Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital , Leeds, UK.
NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds, UK.
Scand J Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;49(5):361-370. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2020.1732458. Epub 2020 May 29.
: SB4, SB2, and SB5 are biosimilars of etanercept (ETN), infliximab (INF), and adalimumab (ADA), respectively. This pooled analysis evaluated the immunogenicity of these treatments across three phase III randomized controlled trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). : Patients had to have at least one anti-drug antibody (ADAb) assessment up to the time of the primary endpoint from each study (week 24 in SB4 and SB5 studies; week 30 in SB2 study). The effect of ADAbs on American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response and the incidences of injection-site reactions (ISRs)/infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were evaluated. : The study included 1709 patients. The cumulative incidences of ADAbs were 30.3% in the all-treatments-combined group, 29.1% in the biosimilars combined group, and 31.5% in the reference products combined group. ACR20 response rates were significantly lower in ADAb-positive patients in the all-treatments-combined [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.77 (1.37, 2.27), p < 0.0001], biosimilars combined [2.24 (1.53, 3.30), p < 0.0001], and reference products combined [1.49 (1.06, 2.09), p = 0.0225] groups. ADAb-positive patients also had a higher likelihood of developing ISRs/IRRs in the all-treatments-combined group [0.56 (0.31, 1.01), p = 0.0550], predominantly due to the results observed with SB2 + INF combined rather than with SB4 + ETN or SB5 + ADA combined. : In this pooled analysis, ADAbs were associated with reduced efficacy in patients with RA treated with biosimilars (SB4, SB2, and SB5) or their reference products (ETN, INF, and ADA). ADAbs were associated with an increased incidence of ISRs/IRRs in those treated with SB2 + INF. Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT01936181 (SB2 study), NCT01895309 (SB4 study), and NCT02167139 (SB5 study).
SB4、SB2 和 SB5 分别是依那西普(ETN)、英夫利昔单抗(INF)和阿达木单抗(ADA)的生物类似药。这项汇总分析评估了这三种治疗方法在三项类风湿关节炎(RA)三期随机对照试验中的免疫原性。
患者必须在每项研究的主要终点时间之前进行至少一次抗药物抗体(ADA)评估(SB4 和 SB5 研究为第 24 周;SB2 研究为第 30 周)。评估 ADAbs 对美国风湿病学会 20%(ACR20)应答和注射部位反应(ISR)/输注相关反应(IRR)发生率的影响。
该研究共纳入 1709 名患者。在所有治疗联合组中,ADAbs 的累积发生率为 30.3%,在生物类似药联合组中为 29.1%,在参比产品联合组中为 31.5%。在所有治疗联合组[比值比(95%置信区间)1.77(1.37,2.27),p<0.0001]、生物类似药联合组[2.24(1.53,3.30),p<0.0001]和参比产品联合组[1.49(1.06,2.09),p=0.0225]中,ADAb 阳性患者的 ACR20 应答率显著降低。ADAb 阳性患者在所有治疗联合组[0.56(0.31,1.01),p=0.0550]中发生 ISR/IRR 的可能性也更高,主要是由于观察到 SB2+INF 联合用药的结果,而不是 SB4+ETN 或 SB5+ADA 联合用药的结果。
在这项汇总分析中,ADAbs 与 RA 患者接受生物类似药(SB4、SB2 和 SB5)或参比产品(ETN、INF 和 ADA)治疗的疗效降低相关。ADAbs 与 SB2+INF 治疗患者的 ISR/IRR 发生率增加相关。临床试验注册号:NCT01936181(SB2 研究)、NCT01895309(SB4 研究)和 NCT02167139(SB5 研究)。