• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术后相对于普通人群的生存率和生活质量。

Survival and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation relative to the general population.

作者信息

Zelis Jo M, van 't Veer Marcel, Houterman Saskia, Pijls Nico H J, Tonino Pim A L

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Netherlands Heart Registration, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 May 22;28:100536. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100536. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100536
PMID:32478166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7251765/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about survival and quality of life (QoL) of patients treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared to the age- and sex-matched general population. In this study we compared subgroups of the National Heart Registration TAVI cohort to the Dutch age- and sex-matched population at the level of survival and QoL.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR) the TAVI cohort (5489 patients, period 2013-2017) was extracted. These data were compared to the national Dutch population data collected from the national statistics office, Statistics Netherlands (CBS). Subgroups were defined according to sex and age (<65, 65-80 and >80). For QoL analyses the age subgroups <65, 65-75 and >75 were used. Long term survival was significantly higher in the general population compared to the TAVI population. Elderly TAVI patients (>80 years) had the same survival as the age-matched general population (46vs43% at 5 years, respectively). Survival in women was better than in men in both the general population and the TAVI cohort. Patients treated by TAVI, aged 65 years and older had a comparable QoL to that of the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that TAVI patients aged 80 years and older have a similar long-term survival as an age-matched general population. However, because of lower survival in under 80 TAVI patients, the overall long term survival of all TAVI patients is worse than that of the general population in the Netherlands. This study also suggests that QoL after TAVI treatment is comparable to QoL in the general population.

摘要

背景

与年龄和性别匹配的普通人群相比,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗患者的生存率和生活质量(QoL)鲜为人知。在本研究中,我们在生存和生活质量水平上,将国家心脏注册TAVI队列的亚组与荷兰年龄和性别匹配的人群进行了比较。

方法与结果

从荷兰心脏注册(NHR)中提取了TAVI队列(5489例患者,2013 - 2017年)。这些数据与从荷兰国家统计局(CBS)收集的荷兰全国人口数据进行了比较。亚组根据性别和年龄(<65岁、65 - 80岁和>80岁)定义。对于生活质量分析,使用了<65岁、65 - 75岁和>75岁的年龄亚组。普通人群的长期生存率显著高于TAVI人群。老年TAVI患者(>80岁)的生存率与年龄匹配的普通人群相同(5年时分别为46%对43%)。在普通人群和TAVI队列中,女性的生存率均高于男性。65岁及以上接受TAVI治疗的患者的生活质量与普通人群相当。

结论

本研究表明,80岁及以上的TAVI患者与年龄匹配的普通人群具有相似的长期生存率。然而,由于80岁以下TAVI患者的生存率较低,所有TAVI患者的总体长期生存率低于荷兰普通人群。本研究还表明,TAVI治疗后的生活质量与普通人群相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/e5d2e7ff7757/fx5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/d6ed788ddbd1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/98ed855021cd/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/b3e547368585/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/b953efe661c8/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/8024795e0c0b/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/e29eb610f9a6/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/6464934d2e35/fx4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/e5d2e7ff7757/fx5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/d6ed788ddbd1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/98ed855021cd/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/b3e547368585/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/b953efe661c8/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/8024795e0c0b/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/e29eb610f9a6/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/6464934d2e35/fx4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0e/7251765/e5d2e7ff7757/fx5.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation relative to the general population.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后相对于普通人群的生存率和生活质量。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 May 22;28:100536. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100536. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Relative Survival After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: How Do Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Fare Relative to the General Population?经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的相对生存率:行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者与普通人群相比预后如何?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 17;6(10):e007229. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007229.
3
Update and, internal and temporal-validation of the FRANCE-2 and ACC-TAVI early-mortality prediction models for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using data from the Netherlands heart registration (NHR).利用荷兰心脏注册(NHR)的数据,对用于经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的FRANCE - 2和ACC - TAVI早期死亡率预测模型进行更新、内部及时间验证。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jan 23;32:100716. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100716. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗低手术风险的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Nov 2;20(14):1-148. eCollection 2020.
5
Is the quality-of-life improvement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation equivalent to that achieved by surgical aortic valve replacement?经导管主动脉瓣植入术后生活质量的改善是否等同于外科主动脉瓣置换术所达到的改善?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Nov 22;33(6):866-870. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab186.
6
Quality of life in high-risk patients: comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with surgical aortic valve replacement.高危患者的生活质量:经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;43(1):34-41; discussion 41-2. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs173. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
7
Recent trends in aortic valve interventions: Data of the Netherlands heart registration.主动脉瓣介入治疗的近期趋势:荷兰心脏注册数据。
J Card Surg. 2021 Feb;36(2):573-581. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15265. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in Taiwan: A population-based cohort study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗台湾主动脉瓣狭窄:基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 May 3;18(5):e0285191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285191. eCollection 2023.
9
The impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on quality of life: results from the German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry.经导管主动脉瓣植入术对生活质量的影响:来自德国经导管主动脉瓣干预注册研究的结果
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Oct;104(10):877-86. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0857-9. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
10
Comparing functional and quality of life outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的功能和生活质量结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03445-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting one-year outcomes after TAVI: evidence from a two-site Swiss registry.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后一年预后的预测:来自瑞士两个中心登记处的证据
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05114-8.
2
Early cognitive and quality of life changes after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期认知及生活质量变化
Med Pharm Rep. 2025 Jul;98(3):311-319. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2885. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
3
Mortality and morbidity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to an age- and sex-matched control population: a population-based study from the SWEDEHEART registry.

