• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物制剂治疗重度成人哮喘的比较——真实生活经验

A comparison of biologicals in the treatment of adults with severe asthma - real-life experiences.

作者信息

Kotisalmi Emma, Hakulinen Auli, Mäkelä Mika, Toppila-Salmi Sanna, Kauppi Paula

机构信息

1Respiratory Diseases and Allergology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Inflammation Center, Meilahdentie 2, FI-00029 HUS, P.O. Box 160, Helsinki, Finland.

2Respiratory Diseases and Allergology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Asthma Res Pract. 2020 May 13;6:2. doi: 10.1186/s40733-020-00055-9. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s40733-020-00055-9
PMID:32467765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7222440/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anti-IgE (omalizumab) and anti-IL5/IL5R (reslizumab, mepolizumab and benralizumab) treatments are available for severe allergic and eosinophilic asthma. In these patients, studies have shown beneficial effects in oral corticosteroid use and exacerbations. The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to evaluate the effect of biological therapy on severe asthma and to compare different therapies.

METHODS

We collected and analysed results of anti-IL5/IL5R and anti-IgE therapies for asthma from January 2009 until October 2019 in specialized care. We compared number of exacerbations, asthma symptoms and use of per oral corticosteroids and antimicrobics because of asthma before and during biological therapy, and in a separate analysis need for per oral corticosteroids, antimicrobics or surgery due to upper respiratory tract diseases in asthmatics receiving biologicals. The analyses were done using the Chi square test, T-test or Mann-Whitney U -test, the Kruskall-Wallis test or the Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

Of 64 patients, 40 used continuous per oral corticosteroid therapy prior to biological therapy. The mean daily dose of per oral corticosteroid was reduced in those with anti-IL5/IL5R therapy (- 3.0 mg,  = 0.02). The number of annual per oral corticosteroid courses decreased in both the anti-IL5/IL5R (- 2.8 courses,  < 0.05) and anti-IgE groups (- 1.3 courses,  < 0.05). The number of annual antibiotic courses (- 0.7 courses,  = 0.04) and total number of exacerbation events (- 4.4 events/year,  < 0.05) were reduced in the anti-IL5/IL5R group. In the 55 asthma patients analysed for upper respiratory tract findings, the results suggested a reduction in need for chronic rhinosinusitis surgery during biological therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Results with biological therapies in this real-life clinical setting are comparable to those reported in clinical trials. Biological therapy reduces exacerbations and per oral corticosteroid use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04158050, retrospectively registered 6.11.2019.

摘要

背景

抗IgE(奥马珠单抗)和抗IL-5/IL-5R(瑞利珠单抗、美泊利单抗和贝那利珠单抗)疗法可用于治疗重度过敏性和嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘。在这些患者中,研究显示这些疗法在口服糖皮质激素使用和病情加重方面具有有益效果。这项回顾性单中心研究的目的是评估生物疗法对重度哮喘的疗效,并比较不同疗法。

方法

我们收集并分析了2009年1月至2019年10月在专科护理中针对哮喘的抗IL-5/IL-5R和抗IgE疗法的结果。我们比较了生物疗法之前和期间因哮喘导致的病情加重次数、哮喘症状以及口服糖皮质激素和抗菌药物的使用情况,并且在另一项分析中,比较了接受生物制剂治疗的哮喘患者因上呼吸道疾病而需要口服糖皮质激素、抗菌药物或进行手术的情况。分析采用卡方检验、T检验或曼-惠特尼U检验、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验或威尔科克森检验。

结果

在64例患者中,40例在生物疗法之前使用持续口服糖皮质激素治疗。接受抗IL-5/IL-5R疗法的患者口服糖皮质激素的日均剂量降低(-3.0毫克,P = 0.02)。抗IL-5/IL-5R组(-2.8个疗程,P < 0.05)和抗IgE组(-1.3个疗程,P < 0.05)的年度口服糖皮质激素疗程数均减少。抗IL-5/IL-5R组的年度抗生素疗程数减少(-0.7个疗程,P = 0.04),病情加重事件总数减少(-4.4次/年,P < 0.05)。在对55例哮喘患者进行的上呼吸道检查结果分析中,结果表明在生物疗法期间慢性鼻窦炎手术需求减少。

