• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2015-2016 年挪威癌症患者路径纳入相关的患者和肿瘤特征。

Patient and tumour characteristics associated with inclusion in Cancer patient pathways in Norway in 2015-2016.

机构信息

Department of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.

Section of Oncology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2020 May 30;20(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06979-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-020-06979-y
PMID:32473650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7260744/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer patient pathways (CPPs) were implemented in 2015 to reduce waiting time, regional variation in waiting time, and to increase the predictability of cancer care for the patients. The aims of this study were to see if the national target of 70% of all cancer patients being included in a CPP was met, and to identify factors associated with CPP inclusion.

METHODS

All patients registered with a colorectal, lung, breast or prostate cancer diagnosis at the Cancer Registry of Norway in the period 2015-2016 were linked with the Norwegian Patient Registry for CPP information and with Statistics Norway for sociodemographic variables. Multivariable logistic regression examined if the odds of not being included in a CPP were associated with year of diagnosis, age, sex, tumour stage, marital status, education, income, region of residence and comorbidity.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2016, 30,747 patients were diagnosed with colorectal, lung, breast or prostate cancer, of whom 24,429 (79.5%) were included in a CPP. Significant increases in the probability of being included in a CPP were observed for colorectal (79.1 to 86.2%), lung (79.0 to 87.3%), breast (91.5 to 97.2%) and prostate cancer (62.2 to 76.2%) patients (p < 0.001). Increasing age was associated with an increased odds of not being included in a CPP for lung (p < 0.001) and prostate cancer (p < 0.001) patients. Colorectal cancer patients < 50 years of age had a two-fold increase (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.70-2.91) in the odds of not being included in a CPP. The odds of no CPP inclusion were significantly increased for low income colorectal (OR = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.00-1.54) and lung (OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.16-1.99) cancer patients. Region of residence was significantly associated with CPP inclusion (p < 0.001) and the probability, adjusted for case-mix ranged from 62.4% in region West among prostate cancer patients to 97.6% in region North among breast cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The national target of 70% was met within 1 year of CPP implementation in Norway. Although all patients should have equal access to CPPs, a prostate cancer diagnosis, older age, high level of comorbidity or low income were significantly associated with an increased odds of not being included in a CPP.

摘要

背景

癌症患者路径 (CPP) 于 2015 年实施,旨在减少等待时间、降低等待时间的地区差异,并提高患者癌症治疗的可预测性。本研究的目的是确定是否达到了将所有癌症患者的 70%纳入 CPP 的国家目标,并确定与 CPP 纳入相关的因素。

方法

2015 年至 2016 年期间,在挪威癌症登记处登记的结直肠癌、肺癌、乳腺癌或前列腺癌患者,与挪威患者登记处的 CPP 信息以及挪威统计局的社会人口统计学变量相关联。多变量逻辑回归检查了未被纳入 CPP 的几率是否与诊断年份、年龄、性别、肿瘤分期、婚姻状况、教育程度、收入、居住地区和合并症有关。

结果

2015 年至 2016 年间,有 30747 名患者被诊断患有结直肠癌、肺癌、乳腺癌或前列腺癌,其中 24429 名(79.5%)被纳入 CPP。结直肠癌(79.1% 至 86.2%)、肺癌(79.0% 至 87.3%)、乳腺癌(91.5% 至 97.2%)和前列腺癌(62.2% 至 76.2%)患者被纳入 CPP 的概率显著增加(p<0.001)。年龄增加与肺癌(p<0.001)和前列腺癌(p<0.001)患者未被纳入 CPP 的几率增加有关。年龄<50 岁的结直肠癌患者未被纳入 CPP 的几率增加了两倍(OR=2.23,95%CI:1.70-2.91)。收入较低的结直肠癌(OR=1.24,95%CI:1.00-1.54)和肺癌(OR=1.52,95%CI:1.16-1.99)患者未被纳入 CPP 的几率显著增加。居住地区与 CPP 纳入显著相关(p<0.001),调整病例组合后,概率从前列腺癌患者所在的西部地区的 62.4%到乳腺癌患者所在的北部地区的 97.6%不等。

