Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jan;44(1):139-147. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1760948. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
To evaluate the reliability and discriminative validity of a proposed adapted tool for the assessment of movement control in patients with and without neck pain.
A cross-sectional study at a University hospital center involving 25 pain-free healthy controls and 25 patients suffering from neck pain. Participants were assessed by two raters for inter-rater reliability and 1 week afterwards by a same rater for intra-rater reliability. The assessment involved a test for the axioscapular (adapted scapular holding test; SHT) and craniocervical (adapted craniocervical flexion test; CCFT) region for which intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed to define the reliability. Discriminative validity to distinguish patients from controls was assessed by cross-validated computation of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, overall accuracy, and area under the curve.
The proposed tool was able to reliably assess sensorimotor impairment in participants at the craniocervical region (ICC = [0.52-0.82]; ICC = [0.60-0.85]), left axioscapular region (ICC = [0.43-0.77]; ICC = 0.71-0.90), and right axioscapular region (ICC = [0.47-0.79]; ICC = [0.42-0.77]). Furthermore, the tool yielded a sensitivity of 0.86, a specificity of 0.57, and accuracy of 0.71 (based on cross-validation).
The proposed tool is able to reliably evaluate patients based on their sensorimotor performance in the craniocervical and axioscapular region.Implications for rehabilitationNeck pain is related to sensorimotor impairment including neuromuscular differences and atypical sensormimotor control strategies.Clinicians should not avoid the challenging task of screening for sensorimotor impairment in patients reporting neck pain.The proposed tool supplemented with other tools might guide clinicians in the evaluation of sensorimotor impairment.
评估一种针对有无颈痛患者的运动控制评估的改良工具的可靠性和区分效度。
在一家大学医院中心进行的横断面研究,涉及 25 名无疼痛的健康对照者和 25 名患有颈痛的患者。两名评估者对参与者进行评估,以评估组内可靠性,一周后由同一名评估者进行评估,以评估组内可靠性。评估包括对肩带(改良肩胛保持试验;SHT)和颅颈(改良颅颈前屈试验;CCFT)区域的测试,计算了组内相关系数(ICC)以确定可靠性。通过交叉验证计算敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比、总准确性和曲线下面积来评估区分颈痛患者和对照组的区分效度。
所提出的工具能够可靠地评估参与者在颅颈区域(ICC = [0.52-0.82];ICC = [0.60-0.85])、左侧肩带区域(ICC = [0.43-0.77];ICC = 0.71-0.90)和右侧肩带区域(ICC = [0.47-0.79];ICC = [0.42-0.77])的感觉运动障碍。此外,该工具的敏感性为 0.86,特异性为 0.57,准确性为 0.71(基于交叉验证)。
所提出的工具能够可靠地评估患者在颅颈和肩带区域的感觉运动表现。
颈痛与感觉运动障碍有关,包括神经肌肉差异和非典型感觉运动控制策略。临床医生不应回避对报告颈痛的患者进行感觉运动障碍筛查的挑战性任务。在其他工具的补充下,所提出的工具可能有助于临床医生评估感觉运动障碍。