• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人与基因。以基因为中心的进化心理学与以人为导向的心理学科学方法相容吗?

Persons and Genes. Is a Gene-Centered Evolutionary Psychology Compatible with a Person-Oriented Approach to Psychological Science?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lund University, Box 213, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):189-197. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09548-x.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-020-09548-x
PMID:32472483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7801316/
Abstract

According to Zagaria et al. (2020), evolutionary psychology may be the meta-theory that is needed if psychological science is to enter a paradigmatic stage. Other writers have suggested that what is needed is a person-oriented approach, which focuses on the person as a complex system that needs to be studied (1) as a whole (holism), (2) as an intentional agent in interaction with its environment (interactionism), and (3) in terms of his or her individual characteristics and development (idiographic focus). The purpose of the present paper is to discuss the compatibility of these two suggestions. A brief analysis of some formulations central to Dawkins' gene-centered approach (e.g., "the intricate interdependence of genes", and the dependence of genes on their environment) suggests that it is quite compatible with holism and interactionism; and applications such as genetic genealogy illustrate the possibility of a person-oriented genetics. It is argued that these two perspectives are not only compatible, but also complementary. Without a complement in the form of a person-oriented perspective, a gene-centered evolutionary psychology will at best be able to produce a general understanding of the psychological potentials that inhere in the human gene pool. It will not, however, lead to any understanding of the unique profiles of psychological potentials that are produced by a re-combination of autosomal DNA at the origin of each specific individual person, and that develop over time in interaction with the environment. The latter requires that the gene-centered view is complemented with a person-oriented approach.

摘要

根据 Zagaria 等人(2020 年)的观点,如果心理科学要进入范式阶段,进化心理学可能是需要的元理论。其他作者认为,需要的是一种以人为中心的方法,该方法侧重于将人作为一个复杂系统进行研究:(1) 作为一个整体(整体论),(2) 作为与环境相互作用的有意图的主体(相互作用论),以及 (3) 从个体特征和发展的角度(个别论焦点)。本文的目的是讨论这两种建议的兼容性。对 Dawkins 以基因为中心的方法的一些核心表述的简要分析(例如,“基因之间错综复杂的相互依存关系”以及基因对环境的依赖性)表明,它与整体论和相互作用论非常兼容;而遗传家谱学等应用则说明了以人为中心的遗传学的可能性。有人认为,这两种观点不仅是兼容的,而且是互补的。如果不以以人为中心的观点作为补充,以基因为中心的进化心理学最多只能对人类基因库中固有的心理潜力产生一般的理解。然而,它不会导致对由每个特定个体起源的常染色体 DNA 的重新组合产生的心理潜力的独特特征的任何理解,也不会导致对这些独特特征的理解,这些特征是在与环境的相互作用中随着时间的推移而发展的。后者要求以基因为中心的观点辅以以人为中心的方法。

相似文献

1
Persons and Genes. Is a Gene-Centered Evolutionary Psychology Compatible with a Person-Oriented Approach to Psychological Science?人与基因。以基因为中心的进化心理学与以人为导向的心理学科学方法相容吗?
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):189-197. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09548-x.
2
From Clay Feet to New Psychology: Starting the Move.从泥足到新心理学:开启转变
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):515-520. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09564-x.
3
Inching Toward a Unified Metatheory for Psychology.心理学统合理论的逐步推进。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):198-211. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09543-2.
4
On the Foundations of Psychology: the Problem Is Grammatical, Not Theoretical.论心理学基础:问题出在语法而非理论。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):181-188. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09569-6.
5
Towards a Person-Oriented Approach to Psychotherapy Research.迈向以患者为导向的心理治疗研究方法。
J Pers Oriented Res. 2019 Dec 30;5(2):65-79. doi: 10.17505/jpor.2019.07. eCollection 2019.
6
Getting Psychology Back Onto Its Feet: the Developmental View of James Mark Baldwin.让心理学重新站稳脚跟:詹姆斯·马克·鲍德温的发展观
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):686-693. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09535-2.
7
The Game of Science and Puzzles of Paradigm.科学游戏与范式之谜。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):167-180. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09563-y.
8
Toward a Cultural Evolutionary Psychology: Why the Evolutionary Approach does not Imply Reductionism or Determinism.走向文化进化心理学:为什么进化方法并不意味着还原论或决定论。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Jun;55(2):225-249. doi: 10.1007/s12124-021-09613-z. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
9
Staying with Questions and Resisting Quick Answers: Commentary on Zagaria, Andò, and Zennaro.带着问题并抵制快速给出答案:对扎加里亚、安多和泽纳罗的评论
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):572-578. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09542-3.
10
Person, Population, Mechanism. Three Main Branches of Psychological Science.人、群体、机制。心理学的三个主要分支。
J Pers Oriented Res. 2023 Dec 7;9(2):75-92. doi: 10.17505/jpor.2023.25814. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Person, Population, Mechanism. A Rejoinder to Critics and an Elaboration of the Three-Branch Model.人、人群、机制。对批评者的回应及三分支模型的阐述
J Pers Oriented Res. 2024 May 23;10(1):68-84. doi: 10.17505/jpor.2024.26295. eCollection 2024.
2
Research on the Effects of Occupational Stress and the Gene on the Psychological Health of Workers in the Xinjiang Desert Oil Field.职业压力与基因对新疆沙漠油田作业人员心理健康的影响研究
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 14;12:737228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737228. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychology: a Giant with Feet of Clay.心理学:一个根基不稳的巨人。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):521-562. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5.
2
A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology.发展性精神病理学研究中的以人为本方法。
Dev Psychopathol. 1997 Spring;9(2):291-319. doi: 10.1017/s095457949700206x.