结论

在这种现实临床环境中生物疗法的结果与临床试验中报告的结果相当。生物疗法可减少病情加重次数和口服糖皮质激素的使用。

试验注册

NCT04158050,于2019年11月6日进行回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c54/7222440/0843439a4269/40733_2020_55_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c54/7222440/0843439a4269/40733_2020_55_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c54/7222440/0843439a4269/40733_2020_55_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of biologicals in the treatment of adults with severe asthma - real-life experiences.生物制剂治疗重度成人哮喘的比较——真实生活经验
Asthma Res Pract. 2020 May 13;6:2. doi: 10.1186/s40733-020-00055-9. eCollection 2020.
2
A comparison of the impact of anti-IL5/5r therapies in allergic versus non-allergic patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in a real-life setting.在现实环境中,抗IL5/5R疗法对重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的过敏患者与非过敏患者的影响比较。
J Asthma. 2025 Feb;62(2):319-327. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2400607. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
3
Anti-IL5/IL5R Treatment in COPD: Should We Target Oral Corticosteroid-Dependent Patients?COPD 中的抗 IL-5/IL-5R 治疗:我们是否应该针对口服皮质激素依赖的患者?
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 May 5;18:755-763. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S370165. eCollection 2023.
4
Anti-IL5 therapies for asthma.用于哮喘的抗白细胞介素-5疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 21;9(9):CD010834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010834.pub3.
5
Impact of Anti-IL5 Therapies on Patients with Severe Uncontrolled Asthma and Possible Predictive Biomarkers of Response: A Real-Life Study.抗白细胞介素 5 治疗对严重未控制哮喘患者的影响及可能的反应预测生物标志物:一项真实世界研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 19;24(3):2011. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032011.
6
Upper and lower airway inflammation in severe asthmatics: a guide for a precision biologic treatment.严重哮喘患者的上下气道炎症:精准生物治疗的指导。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620965151. doi: 10.1177/1753466620965151.
7
Increase in FeNO Levels Following IL5/IL5R-Targeting Therapies in Severe Asthma: A Case Series.重度哮喘患者接受IL5/IL5R靶向治疗后呼出气一氧化氮水平升高:病例系列
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 May 19;15:691-701. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S358877. eCollection 2022.
8
Oral corticosteroid sparing effects of anti-IL5/ anti-IL5 receptor treatment after 2 years of treatment.抗 IL-5/抗 IL-5 受体治疗 2 年后对口服皮质类固醇的节省作用。
Respir Med. 2021 Jan;176:106260. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106260. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
9
Real-world study in severe eosinophilic asthma patients refractory to anti-IL5 biological agents treated with benralizumab in Spain (ORBE study).西班牙接受贝那鲁单抗治疗对 IL-5 生物制剂难治的严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的真实世界研究(ORBE 研究)。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Dec 18;21(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01785-z.
10
Effect of fixed-dose subcutaneous reslizumab on asthma exacerbations in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma and corticosteroid sparing in patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma: results from two phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.固定剂量皮下注射瑞利珠单抗对重度未控制哮喘患者哮喘恶化的影响和对口服糖皮质激素依赖哮喘患者糖皮质激素节省作用的影响:两项 3 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):461-474. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30372-8. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Monoclonal antibodies in severe asthma: outcomes from real-world data.重度哮喘中的单克隆抗体:来自真实世界数据的结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 11;12:1635688. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1635688. eCollection 2025.
2
Achieving remission in severe asthma.实现重度哮喘的缓解
Chin Med J Pulm Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun 13;3(2):77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.pccm.2025.05.001. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Biologic Therapies for Severe Asthma: Current Insights and Future Directions.重症哮喘的生物疗法:当前见解与未来方向

