Hemodialysis Unit, 1st Department of Medicine, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hemodialysis Unit, General Hospital of Xanthi, Xanthi, Greece.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Oct;50(10):e13292. doi: 10.1111/eci.13292. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
Earlier studies provided considerably variable estimates on the prevalence and control rates of hypertension in haemodialysis because of their heterogeneity in definitions and blood pressure (BP) measurement techniques applied to detect hypertension.
In this cross-sectional study, 116 clinically stable haemodialysis patients from 3 dialysis centres of Northern Greece underwent home BP monitoring for 1 week with the validated automatic device HEM-705 (Omron, Healthcare). Routine BP recordings taken before and after dialysis over 6 consecutive sessions were also prospectively collected and averaged. Hypertension was defined as: (a) 1-week averaged home BP ≥ 135/85 mm Hg; (b) 2-week averaged predialysis BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg; and (c) 2-week averaged postdialysis BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg. Participants on treatment with ≥1 antihypertensives were also classified as hypertensives.
The prevalence of hypertension was 88.8% by home, 86.2% by predialysis and 91.4% by postdialysis BP recordings. In all, 96 participants (82.7%) were being treated with an average of 2.0 ± 1.1 antihypertensive medications. Among drug-treated participants, 32.6% were controlled by home, 50.5% by predialysis and 45.3% by postdialysis BP recordings. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, greater use of antihypertensive medications and postdialysis overhydration, assessed with bioimpedance spectroscopy, were both independently associated with higher odds of inadequate home BP control.
This study shows that the prevalence, but mainly the control rates of hypertension in patients on haemodialysis, differs between peridialytic and interdialytic BP recordings. Therefore, the wider use of home BP monitoring may improve the determination of BP control status in this high-risk population.
由于在定义和应用于检测高血压的血压(BP)测量技术方面存在异质性,早期研究对血液透析患者高血压的患病率和控制率提供了相当大的差异估计。
在这项横断面研究中,来自希腊北部 3 个透析中心的 116 名临床稳定的血液透析患者使用经过验证的自动设备 HEM-705(欧姆龙,医疗保健)进行了为期 1 周的家庭 BP 监测。还前瞻性地收集并平均了 6 个连续疗程前后透析时的常规 BP 记录。高血压的定义为:(a)1 周平均家庭 BP≥135/85mmHg;(b)2 周平均预透析 BP≥140/90mmHg;和(c)2 周平均透析后 BP≥130/80mmHg。接受≥1 种降压药治疗的患者也被归类为高血压患者。
家庭 BP 记录的高血压患病率为 88.8%,预透析时为 86.2%,透析后为 91.4%。总共,96 名患者(82.7%)接受平均 2.0±1.1 种降压药物治疗。在接受药物治疗的患者中,32.6%通过家庭 BP 得到控制,50.5%通过预透析 BP 得到控制,45.3%通过透析后 BP 得到控制。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,降压药物的更大使用量和生物电阻抗谱评估的透析后过度水化与家庭 BP 控制不足的更高可能性独立相关。
本研究表明,血液透析患者的高血压患病率,但主要是控制率,在围透析期和透析间期 BP 记录之间存在差异。因此,更广泛地使用家庭 BP 监测可能会改善对这一高危人群的 BP 控制状况的评估。