• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类颗粒细胞中独特的表观遗传衰老特征。

A distinctive epigenetic ageing profile in human granulosa cells.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.

DNRF Center for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun 1;35(6):1332-1345. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa071.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/deaa071
PMID:32474592
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Does women's age affect the DNA methylation (DNAm) profile differently in mural granulosa cells (MGCs) from other somatic cells?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Accumulation of epimutations by age and a higher number of age-related differentially methylated regions (DMR) in MGCs were found compared to leukocytes from the same woman, suggesting that the MGCs have a distinctive epigenetic profile.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The mechanisms underlying the decline in women's fertility from the mid-30s remain to be fully elucidated. The DNAm age of many healthy tissues changes predictably with and follows chronological age, but DNAm age in some reproductive tissues has been shown to depart from chronological age (older: endometrium; younger: cumulus cells, spermatozoa).

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study is a multicenter cohort study based on retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data and material derived from healthy women undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment following ovarian stimulation with antagonist protocol. One hundred and nineteen women were included from September 2016 to June 2018 from four clinics in Denmark and Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 118 healthy women with varying ovarian reserve status. MGCs were collected from 63 of the 119 women by isolation from pooled follicles immediately after oocyte retrieval. DNA from leukocytes and MGCs was extracted and analysed with a genome-wide methylation array. Data from the methylation array were processed using the ENmix package. Subsequently, DNAm age was calculated using established and tailored age predictors and DMRs were analysed with the DMRcate package.

MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE

Using established age predictors, DNAm age in MGCs was found to be considerable younger and constant (average: 2.7 years) compared to chronological age (average: 33.9 years). A Granulosa Cell clock able to predict the age of both MGCs (average: 32.4 years) and leukocytes (average: 38.8 years) was successfully developed. MGCs differed from leukocytes in having a higher number of epimutations (P = 0.003) but predicted telomere lengths unaffected by age (Pearson's correlation coefficient = -0.1, P = 0.47). DMRs associated with age (age-DMRs) were identified in MGCs (n = 335) and in leukocytes (n = 1) with a significant enrichment in MGCs for genes involved in RNA processing (45 genes, P = 3.96 × 10-08) and gene expression (152 genes, P = 2.3 × 10-06). The top age-DMRs included the metastable epiallele VTRNA2-1, the DNAm regulator ZFP57 and the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) gene. The apparent discordance between different epigenetic measures of age in MGCs suggests that they reflect difference stages in the MGC life cycle.

LARGE SCALE DATA

N/A.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: No gene expression data were available to associate with the epigenetic findings. The MGCs are collected during ovarian stimulation, which may influence DNAm; however, no correlation between FSH dose and number of epimutations was found.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings underline that the somatic compartment of the follicle follows a different methylation trajectory with age than other somatic cells. The higher number of epimutations and age-DMRs in MGCs suggest that their function is affected by age.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This project is part of ReproUnion collaborative study, co-financed by the European Union, Interreg V ÖKS, the Danish National Research Foundation and the European Research Council. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

摘要

研究问题

女性年龄是否会对来自壁层颗粒细胞(MGCs)的 DNA 甲基化(DNAm)图谱产生不同的影响?

总结答案

与同一位女性的白细胞相比,MGCs 中发现了年龄相关的表观遗传突变的积累和更多的年龄相关差异甲基化区域(DMR),这表明 MGCs 具有独特的表观遗传特征。

已知事实

女性生育能力从中年 30 多岁开始下降的机制仍有待充分阐明。许多健康组织的 DNAm 年龄随着与年龄相关,并且遵循实际年龄,但一些生殖组织的 DNAm 年龄已被证明与实际年龄不符(较老:子宫内膜;较年轻:卵丘细胞、精子)。

研究设计、大小、持续时间:本研究是一项基于前瞻性收集数据和材料的回顾性分析的多中心队列研究,这些数据和材料来自于丹麦和瑞典四家诊所接受拮抗剂方案卵巢刺激的接受 IVF 或 ICSI 治疗的健康女性。从 2016 年 9 月至 2018 年 6 月,从 4 个诊所共纳入了 119 名女性。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:从 118 名具有不同卵巢储备状态的健康女性中抽取血液样本。从 119 名女性中的 63 名女性中提取 MGCs,方法是在卵母细胞取出后立即从聚集的卵泡中分离。从白细胞和 MGCs 中提取 DNA,并使用全基因组甲基化阵列进行分析。使用 ENmix 软件包处理来自甲基化阵列的数据。随后,使用已建立和定制的年龄预测因子计算 DNAm 年龄,并使用 DMRcate 软件包分析 DMR。

主要结果和机会的作用

使用已建立的年龄预测因子,发现 MGCs 的 DNAm 年龄明显年轻且稳定(平均年龄:2.7 岁),与实际年龄(平均年龄:33.9 岁)相比。成功开发了一种能够预测 MGCs(平均年龄:32.4 岁)和白细胞(平均年龄:38.8 岁)年龄的 Granulosa Cell 时钟。MGCs 与白细胞不同,其表观遗传突变数量更多(P = 0.003),但预测的端粒长度不受年龄影响(Pearson 相关系数 = -0.1,P = 0.47)。在 MGCs 中鉴定出与年龄相关的 DMR(年龄-DMR)(n = 335)和白细胞(n = 1)中鉴定出与年龄相关的 DMR,在 MGCs 中发现了涉及 RNA 处理(45 个基因,P = 3.96×10-08)和基因表达(152 个基因,P = 2.3×10-06)的基因的显著富集。年龄-DMR 包括不稳定的表观等位基因 VTRNA2-1、DNAm 调节剂 ZFP57 和抗苗勒管激素(AMH)基因。MGC 中不同的年龄表观遗传测量值之间的明显不一致表明它们反映了 MGC 生命周期中的不同阶段。

