危险因素分析
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Apr 18;52(2):290-297. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.02.016.
3
[Efficacy comparison between dynamic hip screw combined with anti-rotation screw and cannulated screw in treating femoral neck fractures].动力髋螺钉联合防旋螺钉与空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jan;25(1):26-9.
4
[Subtype classification of Garden III femoral neck fractures in the elderly based on frontal Garden index and its clinical significance].基于正位Garden指数的老年GardenⅢ型股骨颈骨折亚型分类及其临床意义
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Nov 25;29(11):982-988. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.11.003.
5
[Comparison of effectiveness of three surgical methods in treatment of Pauwels type femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients].[三种手术方法治疗中青年 Pauwels 型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Apr 15;38(4):412-421. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202401110.
6
Clinical observation and finite element analysis of cannulated screw internal fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture based on different reduction quality.基于不同复位质量的空心螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的临床观察与有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jul 13;16(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02580-6.
7
Using a modified Pauwels method to predict the outcome of femoral neck fracture in relatively young patients.使用改良的 Pauwels 方法预测相对年轻患者股骨颈骨折的预后。
Injury. 2015 Oct;46(10):1969-74. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
8
[Comparison of femoral neck system and inverted triangle cannulated screws fixations in treatment of Pauwels typle femoral neck fractures].股骨颈系统与倒三角空心螺钉固定治疗 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Sep 15;35(9):1111-1118. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202102046.
9
[Analysis on Harris scores at follow-up after internal fixation of femoral neck fracture].[股骨颈骨折内固定术后随访时Harris评分分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Apr;23(4):435-9.
10
Femoral Neck System vs. four cannulated screws in the treatment of Pauwels III femoral neck fracture.股骨颈系统与四颗空心螺钉治疗 Pauwels III 型股骨颈骨折的对比
J Orthop Sci. 2023 Nov;28(6):1373-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.09.006. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Time Is Bone: Missed Opportunities for Secondary Prevention After a Hip Fracture.时间就是骨头:髋部骨折后二级预防的错失机遇
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 17;14(16):5816. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165816.
2
The dynamic locking blade plate: seven-year follow-up results of 389 patients with a femoral neck fracture.动力锁定钢板治疗股骨颈骨折:389 例患者 7 年随访结果
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2219-2227. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02552-5. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Comparison of percutaneous compression plate to parallel screws in the treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a prospective, randomized study.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical application of a novel method of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures-dynamic locking compression system.一种用于股骨颈骨折的新型内固定方法——动力锁定加压系统的临床应用。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 May 31;13(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0827-9.
2
[Comparison of clinical effects of total artificial hip replacement and cannulated screw fixation for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients].[全髋关节置换术与空心钉内固定术治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折的临床疗效比较]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Feb 25;31(2):103-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.02.002.
3
Association between obesity and femoral neck strength according to age, sex, and fat distribution.
经皮加压钢板与平行螺钉治疗老年股骨颈无移位骨折的比较:前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Dec;143(12):7063-7071. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05029-z. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
4
Prediction of hip joint function and analysis of risk factors for internal fixation failure after Femoral Neck System (FNS).预测髋关节功能和分析股骨颈系统(FNS)内固定失败的风险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 24;24(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06805-z.
5
Characteristics of subsequent contralateral proximal femoral fracture: more convenient access is needed to treat osteoporosis.后续对侧股骨近端骨折的特点:需要更方便的途径来治疗骨质疏松症。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 21;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03621-y.
6
Proportion of stable femoral neck fracture types in different age groups: a population-based study.不同年龄组稳定型股骨颈骨折类型的比例:一项基于人群的研究。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Dec;50(12):3000605221138481. doi: 10.1177/03000605221138481.
7
The incidence of focal osteonecrosis of the femoral head and its impact on conversion hip arthroplasty after screw fixation of femoral neck fractures: a multicenter retrospective study based on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.基于术后磁共振成像的多中心回顾性研究:股骨颈骨折螺钉固定后股骨头局灶性骨坏死的发生率及其对髋关节转换的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr;49(2):991-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02122-7. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
8
The Risk of Avascular Necrosis Following the Stabilization of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.股骨颈骨折固定后发生缺血性坏死的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;19(16):10050. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610050.
9
A New Method to Protect Blood Supply in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: Bidirectional Compression Porous Tantalum Screws.一种保护股骨颈骨折血供的新方法:双向压缩多孔钽螺钉。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):1964-1971. doi: 10.1111/os.13285. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
10
Comparison Between Femoral Neck Systems and Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.股骨颈系统与空心松质骨螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的比较:一项荟萃分析
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2022 Jul 6;13:21514593221113533. doi: 10.1177/21514593221113533. eCollection 2022.
肥胖与股骨颈强度的关联,依据年龄、性别和脂肪分布。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jul;28(7):2137-2146. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4015-2. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
4
Hip arthroplasty for the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients.髋关节置换术治疗老年患者股骨颈移位骨折。
Bone Joint J. 2016 Mar;98-B(3):291-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.36515.
5
Combined Type II Odontoid Fracture with Jefferson's Fracture Treated with Temporary Internal Fixation.采用临时内固定治疗合并Jefferson骨折的Ⅱ型齿状突骨折
Asian Spine J. 2015 Dec;9(6):966-70. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.6.966. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Efficacies of surgical treatments based on Harris hip score in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.基于Harris髋关节评分的手术治疗对老年股骨颈骨折患者的疗效
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):6784-93. eCollection 2015.
7
Analysis of risk factors for femoral head necrosis after internal fixation in femoral neck fractures.股骨颈骨折内固定术后股骨头坏死的危险因素分析
Orthopedics. 2014 Dec;37(12):e1117-23. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20141124-60.
8
The societal costs of femoral neck fracture patients treated with internal fixation.采用内固定治疗的股骨颈骨折患者的社会成本。
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Mar;25(3):875-85. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2487-2. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
9
Body composition and skeletal health: too heavy? Too thin?身体成分和骨骼健康:太重了?太瘦了?
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2012 Sep;10(3):208-16. doi: 10.1007/s11914-012-0106-3.
10
Quantitative score system for the surgical decision on adult femoral neck fractures.成人股骨颈骨折手术决策的量化评分系统
Orthopedics. 2012 Feb 17;35(2):e137-43. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120123-09.