结论

CPP 实施后 1 年内,达到了 70%的国家目标。尽管所有患者都应该平等获得 CPP,但前列腺癌诊断、年龄较大、高合并症或低收入与未被纳入 CPP 的几率增加显著相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d6a/7260744/39cc790d8aca/12885_2020_6979_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d6a/7260744/e57ca7cc80e4/12885_2020_6979_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d6a/7260744/39cc790d8aca/12885_2020_6979_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d6a/7260744/e57ca7cc80e4/12885_2020_6979_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d6a/7260744/39cc790d8aca/12885_2020_6979_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient and tumour characteristics associated with inclusion in Cancer patient pathways in Norway in 2015-2016.2015-2016 年挪威癌症患者路径纳入相关的患者和肿瘤特征。
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 30;20(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06979-y.
2
Compliance with recommended cancer patient pathway timeframes and choice of treatment differed by cancer type and place of residence among cancer patients in Norway in 2015-2016.2015-2016 年,挪威癌症患者的癌症类型和居住地不同,其对推荐的癌症患者路径时间框架的遵守情况和治疗选择也不同。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09306-9.
3
Equitable access to cancer patient pathways in Norway - a national registry-based study.挪威癌症患者通道的公平获取 - 一项基于国家登记的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 25;21(1):1272. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07250-1.
4
Access denied: The relationship between patient insurance status and access to high-volume hospitals.访问被拒绝:患者保险状况与进入高容量医院之间的关系。
Cancer. 2021 Feb 15;127(4):577-585. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33237. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Disparities in Prostate, Lung, Breast, and Colorectal Cancer Survival and Comorbidity Status among Urban American Indians and Alaskan Natives.美国城市印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民在前列腺癌、肺癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌生存率及合并症状况方面的差异。
Cancer Res. 2017 Dec 1;77(23):6770-6776. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0429. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
6
Use of Alternative Medicine for Cancer and Its Impact on Survival.癌症的替代医学治疗及其对生存的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jan 1;110(1). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx145.
7
Evaluating factors associated with unknown SEER Summary Stage 2000 derived from collaborative stage at central registry level.评估与2000年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)总结分期不明相关的因素,该分期由中央登记处层面的协作分期得出。
J Registry Manag. 2012 Fall;39(3):101-6.
8
Survival patterns for the top four cancers in Canada: the effects of age, region and period.加拿大四大癌症的生存模式:年龄、地区和时期的影响。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005 Apr;14(2):91-100. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200504000-00004.
9
Decreasing variation in the use of hospice among older adults with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer.减少乳腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌老年患者临终关怀使用情况的差异。
Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2):116-22. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000108765.86294.1b.
10
Lung cancer treatment is influenced by income, education, age and place of residence in a country with universal health coverage.在全民医保的国家,肺癌的治疗受到收入、教育、年龄和居住地的影响。
Int J Cancer. 2016 Mar 15;138(6):1350-60. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29875. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
What matters to patients with cancer receiving home care at the end of life? A qualitative study comparing patients' and healthcare professionals' views.对于临终时接受居家护理的癌症患者来说,什么才是重要的?一项比较患者与医护人员观点的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2517358. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2517358. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Inclusion in the cancer patient pathway among cancer patients with and without pre-existing mental or substance use disorders: a nationwide register-based study.患有和未患有既往精神或物质使用障碍的癌症患者在癌症患者诊疗流程中的纳入情况:一项基于全国登记处的研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 29;25(1):1991. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23180-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Time intervals and routes to diagnosis for lung cancer in 10 jurisdictions: cross-sectional study findings from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP).10 个司法管辖区肺癌诊断的时间间隔和途径:国际癌症基准伙伴关系(ICBP)的横断面研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 27;9(11):e025895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025895.
2
