Suppr超能文献

接触小说对归因复杂性、自我中心偏差和社会感知准确性的影响。

The effect of exposure to fiction on attributional complexity, egocentric bias and accuracy in social perception.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.

Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233378. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

We investigated the effects of long-term exposure to literary and popular fiction on attributional complexity, egocentric bias and accuracy. Results of a pre-registered study showed that exposure to literary fiction is positively associated with scores on the attributional complexity scale. Literary fiction is also associated with accuracy in mentalizing, measured via the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test, and with accuracy in predicting average social attitudes. The predicted negative association between literary fiction and egocentric bias emerged only when education and gender were controlled for-a covariance analysis that was not pre-registered. Exposure to popular fiction is associated solely with attributional complexity, but negatively. We discuss the significance of these findings in the context of the emerging literature regarding the relationship between fiction and social cognition.

摘要

我们研究了长期接触文学和通俗小说对归因复杂性、自我中心偏差和准确性的影响。一项预先注册的研究结果表明,接触文学小说与归因复杂性量表的得分呈正相关。文学小说也与通过“读心测试”衡量的心理理论准确性以及预测平均社会态度的准确性相关。只有在控制了教育和性别后,文学小说和自我中心偏差之间的预测负相关才会出现——这是一个没有预先注册的协方差分析。接触通俗小说仅与归因复杂性相关,但呈负相关。我们在关于小说和社会认知之间关系的新兴文献背景下讨论了这些发现的意义。

相似文献

1
The effect of exposure to fiction on attributional complexity, egocentric bias and accuracy in social perception.
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233378. eCollection 2020.
2
Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):e46-e54. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000064. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
4
Exposure to Literary Fiction Is Associated With Lower Psychological Essentialism.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 8;12:662940. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662940. eCollection 2021.
5
The Use of "Literary Fiction" to Promote Mentalizing Ability.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 4;11(8):e0160254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160254. eCollection 2016.
6
Reading Literary Fiction Is Associated With a More Complex Worldview.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Sep;49(9):1408-1420. doi: 10.1177/01461672221106059. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
8
Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind.
Science. 2013 Oct 18;342(6156):377-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1239918. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
9
Is reading fiction associated with a higher mind-reading ability? Two conceptual replication studies in Japan.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 22;18(6):e0287542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287542. eCollection 2023.
10
Reading fiction and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default network.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Feb;11(2):215-24. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv114. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliotherapy and Schizophrenia: A Stanghellinian Perspective.
Psychopathology. 2025 Mar 25:1-11. doi: 10.1159/000545471.
2
The effects of reading and watching fiction on the development of social cognition: a systematic review.
Dement Neuropsychol. 2023 Dec 11;17:e20230066. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0066. eCollection 2023.
3
Introspective self-narrative modulates the neuronal response during the emphatic process: an event-related potentials (ERPs) study.
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Oct;240(10):2725-2738. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06441-4. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Exposure to Literary Fiction Is Associated With Lower Psychological Essentialism.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 8;12:662940. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662940. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Reading literary fiction can improve theory of mind.
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Sep;2(9):604. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0408-2.
2
Achievement at school and socioeconomic background-an educational perspective.
NPJ Sci Learn. 2018 Mar 23;3:5. doi: 10.1038/s41539-018-0022-0. eCollection 2018.
3
Panero et al. (2016): Failure to replicate methods caused the failure to replicate results.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Mar;112(3):e1-e4. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000072.
4
The Use of "Literary Fiction" to Promote Mentalizing Ability.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 4;11(8):e0160254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160254. eCollection 2016.
5
Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
6
Reading ability and print exposure: item response theory analysis of the author recognition test.
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1095-1109. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0534-3.
7
Embers of society: Firelight talk among the Ju/'hoansi Bushmen.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 30;111(39):14027-35. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404212111. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
8
Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind.
Science. 2013 Oct 18;342(6156):377-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1239918. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
9
Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
10
Grist and mills: on the cultural origins of cultural learning.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2181-91. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0120.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验