• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入式心脏复律除颤器受者的驾驶体验和驾驶限制——患者视角。

Experiences of driving and driving restrictions in recipients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator--the patient perspective.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Nursing Science, Linköping University, Sweden.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181e0f881.

DOI:10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181e0f881
PMID:20938245
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a lifesaving device for treating patients who have experienced (secondary prevention), or are likely to experience (primary prevention), sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias. Individuals with an ICD are prohibited from driving for a restricted period after the implantation and after recurrence of a ventricular arrhythmia, which may affect the ICD recipient in daily life. The aim of this study was therefore to describe how ICD recipients perceive driving and the driving restriction.

METHODS

Fourteen men and 6 women, aged 43 to 82 years, with driving restrictions due to both secondary and primary ICD indications, were interviewed. Data were analyzed using phenomenography.

RESULTS

The analysis resulted in the main category, the individual's unique relationship to driving, based on the categories: (1) achieving adherence on driving restrictions, (2) emotional influence of driving restriction, and (3) altered views on driving. The information was sometimes conceived as insufficient and unclear, and the willingness to accept the restriction differed. The ICD recipients perceived a loss of independence and changed self-image. Some patients had changed their driving behavior because of uncertainty of their driving abilities or fear of having arrhythmias/shocks while driving. They had different views on their future driving.

CONCLUSIONS

Handling driving restrictions after ICD implantation and shocks is a complex and delicate issue in clinical practice and should be addressed in a dialogue with the ICD recipient. More individualized and structured information and support should be given according to the ICD recipients' experiences and needs.

摘要

背景和目的

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)是一种救生设备,用于治疗因室性心律失常而经历过(二级预防)或可能经历(一级预防)突然心脏死亡的患者。植入 ICD 后以及室性心律失常复发后,有 ICD 的患者在一段时间内被禁止驾驶,这可能会影响 ICD 接受者的日常生活。因此,本研究旨在描述 ICD 接受者对驾驶和驾驶限制的看法。

方法

对 14 名男性和 6 名女性进行了采访,他们年龄在 43 至 82 岁之间,由于二级和一级 ICD 指征都需要限制驾驶。使用现象学方法对数据进行分析。

结果

分析得出了主要类别,即个人对驾驶的独特关系,基于以下类别:(1)实现对驾驶限制的遵守,(2)驾驶限制的情绪影响,和(3)对驾驶的看法改变。信息有时被认为是不充分和不清楚的,对限制的接受意愿也不同。ICD 接受者认为失去了独立性并改变了自我形象。一些患者因为对自己驾驶能力的不确定性或担心在驾驶时出现心律失常/电击而改变了自己的驾驶行为。他们对未来的驾驶有不同的看法。

结论

在 ICD 植入和电击后处理驾驶限制是临床实践中的一个复杂而微妙的问题,应与 ICD 接受者进行对话。应根据 ICD 接受者的经验和需求提供更个性化和结构化的信息和支持。

相似文献

1
Experiences of driving and driving restrictions in recipients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator--the patient perspective.植入式心脏复律除颤器受者的驾驶体验和驾驶限制——患者视角。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181e0f881.
2
ICD: a qualitative study of patient experience the first year after implantation.ICD:植入术后第一年患者体验的定性研究
J Clin Nurs. 2004 Nov;13(8):1008-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01021.x.
3
[Driving restrictions for arrhythmia patients--with special reference to the implantable cardioverter/defibrillator].心律失常患者的驾驶限制——特别提及植入式心脏复律除颤器
Z Kardiol. 1996;85 Suppl 6:115-21.
4
Psychological and clinical problems in young adults with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.植入式心脏复律除颤器青年患者的心理及临床问题
Kardiol Pol. 2008 Oct;66(10):1050-8; discussion 1059-60.
5
Is it safe to allow patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to drive? Learnings from a single center experience.允许植入式心脏复律除颤器患者开车安全吗?来自单中心经验的启示。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Dec;9(12):1241-5. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283108818.
6
Recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in ischaemic secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients: long-term follow-up of the Leiden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study (LOHCAT).缺血性二级预防植入式心律转复除颤器患者室性心律失常的复发:莱顿院外心脏骤停研究(LOHCAT)的长期随访
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jul;30(13):1621-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp234. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
7
Device implant technique and consideration of body image: specific procedures for implantable cardioverter defibrillators in female patients.设备植入技术与身体形象考量:女性患者植入式心脏复律除颤器的特定程序
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):830-5. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.830.
8
[Automobile driving and implantable defibrillators].[汽车驾驶与植入式心脏除颤器]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2005 Apr;98(4):288-93.
9
Outcomes, problems and quality of life with the implantable cardioverter defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器的治疗效果、问题及生活质量
Aust J Adv Nurs. 1999 Jun-Aug;16(4):14-9.
10
Driving and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular arrhythmias: results from the TOVA study.驾驶与植入式心律转复除颤器对室性心律失常的电击治疗:TOVA研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Dec 4;50(23):2233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.059. Epub 2007 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Recommendations for driving after implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation and the use of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator : Different viewpoints around the world.植入式心脏除颤器植入后驾驶建议和可穿戴式心脏除颤器的使用:世界各地的不同观点。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020 Dec;132(23-24):770-781. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01675-0. Epub 2020 May 20.
2
A Review of Driving Restrictions in Patients at Risk of Syncope and Cardiac Arrhythmias Associated with Sudden Incapacity: Differing Global Approaches to Regulation and Risk.晕厥和与突然无行为能力相关的心律失常风险患者驾驶限制综述:全球不同的监管和风险应对方法
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2019 May;8(2):90-98. doi: 10.15420/aer.2019.13.2.
3
Driving following defibrillator implantation: development and pilot results from a nationwide questionnaire.
植入除颤器后的驾驶情况:一项全国性问卷调查的开展及初步结果
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0949-3.
4
Driving restrictions for Dutch patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator : Compliance and associated factors.荷兰植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的驾驶限制:依从性及相关因素。
Neth Heart J. 2018 Feb;26(2):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1067-z.
5
Driving restrictions in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and pacemakers.植入式心脏复律除颤器和起搏器患者的驾驶限制
J Arrhythm. 2017 Dec;33(6):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
6
Evaluating the feasibility of conducting a trial using a patient decision aid in implantable cardioverter defibrillator candidates: a randomized controlled feasibility trial.评估在植入式心脏复律除颤器候选患者中使用患者决策辅助工具进行试验的可行性:一项随机对照可行性试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Nov 21;3:49. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0189-9. eCollection 2017.
7
Perceptions and experiences of patients living with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的认知与体验:一项系统综述与元整合分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Nov 17;14(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0561-0.
8
"Are you still driving?" Metasynthesis of patient preferences for communication with health care providers.“你还在开车吗?”患者对与医疗服务提供者沟通的偏好的元综合研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 May 18;17(4):367-73. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1101078. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
9
Incorporating the patient perspective: a critical review of clinical practice guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.纳入患者视角:对植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗临床实践指南的批判性综述
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Mar;36(2):185-97. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9762-6. Epub 2012 Dec 19.