大规模数据

无。

局限性、谨慎的原因:没有可用的基因表达数据与表观遗传发现相关联。MGCs 是在卵巢刺激期间收集的,这可能会影响 DNAm;然而,没有发现 FSH 剂量和表观遗传突变数量之间的相关性。

更广泛的影响

我们的研究结果强调了卵泡的体细胞部分与其他体细胞相比,其 DNAm 随年龄的变化遵循不同的轨迹。MGCs 中表观遗传突变和年龄-DMR 的数量较多表明它们的功能受到年龄的影响。

研究资金/利益冲突:本项目是 ReproUnion 合作研究的一部分,由欧盟、Interreg V ÖKS、丹麦国家研究基金会和欧洲研究理事会共同资助。作者没有利益冲突。

相似文献

1
A distinctive epigenetic ageing profile in human granulosa cells.人类颗粒细胞中独特的表观遗传衰老特征。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun 1;35(6):1332-1345. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa071.
2
Markers of ovarian reserve are associated with reproductive age acceleration in granulosa cells from IVF patients.卵巢储备标志物与 IVF 患者颗粒细胞中的生殖年龄加速有关。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2438-2445. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac178.
3
Identification of a unique epigenetic profile in women with diminished ovarian reserve.鉴定卵巢储备功能降低女性的独特表观遗传特征。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Mar;115(3):732-741. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
4
Epigenetic age acceleration in follicular fluid and markers of ovarian response among women undergoing IVF.体外受精女性的卵泡液中的表观遗传年龄加速与卵巢反应标志物。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Sep 1;39(9):2003-2009. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae136.
5
Biopsying, fragmentation and autotransplantation of fresh ovarian cortical tissue in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve.对卵巢储备功能下降的不孕妇女进行新鲜卵巢皮质组织活检、分割和自体移植。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Oct 2;34(10):1924-1936. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez152.
6
Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies three novel loci for circulating anti-Müllerian hormone levels in women.全基因组关联研究荟萃分析确定了女性循环抗苗勒管激素水平的三个新基因座。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 3;37(5):1069-1082. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac028.
7
DNA methylation differences at birth after conception through ART.ART 受孕后出生时的 DNA 甲基化差异。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jan 1;36(1):248-259. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa253.
8
Expression of neurokinin B/NK3 receptor and kisspeptin/KISS1 receptor in human granulosa cells.神经激肽B/NK3受体和亲吻素/KISS1受体在人颗粒细胞中的表达
Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2736-46. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu247. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
9
Associations between epigenetic age acceleration and infertility.表观遗传年龄加速与不孕的关联。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Aug 25;37(9):2063-2074. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac147.
10
Two waves of transcriptomic changes in periovulatory human granulosa cells.促排卵过程中人类颗粒细胞的两次转录组变化。
Hum Reprod. 2020 May 1;35(5):1230-1245. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa043.

引用本文的文献

1
LINE-1 Methylation sustains telomere length in pregnant women: effects on pregnancy failure.LINE-1甲基化维持孕妇的端粒长度:对妊娠失败的影响。
Clin Epigenetics. 2025 Jul 23;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01937-6.
2
The risk factors, pathogenesis and treatment of premature ovarian insufficiency.卵巢早衰的危险因素、发病机制及治疗
J Ovarian Res. 2025 Jun 18;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13048-025-01714-2.
3
The mystique of epigenetic regulation: the remarkable case of a human noncoding RNA, nc886.表观遗传调控的奥秘:人类非编码RNA nc886的显著案例。
Epigenomics. 2024 Nov-Nov;16(21-22):1389-1405. doi: 10.1080/17501911.2024.2415278. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
4
The oocyte microenvironment is altered in adolescents compared to oocyte donors.与卵母细胞捐赠者相比,青少年的卵母细胞微环境发生了改变。
Hum Reprod Open. 2024 Aug 6;2024(3):hoae047. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae047. eCollection 2024.
5
Epigenetic age acceleration in follicular fluid and markers of ovarian response among women undergoing IVF.体外受精女性的卵泡液中的表观遗传年龄加速与卵巢反应标志物。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Sep 1;39(9):2003-2009. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae136.
6
The oocyte microenvironment is altered in adolescents compared to oocyte donors.与卵母细胞捐赠者相比,青少年的卵母细胞微环境发生了改变。
bioRxiv. 2024 Apr 6:2024.04.04.588118. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.04.588118.
7
Non-coding 886 (/), the epigenetic odd duck - implications for future studies.非编码 886 (/), 表观遗传的奇异鸟-对未来研究的启示。
Epigenetics. 2024 Dec;19(1):2332819. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2024.2332819. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
8
Subtle perturbations of ovarian steroidogenesis in patients classified as Poseidon Group 3. Which consequences for therapeutic strategy?Poseidon 第 3 组患者的卵巢甾体生成功能存在细微紊乱。这对治疗策略有何影响?
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 7;15:1231585. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1231585. eCollection 2024.
9
Understanding the Mechanisms of Diminished Ovarian Reserve: Insights from Genetic Variants and Regulatory Factors.了解卵巢储备功能减退的机制:来自基因变异和调控因子的见解
Reprod Sci. 2024 Jun;31(6):1521-1532. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01467-1. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
10
Epigenetic role of LINE-1 methylation and key genes in pregnancy maintenance.LINE-1 甲基化及其在妊娠维持中的关键基因的表观遗传学作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 8;14(1):3275. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53737-2.