在 2020 年冠状病毒病（COVID-19）大流行期间快速决策的快速审查，挪威。
Rapid reviews for rapid decision-making during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, Norway, 2020.
机构信息
Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
出版信息
Euro Surveill. 2020 May;25(19). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.19.2000687.
Abstract
In response to urgent needs for updated evidence for decision-making on various aspects related to coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the Norwegian Institute of Public Health established a rapid review team. Using simplified processes and shortcuts, this team produces summary reviews on request within 1-3 days that inform advice provided by the institute. All reviews are published with explicit messages about the risk of overlooking key evidence or making misguided judgements by using such rapid processes.
摘要
为了应对与冠状病毒病（COVID-19）相关的各个方面的决策更新证据的紧急需求，挪威公共卫生研究所成立了一个快速审查小组。该小组使用简化的流程和快捷方式，在 1-3 天内根据要求生成摘要审查，为该研究所提供的建议提供信息。所有的审查都明确指出，使用这种快速流程可能会忽略关键证据或做出错误的判断，并附有相关风险提示。
相似文献
1
Rapid reviews for rapid decision-making during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, Norway, 2020.在 2020 年冠状病毒病（COVID-19）大流行期间快速决策的快速审查，挪威。
Euro Surveill. 2020 May;25(19). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.19.2000687.
2
Keeping Up With Emerging Evidence in (Almost) Real Time.紧跟（几乎）实时涌现的证据。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;173(2):153-154. doi: 10.7326/M20-2627. Epub 2020 May 5.
3
A Framework for Evidence Synthesis Programs to Respond to a Pandemic.应对大流行病的证据综合计划框架。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jul;95(7):1426-1429. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
4
Making Decisions in a COVID-19 World.在新冠疫情的世界中做出决策。
JAMA. 2020 Jul 14;324(2):139-140. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10178.
5
Critical changes to services for TB patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间结核病患者服务的重大变化。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 May 1;24(5):542-544. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.20.0205.
6
Updated rapid risk assessment from ECDC on coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in the EU/EEA and the UK: resurgence of cases.欧洲疾病预防控制中心（ECDC）关于欧盟/欧洲经济区及英国冠状病毒病（COVID-19）大流行的最新快速风险评估：病例再度出现。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Aug;25(32). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.32.2008131.
7
The COVID-19 Pandemic: Critical Care Allocated .新冠疫情：重症监护资源分配
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jul;20(7):6-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754099. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
In Response to COVID-19 Pandemic Physicians Already Know What to Do.应对新冠疫情，医生们已然知道该怎么做。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jul;20(7):9-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754100. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
COVID-19 in Bangladesh: Data deficiency to delayed decision.孟加拉国的新冠肺炎疫情：数据匮乏导致决策延迟。
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010342. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010342.
10
Facing up to the uncertainties of COVID-19.直面新冠疫情的不确定性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):439. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0865-2.
引用本文的文献
1
Addressing evidence needs during health crises in the province of Quebec (Canada): a proposed action plan for rapid evidence synthesis.应对加拿大魁北克省健康危机期间的证据需求：快速证据综合的拟议行动计划。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12204-y.
2
Rapid reviews methods series: assessing the appropriateness of conducting a rapid review.快速综述方法系列：评估进行快速综述的适宜性
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Jan 22;30(1):55-60. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112722.
3
Production and use of rapid responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec (Canada): perspectives from evidence synthesis producers and decision makers.魁北克（加拿大）在 COVID-19 大流行期间快速反应的制定与应用：来自证据综合制定者和决策者的观点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Feb 13;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01105-x.
4
Horizon scanning, rapid reviews and living evidence to support decision-making: lessons from the work of the Critical Intelligence Unit in New South Wales, Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic.地平线扫描、快速审查和实时证据以支持决策：来自澳大利亚新南威尔士州关键情报股在 COVID-19 大流行期间工作的经验教训。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 18;13(5):e071003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071003.
5
Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users.快速评论方法系列：将患者和公众合作伙伴、医疗保健提供者和政策制定者作为知识使用者纳入其中。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):55-61. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112070.
6
[Evidence syntheses in public health: An overview].[公共卫生领域的证据综合：概述]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Dec;175:17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
7
The Pandora's Box of Evidence Synthesis and the case for a living Evidence Synthesis Taxonomy.证据综合的潘多拉魔盒与动态证据综合分类法的理由
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Jun;28(3):148-150. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112065. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
8
Perspectives on the production, and use, of rapid evidence in decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.新冠大流行期间决策中快速证据的产生和使用观点：一项定性研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Feb;28(1):48-57. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111905. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
9
Lessons learnt: Undertaking rapid reviews on public health and social measures during a global pandemic.经验教训：在全球大流行期间对公共卫生和社会措施进行快速审查。
Res Synth Methods. 2022 Sep;13(5):558-572. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1580. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
10
Health communication in and out of public health emergencies: to persuade or to inform?突发公共卫生事件中的健康传播：说服还是告知？
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 5;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00828-z.
本文引用的文献
1
Keep up with the latest coronavirus research.跟上冠状病毒的最新研究进展。
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):193. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00694-1.
2
A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts.快速综述的分类法将报告类型和方法与特定的决策情境联系起来。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;68(12):1451-62.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.036. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
3
Evidence-Based Medicine applied to the control of communicable disease incidents when evidence is scarce and the time is limited.循证医学在缺乏证据且时间有限的情况下应用于传染病事件的控制。
Euro Surveill. 2013 Jun 20;18(25):20507. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.es2013.18.25.20507.
4
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking?支持循证卫生决策的工具（STP）1：什么是循证决策？
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S1.
5
Rationale for systematic reviews.系统评价的基本原理。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):597-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597.
Zotero 插件