Pearce Casey E, Kiel Elizabeth J
Department of Psychology, Miami University.
J Fam Psychol. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1037/fam0001387.
The family stress model provides a theoretical framework for understanding relations among economic hardship, parental distress, family relationships and behavior, and child outcomes. The present study aimed to replicate its paths with predictors and mechanisms studied before and over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, and child problematic coping as the outcome. We also examined how sources of family resilience related directly to or moderated relations among family stress model variables. Participants included 170 families of predominantly non-Hispanic White background with varying socioeconomic circumstances. Assessments occurred across early childhood (age 2-4 years, prepandemic) and at two points during the pandemic (child mean ages = 7.32 and 7.80 years, respectively). Mothers completed laboratory observation (maternal warmth) and surveys prior to (income-to-needs, social support) and during (economic stress, maternal distress, negative parenting, child coping) the pandemic. Unexpectedly, higher prepandemic income-to-needs predicted greater maternal distress early in the pandemic. Prepandemic social support (inversely) and early pandemic maternal distress (positively) are related to early pandemic negative parenting. Prepandemic income-to-needs predicted early pandemic negative parenting indirectly through early pandemic maternal distress. When mothers reported a high number of positive changes during the pandemic, negative parenting predicted child involuntary engagement coping midpandemic. Social support predicted lower child involuntary engagement coping through lower negative parenting. Results replicated the risk path between parental distress and negative parenting, and extended risk to higher income families. Findings suggest that the family stress model provides a theoretical foundation from which to study risk and resilience processes in families during the COVID-19 pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
家庭压力模型提供了一个理论框架,用于理解经济困难、父母困扰、家庭关系与行为以及儿童结果之间的关系。本研究旨在重现其路径,其中预测因素和机制是之前以及在新冠疫情期间研究过的,且以儿童问题应对作为结果。我们还研究了家庭复原力的来源如何直接关联或调节家庭压力模型变量之间的关系。参与者包括170个主要为非西班牙裔白人背景、社会经济状况各异的家庭。评估在幼儿期(2至4岁,疫情前)以及疫情期间的两个时间点进行(儿童平均年龄分别为7.32岁和7.80岁)。母亲们在疫情前(收入需求比、社会支持)和疫情期间(经济压力、母亲困扰、消极育儿、儿童应对)完成了实验室观察(母亲温暖度)和问卷调查。出乎意料的是,疫情前较高的收入需求比预示着疫情早期母亲有更大的困扰。疫情前的社会支持(呈负相关)和疫情早期母亲的困扰(呈正相关)与疫情早期的消极育儿有关。疫情前的收入需求比通过疫情早期母亲的困扰间接预示着疫情早期的消极育儿。当母亲报告在疫情期间有大量积极变化时,消极育儿预示着疫情中期儿童的非自愿参与应对。社会支持通过较低的消极育儿预示着较低的儿童非自愿参与应对。研究结果重现了父母困扰与消极育儿之间的风险路径,并将风险扩展到高收入家庭。研究结果表明,家庭压力模型为研究新冠疫情期间家庭中的风险和复原力过程提供了理论基础。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)