Decreasing waiting time for treatment before and during implementation of cancer patient pathways in Norway.在挪威实施癌症患者路径之前和期间,减少治疗前的等待时间。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;61:59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 27.
3
Ovarian cancer suspicion, urgent referral and time to diagnosis in Danish general practice: a population-based study.
Extending the concept of total pain to cancer survivorship.
将整体疼痛的概念扩展到癌症幸存者群体。
Front Sociol. 2025 Jan 30;9:1387096. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1387096. eCollection 2024.
4
Geographic and socioeconomic variation in treatment of elderly prostate cancer patients in Norway - a national register-based study.挪威老年前列腺癌患者治疗的地理和社会经济差异——一项基于全国登记的研究。
Res Health Serv Reg. 2024 May 15;3(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s43999-024-00044-y.
5
Have the recent advancements in cancer therapy and survival benefitted patients of all age groups across the Nordic countries? NORDCAN survival analyses 2002-2021.癌症治疗和生存方面的最新进展是否使北欧国家所有年龄段的患者受益?NORDCAN 生存分析 2002-2021。
Acta Oncol. 2024 Apr 10;63:179-191. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.35094.
6
Fast vs. Regular Track for Lung and Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis-Time from Initial Finding to Final Diagnosis and Patient Survival.快速与常规诊断路径对肺癌和胰腺癌的影响:从初始发现到最终诊断和患者生存的时间。
J Med Syst. 2023 Apr 15;47(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01939-y.
7
Assessing how routes to diagnosis vary by the age of patients with cancer: a nationwide register-based cohort study in Denmark.评估癌症患者的诊断途径如何随年龄而变化:丹麦全国基于登记的队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Aug 19;22(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09937-y.
8
The association between sociodemographic factors and time to diagnosis for colorectal cancer in northern Sweden.瑞典北部社会人口因素与结直肠癌诊断时间的相关性。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13687. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13687. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
9
Compliance with recommended cancer patient pathway timeframes and choice of treatment differed by cancer type and place of residence among cancer patients in Norway in 2015-2016.2015-2016 年,挪威癌症患者的癌症类型和居住地不同,其对推荐的癌症患者路径时间框架的遵守情况和治疗选择也不同。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09306-9.
10
Equitable access to cancer patient pathways in Norway - a national registry-based study.挪威癌症患者通道的公平获取 - 一项基于国家登记的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 25;21(1):1272. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07250-1.
丹麦普通实践中卵巢癌的可疑症状、紧急转诊和诊断时间:一项基于人群的研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 18;36(6):751-757. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz013.
4
Diagnostic routes and time intervals for patients with colorectal cancer in 10 international jurisdictions; findings from a cross-sectional study from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP).10个国际司法管辖区结直肠癌患者的诊断途径和时间间隔;来自国际癌症基准伙伴关系(ICBP)的横断面研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 27;8(11):e023870. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023870.
5
Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries.全球癌症生存趋势监测 2000-14 年(CONCORD-3):对来自 71 个国家 322 个基于人群的登记处的 37513025 名诊断患有 18 种癌症之一的患者的个体记录进行分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1023-1075. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Stage-specific incidence and survival of breast cancer in Norway: The implications of changes in coding and classification practice.挪威乳腺癌的特定分期发病率和生存率:编码和分类实践改变的影响。
Breast. 2018 Apr;38:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.12.001. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
7
Prognostic consequences of implementing cancer patient pathways in Denmark: a comparative cohort study of symptomatic cancer patients in primary care.丹麦实施癌症患者路径的预后后果:初级保健中症状性癌症患者的对比队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3623-8.
8
The 2015 National Cancer Program in Sweden: Introducing standardized care pathways in a decentralized system.2015年瑞典国家癌症计划:在分权体系中引入标准化护理路径。
Health Policy. 2016 Dec;120(12):1378-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Tumour stage and implementation of standardised cancer patient pathways: a comparative cohort study.肿瘤分期与标准化癌症患者诊疗路径的实施:一项队列对比研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jun;66(647):e434-43. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684805. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
10
Regional variations in cancer survival: Impact of tumour stage, socioeconomic status, comorbidity and type of treatment in Norway.挪威癌症生存率的地区差异:肿瘤分期、社会经济地位、合并症及治疗类型的影响
Int J Cancer. 2016 May 1;138(9):2190-200. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29967. Epub 2016 Jan 21.