• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉旁路移植术后心房颤动抗凝治疗的比较:一项初步研究。

Comparison of Anticoagulants for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Pharmacy Services, 23506Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.

12281University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Nov;25(6):523-530. doi: 10.1177/1074248420929483. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1177/1074248420929483
PMID:32476465
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants are indicated for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, but their use in patients after undergoing cardiac surgery is poorly defined despite a high prevalence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in this population.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with postoperative atrial fibrillation were prospectively randomized to warfarin or apixaban. Safety, efficacy, and economic outcomes were evaluated until their 4- to 6-week postoperative appointment.

RESULTS

While this pilot study was not powered to determine a difference in safety or efficacy, adverse event rates were similar to the published literature. It was noted that a patient's course of therapy when utilizing apixaban was significantly less costly than warfarin when including medication, bridging, and laboratory expenses.

CONCLUSION

Apixaban and warfarin both appeared to be safe and effective for anticoagulation throughout the duration of this pilot study in treating postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Apixaban was associated with significantly less expense when bridging and monitoring costs were included in addition to medication expense.

摘要

背景

直接作用的口服抗凝剂适用于治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动,但尽管该人群术后心房颤动的发生率很高,但其在心脏手术后患者中的应用仍未得到明确界定。

方法

术后诊断为心房颤动的患者前瞻性随机分为华法林或阿哌沙班组。评估安全性、疗效和经济结果,直到他们术后 4 至 6 周的预约。

结果

虽然这项试点研究没有足够的能力来确定安全性或疗效的差异,但不良事件发生率与已发表的文献相似。值得注意的是,在包括药物、桥接和实验室费用在内的情况下,使用阿哌沙班的患者的治疗过程明显比华法林更经济。

结论

在这项治疗冠状动脉旁路移植术后术后心房颤动的试点研究中,阿哌沙班和华法林在整个研究期间似乎都是安全有效的。当包括桥接和监测成本以及药物成本在内时,阿哌沙班的费用明显更低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Anticoagulants for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Pilot Study.冠状动脉旁路移植术后心房颤动抗凝治疗的比较:一项初步研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Nov;25(6):523-530. doi: 10.1177/1074248420929483. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
Cost-effectiveness of apixaban for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Saudi Arabia.阿哌沙班在沙特阿拉伯非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中预防卒中的成本效益分析
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;39(4):265-278. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.265. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动虚弱患者中阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 13;7(8):e008643. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008643.
4
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.非瓣膜性心房颤动且既往有卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者中应用阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2142-2149. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017474. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of apixaban compared to other direct oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in Austrian atrial fibrillation patients.阿哌沙班与其他直接口服抗凝剂预防奥地利心房颤动患者中风的成本效益分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Apr;21(2):265-275. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1798233. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
6
Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与华法林相比治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725.
7
Novel oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the management of postoperative atrial fibrillation: clinical outcomes and cost analysis.新型口服抗凝药与华法林用于术后房颤管理:临床结局与成本分析
Am J Surg. 2015 Dec;210(6):1095-102; discussion 1102-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
8
Comparing the Cost Effectiveness of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants with Well-Managed Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at High Risk of Bleeding.比较非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂与华法林在高出血风险的心房颤动患者中的卒中预防的成本效果。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018 Aug;18(4):317-325. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0279-y.
9
Early anti-coagulation therapy in new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized trial pilot study.冠状动脉旁路移植术后新发心房颤动的早期抗凝治疗:一项随机试验初步研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04064-x.
10
Efficacy and safety of apixaban in the patients undergoing the ablation of atrial fibrillation.阿哌沙班在接受心房颤动消融术患者中的疗效与安全性。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;38(2):155-63. doi: 10.1111/pace.12553. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the type of oral anticoagulant matter for stroke prevention or bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏手术后房颤患者预防卒中或出血时,口服抗凝剂的类型重要吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Open. 2025 Jun 4;5(3):oeaf062. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf062. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Early anti-coagulation therapy in new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized trial pilot study.冠状动脉旁路移植术后新发心房颤动的早期抗凝治疗:一项随机试验初步研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04064-x.
3
Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use Early After Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
心脏手术后早期直接口服抗凝剂的使用:一项回顾性队列研究
CJC Open. 2023 Sep 9;6(2Part A):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.09.017. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Risk of intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.直接口服抗凝剂颅内出血风险:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2022 Feb;269(2):664-675. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10448-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
5
Comparison of novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for post-operative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.新型口服抗凝药与华法林用于冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤的比较。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Sep 8;58:130-133. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.007. eCollection 2020 Oct.