Ziaei Maryam, Bonyadi Mohammad Reza, Reutens David C
Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 May 5;12:111. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00111. eCollection 2020.
Reasoning requires initial encoding of the semantic association between premises or assumptions, retrieval of these semantic associations from memory, and recombination of information to draw a logical conclusion. Currently-held beliefs can interfere with the content of the assumptions if not congruent and inhibited. This study aimed to investigate the role of the hippocampus and hippocampal networks during logical reasoning tasks in which the congruence between currently-held beliefs and assumptions varies. Participants of younger and older age completed a series of syllogistic reasoning tasks in which two premises and one conclusion were presented and they were required to decide if the conclusion logically followed the premises. The belief load of premises was manipulated to be either congruent or incongruent with currently-held beliefs. Our whole-brain results showed that older adults recruited the hippocampus during the premise integration stage more than their younger counterparts. Functional connectivity using a hippocampal seed revealed that older, but not younger, adults recruited a hippocampal network that included anterior cingulate and inferior frontal regions when premises were believable. Importantly, this network contributed to better performance in believable inferences, only in older adults group. Further analyses suggested that, in older adults group, the integrity of the left cingulum bundle was associated with the higher rejection of believable premises more than unbelievable ones. Using multimodal imaging, this study highlights the importance of the hippocampus during premise integration and supports compensatory role of the hippocampal network during a logical reasoning task among older adults.
推理需要对前提或假设之间的语义关联进行初始编码,从记忆中检索这些语义关联,并对信息进行重新组合以得出逻辑结论。如果当前持有的信念不一致且未受抑制,那么它们可能会干扰假设的内容。本研究旨在调查海马体及海马体网络在当前持有的信念与假设的一致性存在变化的逻辑推理任务中的作用。年轻和年长的参与者完成了一系列三段论推理任务,在这些任务中会呈现两个前提和一个结论,要求他们判断结论在逻辑上是否遵循前提。前提的信念负荷被操纵为与当前持有的信念一致或不一致。我们的全脑结果显示,与年轻参与者相比,年长成年人在前提整合阶段更多地激活了海马体。使用海马体种子点的功能连接分析表明,当年前提可信时,年长成年人(而非年轻成年人)激活了一个包括前扣带回和额下回区域的海马体网络。重要的是,仅在年长成年人组中,这个网络有助于在可信推理中表现得更好。进一步分析表明,在年长成年人组中,左侧扣带束的完整性与对可信前提(而非不可信前提)的更高拒绝率相关。通过多模态成像,本研究强调了海马体在前提整合过程中的重要性,并支持了海马体网络在年长成年人逻辑推理任务中的补偿作用。