本文引用的文献

1
Loss in Life Expectancy After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: SWEDEHEART Study.主动脉瓣置换术后预期寿命的损失:SWEDEHEART 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 9;74(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.053.
2
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
3
Outcomes of Patients With Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Followed Up in Heart Valve Clinics.
与年龄和性别匹配的对照人群相比,经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的死亡率和发病率:一项基于瑞典心脏注册研究的人群研究。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025 Aug 11;11(5):614-621. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf008.
4
The Impact of Frailty and Surgical Risk on Health-Related Quality of Life After TAVI.衰弱和手术风险对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Oct 18;11(10):333. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11100333.
5
Myocardial work and risk stratification in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的心肌工作与风险分层
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Jul 24;53:101474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101474. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂:一项荟萃分析。
JACC Adv. 2024 Apr 6;3(5):100927. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100927. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Unsupervised cluster analysis reveals different phenotypes in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.无监督聚类分析揭示了经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者的不同表型。
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Dec 20;4(1):oead136. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead136. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
All-cause procedural readmissions following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的全因手术再入院情况。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jul 24;15:83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.017. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Quality of Life Measures in Aortic Stenosis Research: A Narrative Review.主动脉瓣狭窄研究中的生活质量测量:叙事性综述。
Cardiology. 2023;148(6):556-570. doi: 10.1159/000531465. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
10
Soluble ST2 as a Potential Biomarker for Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients Undergoing TAVR?可溶性ST2作为经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者肺动脉高压风险评估的潜在生物标志物?
Life (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;12(3):389. doi: 10.3390/life12030389.
心脏瓣膜门诊随访的无症状主动脉瓣狭窄患者的结局。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;3(11):1060-1068. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3152.
4
Corrigendum to 'Comparison of Outcomes of Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients <90 to Those >90 Years of Age' [American Journal of Cardiology (2018) 1581-1586].《<90岁与>90岁患者经股动脉主动脉瓣植入术结果比较》勘误 [《美国心脏病学杂志》(2018年)1581 - 1586页]
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 15;122(12):2173-2175. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
5
Trends in patient characteristics and clinical outcome over 8 years of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术8年期间患者特征及临床结局的趋势
Neth Heart J. 2018 Sep;26(9):445-453. doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1129-x.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current status and future perspectives.经导管主动脉瓣植入术:现状与未来展望。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jul 21;39(28):2625-2634. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy244.
7
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;52(4):616-664. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx324.
8
Relative Survival After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: How Do Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Fare Relative to the General Population?经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的相对生存率:行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者与普通人群相比预后如何?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 17;6(10):e007229. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007229.
9
2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会对2014年《美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南》的重点更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 11;70(2):252-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
10
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科瓣膜置换术治疗中危患者的效果比较:倾向评分分析。
Lancet. 2016 May 28;387(10034):2218-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30073-3. Epub 2016 Apr 3.