• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科医生对口吃儿童的转诊实践。

Pediatrician Referral Practices for Children Who Stutter.

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Aug 4;29(3):1404-1422. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00058. Epub 2020 May 28.

DOI:10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00058
PMID:32464074
Abstract

Purpose Given the marked increase in evidence-based information regarding the nature/treatment of stuttering, coupled with the fact that pediatricians tend to be one of the initial points of contact for parents who suspect their preschool-age child may stutter, this study explored pediatricians' (a) accuracy in identifying children who may stutter and (b) likelihood of referring children who present with a profile indicative of stuttering to speech-language pathologists. Method Pediatricians recruited nationally through professional organizations completed a 5- to 7-min online survey that probed stuttering identification and referral practices via responses to experimental case vignettes. Each vignette featured a 4-year-old boy with a family history of stuttering whose mother reported signs of stuttering and manipulation of two factors: stuttering during the pediatrician visit (or not) and negative communication attitude (or not). Results Our findings suggest pediatricians' identification and referral of children who may stutter is largely prompted by observation of overt speech behaviors and/or negative communication attitude. Participants' gender, years in practice, and experience working with children who stutter did not influence likelihood of referral. Conclusions Results indicate pediatricians are less likely to implement a "wait and see" approach with young children who stutter today than in the past. Unlike other common child onset diagnoses, however, parent report of atypical behavior does not yield pediatrician referral to a specialist. Future education and advocacy efforts directed toward pediatricians should emphasize inclusion of factors other than direct observation of stuttering behavior that may warrant referral (e.g., parent report).

摘要

目的 鉴于有关口吃的性质/治疗的循证信息明显增加,而且儿科医生往往是怀疑学龄前儿童可能口吃的父母最初联系的人之一,本研究探讨了儿科医生(a)识别可能口吃的儿童的准确性,以及(b)将表现出口吃特征的儿童转介给言语语言病理学家的可能性。 方法 通过专业组织在全国范围内招募儿科医生,他们通过对实验案例描述的回答来完成 5 到 7 分钟的在线调查,以探究口吃识别和转介实践。每个案例描述都有一个 4 岁的男孩,他有口吃的家族史,他的母亲报告有口吃的迹象,并操纵了两个因素:儿科医生就诊期间口吃(或不口吃)和负面沟通态度(或不)。 结果 我们的研究结果表明,儿科医生对口吃儿童的识别和转介主要是由观察明显的言语行为和/或负面沟通态度引起的。参与者的性别、从业年限以及与口吃儿童合作的经验并没有影响转介的可能性。 结论 结果表明,与过去相比,儿科医生今天更不可能对患有口吃的幼儿采取“观望”的方法。然而,与其他常见的儿童起病诊断不同,父母报告的异常行为并不会导致儿科医生将其转介给专家。未来针对儿科医生的教育和宣传工作应强调纳入可能需要转介的其他因素(例如,父母的报告),而不仅仅是直接观察口吃行为。

相似文献

1
Pediatrician Referral Practices for Children Who Stutter.儿科医生对口吃儿童的转诊实践。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Aug 4;29(3):1404-1422. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00058. Epub 2020 May 28.
2
Risk Factors for the Development of Persistent Stuttering: What Every Pediatrician Should Know.导致口吃持续发生的风险因素:每一位儿科医生都应该了解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 25;19(9):5225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095225.
3
Accuracy of parent identification of stuttering occurrence.家长识别口吃发生的准确性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Nov-Dec;44(6):847-63. doi: 10.1080/13682820802389865.
4
Palin Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: The Bigger Picture.佩林父母-儿童互动治疗:更大的图景。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Oct 19;27(3S):1211-1223. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0199.
5
Psychosocial features of stuttering for school-age children: A systematic review.学龄儿童口吃的社会心理特征:一项系统综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Sep-Oct;58(5):1829-1845. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12887. Epub 2023 May 3.
6
Is it possible for speech therapy to improve upon natural recovery rates in children who stutter?言语治疗能否提高口吃儿童的自然恢复率?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005 Jul-Sep;40(3):349-58. doi: 10.1080/13693780400027779.
7
Youngsters who stutter: diagnosis, parent counseling, and referral.口吃的青少年:诊断、家长咨询及转诊。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1982 Sep;3(3):163-9.
8
Predictors of communication attitude in preschool-age children who stutter.口吃学龄前儿童沟通态度的预测因素。
J Commun Disord. 2021 May-Jun;91:106100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106100. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
9
Norwegian speech-language pathologists treatment practices for preschool children who stutter: An explorative study.挪威言语治疗师对学龄前口吃儿童的治疗实践:一项探索性研究。
J Fluency Disord. 2023 Sep;77:105999. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.105999. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
10
Phonological and language disorders in children who stutter: impact on treatment recommendations.口吃儿童的语音和语言障碍:对治疗建议的影响。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2004 Mar;18(2):145-59. doi: 10.1080/02699200310001659070.

引用本文的文献

1
CARE Model of Treatment for stuttering: Theory, assumptions, and preliminary findings.口吃治疗的CARE模型:理论、假设及初步研究结果
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 10;15:1488328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1488328. eCollection 2024.
2
Caregiver Predictions of Their 3- to 6-Year-Old Child Who Stutters' Communication Attitude.照顾者对其 3 至 6 岁口吃儿童沟通态度的预测。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jul 9;67(7):2086-2105. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00662. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
3
Validation of the Vanderbilt Responses to Your Child's Speech Rating Scale for Parents of Young Children Who Stutter.
验证范德比尔特儿童言语反应量表在口吃儿童家长中的信度。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Dec 12;65(12):4652-4666. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00182. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Risk Factors for the Development of Persistent Stuttering: What Every Pediatrician Should Know.导致口吃持续发生的风险因素:每一位儿科医生都应该了解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 25;19(9):5225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095225.
5
Prevalence and Therapy Rates for Stuttering, Cluttering, and Developmental Disorders of Speech and Language: Evaluation of German Health Insurance Data.口吃、言语紊乱及言语和语言发育障碍的患病率与治疗率:德国医疗保险数据评估
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Apr 12;15:645292. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.645292. eCollection 2021.