本文引用的文献

1
Management of severe asthma: a European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline.重度哮喘的管理:欧洲呼吸学会/美国胸科学会指南
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jan 2;55(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00588-2019. Print 2020 Jan.
2
Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52): results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trials.度普利尤单抗治疗伴有鼻息肉的重度慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的疗效和安全性(LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 和 LIBERTY NP SINUS-52):两项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组 3 期临床试验的结果。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1638-1650. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31881-1. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
3
J Clin Med. 2025 May 2;14(9):3153. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093153.
4
Outcomes of biological therapy in patients with severe asthma with chronic rhinosinusitis in Saudi Arabia: patients with nasal polyps versus those without nasal polyps.沙特阿拉伯严重哮喘合并慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者接受生物治疗的结局:伴鼻息肉与不伴鼻息肉患者的比较。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03139-x.
5
Comparison between clinical trials and real-world evidence studies on biologics for severe asthma.比较生物制剂治疗严重哮喘的临床试验和真实世界证据研究。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Nov;50(11):3000605221133689. doi: 10.1177/03000605221133689.
6
The burden of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and its relation to asthma in Finland.芬兰鼻息肉型慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的负担及其与哮喘的关系。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2022 Oct 9;12(10):e12200. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12200. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Complete response to anti-interleukin-5 biologics in a real-life setting: results from the nationwide Danish Severe Asthma Register.在实际临床环境中对抗白细胞介素-5生物制剂的完全缓解:来自丹麦全国严重哮喘登记处的结果
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Oct 4;8(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00238-2022. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Real-world efficacy of treatment with benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab for severe asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.真实世界中贝那鲁肽、度普利尤单抗、美泊利单抗和瑞利珠单抗治疗严重哮喘的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2022 May;52(5):616-627. doi: 10.1111/cea.14112. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
9
Saudi Arabian real-life experience with biologic therapy in severe asthma.沙特阿拉伯在重度哮喘生物治疗方面的实际经验。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2021 Dec 29;16(1):807. doi: 10.4081/mrm.2021.807. eCollection 2021 Jan 15.
10
Impact of type 2 targeting biologics on acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis.2 型靶向生物制剂对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎急性加重的影响。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2021 Sep 1;42(5):417-424. doi: 10.2500/aap.2021.42.210058.
Long-term Safety and Clinical Benefit of Mepolizumab in Patients With the Most Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: The COSMEX Study.美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的长期安全性和临床获益:COSMEX 研究。
Clin Ther. 2019 Oct;41(10):2041-2056.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
4
Biologic Agents for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.生物制剂治疗伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2019 Mar;33(2):203-211. doi: 10.1177/1945892418814768. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
5
Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma - a systematic review and meta-analysis.美泊利珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗抗白细胞介素-5治疗重度哮喘的疗效、不良事件及药物间比较——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Clin Respir J. 2018 Nov 7;5(1):1536097. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2018.1536097. eCollection 2018.
6
Type 2 immunity in asthma.哮喘中的2型免疫
World Allergy Organ J. 2018 Jun 26;11(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40413-018-0192-5. eCollection 2018.
7
Tralokinumab for severe, uncontrolled asthma (STRATOS 1 and STRATOS 2): two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials.特利鲁单抗治疗重症、未控制哮喘(STRATOS 1 和 STRATOS 2):两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Jul;6(7):511-525. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30184-X. Epub 2018 May 20.
8
Omalizumab effectiveness in patients with severe allergic asthma according to blood eosinophil count: the STELLAIR study.奥马珠单抗治疗血嗜酸性粒细胞计数水平不同的重度过敏性哮喘患者的疗效:STELLAIR 研究。
Eur Respir J. 2018 May 10;51(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02523-2017. Print 2018 May.
9
Nordic consensus statement on the systematic assessment and management of possible severe asthma in adults.北欧关于成人可能的重度哮喘系统评估与管理的共识声明。
Eur Clin Respir J. 2018 Mar 6;5(1):1440868. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2018.1440868. eCollection 2018.
10
Reference values of inspiratory spirometry for Finnish adults.芬兰成年人吸气式肺量计的参考值。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2018 Jul;78(4):245-252. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2018.1439185. Epub 2018 Mar 7.