Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jun 22;63(6):1958-1968. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00386. Epub 2020 May 28.
Purpose The phase delay of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) has been proposed as a noninvasive, objective, and fast source for estimating cochlear mechanical tuning. However, the implementation of SFOAEs clinically has been thwarted by the gaps in understanding of the stability of SFOAE delay-based tuning estimates and their relationship to behavioral measures of tuning. Therefore, the goals of this study were (a) to investigate the relationship between delay-based tuning estimates from SFOAEs and simultaneously masked psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) and (b) to assess the across- and within-session repeatability of tuning estimates from behavioral and OAE measures. Method Three sets of behavioral and OAE measurements were collected in 24 normal-hearing, young adults for two probe frequencies, 1 and 4 kHz. For each participant, delay-based tuning estimates were derived from the phase gradient of SFOAEs. SFOAE-based and behavioral estimates of tuning obtained using the fast-swept PTC paradigm were compared within and across sessions. Results In general, tuning estimates were sharper at 4 kHz compared to 1 kHz for both PTCs and SFOAEs. Statistical analyses revealed a significant correlation between SFOAE delay-based tuning and PTCs at 4 kHz, but not 1 kHz. Lastly, SFOAE delay-based tuning estimates showed better intra- and intersession repeatability compared to PTCs. Conclusions SFOAE phase-gradient delays reflect aspects of cochlear mechanical tuning, in that a frequency dependence similar to that of basilar membrane tuning was observed. Furthermore, the significant correlation with PTCs at 4 kHz and the high repeatability of SFOAE-based tuning measures offer promise of an objective, nonbehavioral assay of tuning in human ears.
刺激频率耳声发射(SFOAE)的相位延迟已被提议作为一种无创、客观和快速的方法,用于估计耳蜗机械调谐。然而,由于对 SFOAE 延迟调谐估计的稳定性及其与行为调谐测量的关系理解不足,SFOAE 的临床应用受到了阻碍。因此,本研究的目的是:(a)研究 SFOAE 延迟调谐估计与同时掩蔽的心理物理调谐曲线(PTC)之间的关系;(b)评估行为和耳声发射测量中调谐估计的跨和内会话重复性。方法:在 24 名听力正常的年轻成年人中,使用两种探测频率(1 kHz 和 4 kHz)收集了三组行为和耳声发射测量数据。对于每个参与者,从 SFOAE 的相位梯度中得出基于延迟的调谐估计。在单次和多次会话中,使用快速扫描 PTC 范式比较了 SFOAE 基和行为基调谐估计。结果:一般来说,对于 PTC 和 SFOAE,4 kHz 的调谐估计比 1 kHz 更尖锐。统计分析显示,在 4 kHz 时,SFOAE 基于延迟的调谐与 PTC 之间存在显著相关性,但在 1 kHz 时则不存在。最后,SFOAE 基于延迟的调谐估计比 PTC 具有更好的内和跨会话可重复性。结论:SFOAE 相位梯度延迟反映了耳蜗机械调谐的某些方面,因为观察到与基底膜调谐相似的频率依赖性。此外,在 4 kHz 时与 PTC 的显著相关性以及 SFOAE 基调谐测量的高重复性为客观、非行为的人耳调谐评估提供了希望。