Department of Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2020 Jul;148(3):509-517. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03542-4. Epub 2020 May 28.
Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) remains an important component of treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases (BrM) but is associated with significant neurotoxicity and memory impairment. Although RTOG 0614 demonstrated that administration of memantine to patients receiving WBRT may reduce radiation-associated cognitive decline, prior literature has suggested that radiation oncologists are hesitant to prescribe memantine. We sought to assess the frequency of memantine prescription in patients managed with non-stereotactic, brain-directed radiation for BrM.
Patients > 65 years old with newly diagnosed BrM between 2007 and 2016 receiving non-stereotactic, brain-directed radiation (including WBRT) were identified using the SEER-Medicare database. Receipt of memantine with non-stereotactic, brain-directed radiation was defined as any Part D claim for memantine 30 days before or after initiation of non-stereotactic, brain-directed radiation. Clinical and demographic variables among patients who did and did not receive memantine were compared.
Between 2007 and 2016, we identified 6220 patients with BrM receiving non-stereotactic, brain-directed radiation. Only 2.20% of patients (n = 137) received memantine with radiation. Rates were 1.10% versus 5.14% in the period preceding (2007-2013) and following (2014-2016) the publication of RTOG 0614, respectively. Overall utilization of memantine remained low across several clinical, demographic, and prognostic variables.
Despite phase 3 evidence supporting memantine utilization among patients receiving WBRT, our population-based study indicates that rates of memantine prescription are strikingly low, although memantine utilization seems to be increasing since publication of RTOG 0614. Further investigation is needed to identify provider and practice-related barriers preventing incorporation of memantine into management paradigms.
全脑放射治疗(WBRT)仍然是治疗多发性脑转移瘤(BrM)患者的重要组成部分,但与显著的神经毒性和记忆损伤有关。尽管 RTOG 0614 表明,在接受 WBRT 的患者中给予美金刚可能会降低与放射相关的认知下降,但先前的文献表明,放射肿瘤学家不愿意开美金刚。我们试图评估在接受非立体定向、脑定向放射治疗 BrM 的患者中开美金刚的频率。
使用 SEER-Medicare 数据库,确定了 2007 年至 2016 年间新诊断为 BrM 的年龄大于 65 岁的患者,这些患者接受了非立体定向、脑定向放射治疗(包括 WBRT)。使用非立体定向、脑定向放射治疗时开具美金刚的定义为在开始非立体定向、脑定向放射治疗前后 30 天内任何美金刚的 Part D 索赔。比较了接受和美金刚治疗的患者的临床和人口统计学变量。
在 2007 年至 2016 年间,我们确定了 6220 例接受非立体定向、脑定向放射治疗的 BrM 患者。只有 2.20%的患者(n=137)在接受放射治疗时同时服用了美金刚。在 RTOG 0614 发表之前(2007-2013 年)和之后(2014-2016 年),这一比例分别为 1.10%和 5.14%。在几个临床、人口统计学和预后变量中,美金刚的总体利用率仍然很低。
尽管有 3 期证据支持 WBRT 患者使用美金刚,但我们的基于人群的研究表明,美金刚的处方率极低,尽管自 RTOG 0614 发表以来,美金刚的使用率似乎有所增加。需要进一步调查,以确定阻碍将美金刚纳入管理模式的提供者和实践相关障碍。