Harmon-Jones Eddie, Clarke Daniel, Paul Katharina, Harmon-Jones Cindy
School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Experimental, Clinical, and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 May 14;14:157. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00157. eCollection 2020.
The present research was designed to test whether the subjective experience of more effort related to more reward valuation as measured by a neural response. This prediction was derived from the theory of cognitive dissonance and its effort justification paradigm. Young adult participants ( = 82) engaged in multiple trails of a low or high effort task that resulted in a loss or reward on each trial. Neural responses to the reward (loss) cue were measured using EEG so that the event-related potential known as the Reward Positivity (RewP) could be assessed. Results revealed no significant differences between low and high effort conditions on the RewP. However, within the high effort condition, a more subjective experience of effort was associated with a larger RewP. This research extends past research on the effort justification paradigm of cognitive dissonance theory by suggesting that effort justification is associated with an implicit measure of reward valuation. It, therefore, challenges recent perspectives on dissonance processes that posit that these evaluative changes should only occur on explicit but not implicit measures.
本研究旨在测试与更多奖励估值相关的更多努力的主观体验是否可通过神经反应来衡量。这一预测源自认知失调理论及其努力合理化范式。年轻成年参与者(N = 82)参与了低努力或高努力任务的多次试验,每次试验都会导致损失或奖励。使用脑电图测量对奖励(损失)线索的神经反应,以便评估称为奖励正性(RewP)的事件相关电位。结果显示低努力和高努力条件下RewP无显著差异。然而,在高努力条件下,更多的努力主观体验与更大的RewP相关。本研究扩展了过去关于认知失调理论努力合理化范式的研究,表明努力合理化与奖励估值的隐性测量相关。因此,它挑战了最近关于失调过程的观点,即这些评价性变化应该只发生在显性而非隐性测量上。