• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受初级预防植入式心脏除颤器(DREAM-ICD)研究的患者的驾驶限制和早期心律失常。

Driving Restrictions and Early Arrhythmias in Patients Receiving a Primary-Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (DREAM-ICD) Study.

机构信息

Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.

Heart Rhythm Services, Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2020 Aug;36(8):1269-1277. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.029. Epub 2020 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.029
PMID:32474110
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend 4 weeks of private driving restriction after implantation of a primary-prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). These driving restrictions result in significant inconvenience and social implications. Advances in medical treatment and ICD programming have lowered the overall rate of device therapies. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of ICD therapies at 30, 60, and 180 days after implantation.

METHODS

Driving Restrictions and Early Arrhythmias in Patients Receiving a Primary-Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (DREAM-ICD) was a retrospective cohort study conducted at 2 Canadian university centres enrolling patients with new implantation of a primary-prevention ICD. Device programming was standardised according to current guidelines. A total of 803 patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

The cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapies at 30, 60, and 180 days were 0.12%, 0.50%, and 0.75%, respectively. There was no syncope during the first 6 months. The median duration to the first appropriate ICD therapy was 208 (range 23-1109) days after implantation. The rate of inappropriate ICD therapies at 30 days was only 0.2%. Overall, < 13.6% of all appropriate ICD therapies occurred within the first 6 months after implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of appropriate ICD therapies within the first 30 days after device insertion is extremely low in contemporary primary prevention cohorts with guideline-concordant device programming. There was no increased risk for ventricular arrhythmia early after ICD insertion. The results of DREAM-ICD suggest the need for a revision of the existing driving restrictions for primary-prevention ICD recipients.

摘要

背景

目前的指南建议在植入一级预防植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)后限制私人驾驶 4 周。这些驾驶限制会带来很大的不便和社会影响。医疗技术和 ICD 编程的进步降低了设备治疗的总体发生率。本研究的目的是评估植入后 30、60 和 180 天 ICD 治疗的发生率。

方法

在加拿大的 2 个大学中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究,名为“接受一级预防植入式心律转复除颤器的驾驶限制和早期心律失常(DREAM-ICD)”,该研究纳入了新植入一级预防 ICD 的患者。根据当前指南对设备编程进行了标准化。共纳入 803 例患者。

结果

植入后 30、60 和 180 天的适当 ICD 治疗累积发生率分别为 0.12%、0.50%和 0.75%。前 6 个月内没有发生晕厥。首次适当 ICD 治疗的中位时间为植入后 208(范围 23-1109)天。植入后 30 天的 ICD 治疗不适当率仅为 0.2%。总的来说,<13.6%的适当 ICD 治疗发生在植入后 6 个月内。

结论

在符合指南的设备编程的当代一级预防队列中,植入后 30 天内适当 ICD 治疗的发生率极低。ICD 植入后早期发生室性心律失常的风险没有增加。DREAM-ICD 的结果表明,需要修订一级预防 ICD 接受者的现有驾驶限制。

相似文献

1
Driving Restrictions and Early Arrhythmias in Patients Receiving a Primary-Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (DREAM-ICD) Study.接受初级预防植入式心脏除颤器(DREAM-ICD)研究的患者的驾驶限制和早期心律失常。
Can J Cardiol. 2020 Aug;36(8):1269-1277. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.029. Epub 2020 May 28.
2
DREAM-ICD-II Study.DREAM-ICD-II 研究。
Circulation. 2022 Mar 8;145(10):742-753. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056471. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
3
Driving following defibrillator implantation: development and pilot results from a nationwide questionnaire.植入除颤器后的驾驶情况:一项全国性问卷调查的开展及初步结果
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0949-3.
4
Driving restrictions after implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: an evidence-based approach.植入式心脏复律除颤器植入术后的驾驶限制:一种基于证据的方法。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Nov;32(21):2678-87. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr161. Epub 2011 Jun 5.
5
Time Course of Subsequent Shocks After Initial Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Discharge and Implications for Driving Restrictions.初始植入式心脏复律除颤器放电后的后续电击时间过程及其对驾驶限制的影响。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 May 1;1(2):181-8. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0386.
6
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks-incidence, effect, and implications for driver licensing.不适当的植入式心脏复律除颤器电击——发生率、影响及对驾驶执照的意义
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;49(3):271-280. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0272-4. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
7
Clinical effect of implantable cardioverter defibrillator replacements: when should you resume driving after an implantable cardioverter defibrillator replacement?植入式心律转复除颤器更换的临床效果:更换植入式心律转复除颤器后何时可以恢复驾驶?
Circ J. 2010 Nov;74(11):2301-7. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0316. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
8
Experiences of driving and driving restrictions in recipients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator--the patient perspective.植入式心脏复律除颤器受者的驾驶体验和驾驶限制——患者视角。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181e0f881.
9
Efficacy of long detection interval implantable cardioverter-defibrillator settings in secondary prevention population: data from the Avoid Delivering Therapies for Nonsustained Arrhythmias in ICD Patients III (ADVANCE III) trial.长检测间期埋藏式心脏转复除颤器设置在二级预防人群中的疗效:来自植入式心脏转复除颤器患者避免治疗非持续心律失常 III 期临床试验(ADVANCE III)的数据。
Circulation. 2014 Jul 22;130(4):308-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009468. Epub 2014 May 16.
10
Programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in primary prevention: Guideline concordance and outcomes.在一级预防中编程植入式心脏复律除颤器:指南一致性和结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jul;17(7):1101-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinguishing Primary Prevention From Secondary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Using Administrative Health and Cardiac Device Registry Data.利用行政健康与心脏设备注册数据区分植入式心脏复律除颤器的一级预防和二级预防
CJC Open. 2024 Mar 7;6(7):876-883. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.02.003. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.加拿大临床实践的不当使用:系统评价。
CMAJ. 2022 Feb 28;194(8):E279-E296. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.211416.