Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e206027. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6027.
Apathy is a frequent neuropsychiatric symptom in dementia of Alzheimer type and negatively affects the disease course and patients' and caregivers' quality of life. Effective treatment options are needed.
To examine the efficacy and safety of the dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor bupropion in the treatment of apathy in patients with dementia of Alzheimer type.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted in a psychiatric and neurological outpatient setting between July 2010 and July 2014 in Germany. Patients with mild-to-moderate dementia of Alzheimer type and clinically relevant apathy were included. Patients with additional clinically relevant depressed mood were excluded. Data analyses were performed between August 2018 and August 2019.
Patients received either bupropion or placebo (150 mg for 4 weeks plus 300 mg for 8 weeks). In case of intolerability of 300 mg, patients continued to receive 150 mg throughout the study.
Change on the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinician Version (AES-C) (score range, 18-72 points) between baseline and week 12 was the primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters included measures of neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognition, activities of daily living, and quality of life. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
A total of 108 patients (mean [SD] age, 74.8 [5.9] years; 67 men [62%]) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, with 54 randomized to receive bupropion and 54 randomized to receive placebo. The baseline AES-C score was comparable between the bupropion group and the placebo group (mean [SD], 52.2 [8.7] vs 50.4 [8.2]). After controlling for the baseline AES-C score, site, and comedication with donepezil or galantamine, the mean change in the AES-C score between the bupropion and placebo groups was not statistically significant (mean change, 2.22; 95% CI, -0.47 to 4.91; P = .11). Results on secondary outcomes showed statistically significant differences between bupropion and placebo in terms of total neuropsychiatric symptoms (mean change, 5.52; 95% CI, 2.00 to 9.04; P = .003) and health-related quality of life (uncorrected for multiple comparisons; mean change, -1.66; 95% CI, -3.01 to -0.31; P = .02) with greater improvement in the placebo group. No statistically significant changes between groups were found for activities of daily living (mean change, -2.92; 95% CI, -5.89 to 0.06; P = .05) and cognition (mean change, -0.27; 95% CI, -3.26 to 2.73; P = .86). The numbers of adverse events (bupropion group, 39 patients [72.2%]; placebo group, 33 patients [61.1%]) and serious adverse events (bupropion group, 5 patients [9.3%]; placebo group, 2 patients [3.7%]) were comparable between groups.
Although it is safe, bupropion was not superior to placebo for the treatment of apathy in patients with dementia of Alzheimer type in the absence of clinically relevant depressed mood.
EU Clinical Trials Register Identifier: 2007-005352-17.
重要性:淡漠是阿尔茨海默病型痴呆的一种常见神经精神症状,会对疾病进程和患者及照护者的生活质量产生负面影响。需要有效的治疗选择。
目的:研究多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂安非他酮治疗阿尔茨海默病型痴呆患者淡漠的疗效和安全性。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项 12 周、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验,于 2010 年 7 月至 2014 年 7 月在德国的精神病学和神经病学门诊进行。纳入了轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病型痴呆且伴有临床相关淡漠的患者。排除了伴有其他临床相关抑郁情绪的患者。数据分析于 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 8 月进行。
干预措施:患者接受安非他酮或安慰剂(4 周时 150 mg,8 周时 300 mg)治疗。如果不耐受 300 mg,患者在整个研究过程中继续接受 150 mg。
主要结局和测量指标:基线至第 12 周时,Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinician Version(AES-C)的变化(评分范围,18-72 分)是主要结局参数。次要结局参数包括神经精神症状、认知、日常生活活动和生活质量的测量。在基线和第 4、8 和 12 周进行了评估。
结果:共有 108 例患者(平均[标准差]年龄,74.8[5.9]岁;67 例男性[62%])纳入意向治疗分析,其中 54 例随机接受安非他酮治疗,54 例随机接受安慰剂治疗。安非他酮组和安慰剂组的基线 AES-C 评分相当(平均[标准差],52.2[8.7]比 50.4[8.2])。在控制基线 AES-C 评分、地点和与多奈哌齐或加兰他敏的合并用药后,安非他酮组和安慰剂组之间 AES-C 评分的平均变化无统计学意义(平均变化,2.22;95%置信区间,-0.47 至 4.91;P=.11)。次要结局结果显示,安非他酮组在总神经精神症状(平均变化,5.52;95%置信区间,2.00 至 9.04;P=.003)和健康相关生活质量(未经校正的多重比较;平均变化,-1.66;95%置信区间,-3.01 至 -0.31;P=.02)方面与安慰剂组相比有统计学意义的差异,安慰剂组的改善更大。两组在日常生活活动(平均变化,-2.92;95%置信区间,-5.89 至 0.06;P=.05)和认知(平均变化,-0.27;95%置信区间,-3.26 至 2.73;P=.86)方面无统计学显著变化。不良事件的数量(安非他酮组 39 例[72.2%];安慰剂组 33 例[61.1%])和严重不良事件(安非他酮组 5 例[9.3%];安慰剂组 2 例[3.7%])在两组之间相似。
结论和相关性:尽管安非他酮是安全的,但在没有临床相关抑郁情绪的情况下,它对阿尔茨海默病型痴呆患者的淡漠治疗并不优于安慰剂。
试验注册:EU Clinical Trials Register Identifier:2007-005352-17。