“再来一次”：为什么复制一些与 COVID-19 相关的证据综合是有意义的。
"One more time": why replicating some syntheses of evidence relevant to COVID-19 makes sense.
机构信息
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Bruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Campbell Collaboration, Oslo, Norway; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa.
出版信息
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;125:179-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 May 25.
Abstract
• Given the urgent need for credible answers to high-priority questions about the health and social impacts of COVID-19, many systematic reviewers seek to contribute their skills and expertise. • Rather than embarking on unnecessary, duplicate reviews, we encourage the evidence synthesis community to prioritise purposeful replication of systematic reviews of evidence relevant to COVID-19. • We explain why replication of systematic reviews is important, how to carry out a replication, and when to consider replication of reviews.
摘要
• 鉴于人们迫切需要可信的答案来解答有关 COVID-19 的健康和社会影响的高优先级问题，许多系统评价者都希望贡献自己的技能和专业知识。 • 我们鼓励证据综合社区优先对与 COVID-19 相关的证据进行有目的的系统评价复制，而不是开展不必要的重复评价。 • 我们解释了为什么复制系统评价很重要，如何进行复制，以及何时考虑对评价进行复制。
相似文献
1
"One more time": why replicating some syntheses of evidence relevant to COVID-19 makes sense.“再来一次”：为什么复制一些与 COVID-19 相关的证据综合是有意义的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;125:179-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
Keeping Up With Emerging Evidence in (Almost) Real Time.紧跟（几乎）实时涌现的证据。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;173(2):153-154. doi: 10.7326/M20-2627. Epub 2020 May 5.
3
Rapid reviews for rapid decision-making during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, Norway, 2020.在 2020 年冠状病毒病（COVID-19）大流行期间快速决策的快速审查，挪威。
Euro Surveill. 2020 May;25(19). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.19.2000687.
4
Cochrane Corner: Coronavirus (COVID-19): remote care through telehealth.考科蓝角落：冠状病毒（COVID-19）：通过远程医疗进行远程护理
J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;12(2):184-185. doi: 10.1071/HC15951.
5
This newly recognized coronavirus makes one wonder why we were so unprepared.这种新发现的冠状病毒让人不禁要问，我们为何如此毫无准备。
Croat Med J. 2020 Apr 30;61(2):201-204. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.201.
6
Identity, politics, and the pandemic: Why is COVID-19 a disaster for feminism(s)?身份认同、政治与大流行：为何新冠疫情对女权主义构成灾难？
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2020 Oct 13;42(4):49. doi: 10.1007/s40656-020-00346-7.
7
Prevalence of depression during the SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 pandemics: A protocol for overview of systematic reviews.非典、中东呼吸综合征和新冠疫情期间抑郁症的患病率：系统评价概述方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 18;99(38):e22235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022235.
8
Covering covid-19: stories from 's news desk.报道新冠疫情：来自……新闻编辑部的故事。 （原文中“'s news desk”部分表述不完整，可能影响更准确理解，这里只能按现有内容翻译）
BMJ. 2020 Aug 21;370:m2577. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2577.
9
Considerations and Future Directions for Conducting Clinical Research With Pediatric Populations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在新冠疫情期间针对儿科人群开展临床研究的考量与未来方向
J Pediatr Psychol. 2020 Aug 1;45(7):720-724. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa055.
10
Why is COVID-19 so mild in children?为什么新冠病毒感染在儿童中症状如此轻微？
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Jun;109(6):1082-1083. doi: 10.1111/apa.15271. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
引用本文的文献
1
Extent and nature of duplication in PROSPERO using COVID-19-related registrations: a retrospective investigation and survey.PROSPERO 中 COVID-19 相关注册研究的重复程度和性质：一项回顾性调查和调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):e061862. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061862.
2
Systematic reviews of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 continue to be poorly conducted and reported: a systematic review.COVID-19 恢复期血浆的系统评价继续存在方法学和报告质量差的问题：一项系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;151:53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
3
Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency.大多数已发表的关于瑞德西韦治疗 COVID-19 的系统评价都是多余的，且缺乏时效性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;146:22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
4
Methodological assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on COVID-19: A meta-epidemiological study.方法学评估系统评价和荟萃分析 COVID-19：一项荟萃流行病学研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;27(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1111/jep.13578. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence.REPRISE 项目：评估证据综合中再现性和可重复性的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 16;10(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01670-0.
6
"NEVER LET A CRISIS GO TO WASTE": HOW SCIENCE HAS RESPONDED TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.“绝不让危机被浪费”：科学如何应对新冠疫情。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;131:A5-A6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.001.
7
The mass production of systematic reviews about COVID-19: An analysis of PROSPERO records.大规模生产关于 COVID-19 的系统评价：PROSPERO 记录分析。
J Evid Based Med. 2021 Feb;14(1):56-64. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12426. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
8
Assessment of Duplicate Evidence in Systematic Reviews of Imaging Findings of Children With COVID-19.COVID-19 患儿影像学检查结果的系统评价中重复证据的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032690. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32690.
9
Rapid Scoping Review of Laparoscopic Surgery Guidelines During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Appraisal Using a Simple Quality Appraisal Tool "EMERGE".COVID-19大流行期间腹腔镜手术指南的快速范围审查及使用简单质量评估工具“EMERGE”进行评估
Indian J Surg. 2020 Oct;82(5):930-940. doi: 10.1007/s12262-020-02596-y. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
10
Developing Guidelines Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.制定 COVID-19 大流行之前、期间和之后的指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Dec 15;173(12):1012-1014. doi: 10.7326/M20-4907. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
本文引用的文献
1
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: an overview of systematic reviews.冠状病毒病（COVID-19）大流行：系统评价概述。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 4;21(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06214-4.
2
Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: a protocol for a living systematic review with network meta-analysis including individual patient data (The LIVING Project).干预措施治疗 COVID-19：包含个体患者数据的活系统评价与网络荟萃分析的方案（LIVING 项目）。
Syst Rev. 2020 May 9;9(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01371-0.
3
Epidemiology of and Risk Factors for Coronavirus Infection in Health Care Workers: A Living Rapid Review.医护人员中冠状病毒感染的流行病学和危险因素：实时快速综述。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;173(2):120-136. doi: 10.7326/M20-1632. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
A real-time dashboard of clinical trials for COVID-19.新冠肺炎临床试验实时信息平台。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jun;2(6):e286-e287. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30086-8. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
5
Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review.单独隔离或与其他公共卫生措施相结合以控制新冠病毒病：一项快速综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 8;4(4):CD013574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013574.
6
What is replication?复制是什么？
PLoS Biol. 2020 Mar 27;18(3):e3000691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study.在两周内使用自动化工具完成了全面的系统回顾：案例研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May;121:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.一场引发全球卫生关注的新型冠状病毒疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
9
Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study.Meta 分析对同一临床问题的回答存在差异：一项 meta 流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;119:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
10
Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines.对系统评价和荟萃分析报告指南进行映射，为未来的报告指南生成了一个全面的项目库。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;118:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.010. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
Zotero 插件