• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 PSR 模型和基于熵的物元理论的苏南运河洪水排水权初始分配。

Initial allocation of flood drainage rights based on a PSR model and entropy-based matter-element theory in the Sunan Canal, China.

机构信息

College of Agricultural Science Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 1;15(6):e0233570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233570. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0233570
PMID:32479523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7263625/
Abstract

The pursuit of flood prevention safety and the mitigation of drainage contradiction against an unnecessary influx of floodwater require a modern and efficient model to optimize the management of the initial allocation of flood drainage rights. We attempted to formulate a framework for initial flood drainage rights allocation to promote the sustainable drainage of the Sunan Canal, China. The Pressure-State-Response (PSR) model was constructed using a literature review and interviews with experts and directors using 18 key indicators being determined from field surveys and library studies. We then assessed the flood status of Zhenjiang City, Changzhou City, Wuxi City and Suzhou City in the Sunan Canal zone using an entropy-based matter-element model. The flood drainage rights for a total of 400m3/s was allocated to the four cities in accordance with their flood status. Our research demonstrated that, overall, the four cities may gain the flood drainage rights of 106.67m3/s,120.40m3/s, 118.22m3/s and 54.71m3/s, respectively. Specifically, the calculation of the flood drainage for Wuxi was very close to the actual allocation in 2016, whereas there were differences in the other cities that should not be neglected.

摘要

追求防洪安全和缓解排水矛盾,防止不必要的洪水涌入,需要一个现代高效的模型来优化洪水排水权初始分配的管理。我们试图制定一个初始洪水排水权分配框架,以促进中国苏南运河的可持续排水。利用文献综述和对专家和主任的访谈,使用从实地调查和图书馆研究中确定的 18 个关键指标,构建了压力-状态-响应(PSR)模型。然后,我们使用基于熵的物元模型评估了苏南运河地区的镇江、常州、无锡和苏州四个城市的洪水状况。根据洪水状况,为这四个城市分配了总计 400m3/s 的洪水排水权。我们的研究表明,总的来说,四个城市可能分别获得 106.67m3/s、120.40m3/s、118.22m3/s 和 54.71m3/s 的洪水排水权。具体来说,无锡的洪水排水计算非常接近 2016 年的实际分配情况,而其他城市的计算结果存在差异,不容忽视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c75/7263625/35f9b5811a1f/pone.0233570.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c75/7263625/b4649be2456e/pone.0233570.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c75/7263625/33065fe6731e/pone.0233570.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c75/7263625/09795548e7e5/pone.0233570.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c75/7263625/35f9b5811a1f/pone.0233570.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c75/7263625/b4649be2456e/pone.0233570.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c75/7263625/33065fe6731e/pone.0233570.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c75/7263625/09795548e7e5/pone.0233570.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c75/7263625/35f9b5811a1f/pone.0233570.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Initial allocation of flood drainage rights based on a PSR model and entropy-based matter-element theory in the Sunan Canal, China.基于 PSR 模型和基于熵的物元理论的苏南运河洪水排水权初始分配。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 1;15(6):e0233570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233570. eCollection 2020.
2
Allocation of Flood Drainage Rights in Watershed Using a Hybrid FBWM-Grey-TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of the Jiangsu Section of the Sunan Canal, China.基于混合 FBWM-Grey-TOPSIS 方法的流域洪排水权分配:以中国苏南运河江苏段为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 4;19(13):8180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138180.
3
Study of the Allocation of Regional Flood Drainage Rights in Watershed Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS Model: A Case Study of the Jiangsu Section of the Huaihe River, China.基于熵权 TOPSIS 模型的流域区域洪水排水权分配研究——以中国淮河流域江苏段为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 13;17(14):5020. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145020.
4
Allocation of Flood Drainage Rights Based on the PSR Model and Pythagoras Fuzzy TOPSIS Method.基于 PSR 模型和毕达哥拉斯模糊 TOPSIS 方法的洪排水权分配
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 11;17(16):5821. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165821.
5
Use of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Environmental Gini Coefficient for Allocation of Regional Flood Drainage Rights.运用模糊层次分析法和环境基尼系数分配区域洪水排水权。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 20;17(6):2063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062063.
6
Sustainable flood control strategies under extreme rainfall: Allocation of flood drainage rights in the middle and lower reaches of the yellow river based on a new decision-making framework.基于新决策框架的黄河中下游洪水资源化分配:极端降雨下的可持续防洪策略。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:122020. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122020. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
Application of the stormwater management model to a piedmont city: a case study of Jinan City, China.雨水管理模型在山麓城市的应用:以中国济南市为例。
Water Sci Technol. 2014;70(5):858-64. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.302.
8
Adaptation to urbanization impacts on drainage in the city of Hohhot, China.适应城市化对中国呼和浩特市排水的影响。
Water Sci Technol. 2016;73(1):167-75. doi: 10.2166/wst.2015.478.
9
Urban flood mitigation planning for Guwahati: A case of Bharalu basin.古瓦哈蒂城市洪涝缓解规划:以巴拉鲁流域为例。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 15;206:1155-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.079. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
10
Assessment of the service performance of drainage system and transformation of pipeline network based on urban combined sewer system model.基于城市合流制排水系统模型的排水系统服务性能评估与管网改造
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Oct;22(20):15712-21. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4707-0. Epub 2015 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing precision flood mapping: Pahang's vulnerability unveiled.提升精准洪水图绘制:彭亨州的脆弱性显现。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 7;19(11):e0310435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310435. eCollection 2024.
2
Urban flood risk differentiation under land use scenario simulation.土地利用情景模拟下的城市洪水风险分化
iScience. 2023 Mar 23;26(4):106479. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106479. eCollection 2023 Apr 21.
3
Allocation of Flood Drainage Rights in Watershed Using a Hybrid FBWM-Grey-TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of the Jiangsu Section of the Sunan Canal, China.

本文引用的文献

1
Opinion: Flood-risk reduction: Structural measures and diverse strategies.观点:降低洪水风险:结构性措施与多样化策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 4;115(49):12321-12325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818227115.
2
The Humber catchment and its coastal area: from UK to European perspectives.亨伯集水区及其沿海地区:从英国到欧洲的视角
Sci Total Environ. 2003 Oct 1;314-316:31-52. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(03)00093-7.
基于混合 FBWM-Grey-TOPSIS 方法的流域洪排水权分配:以中国苏南运河江苏段为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 4;19(13):8180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138180.
4
The effects of community safety support on COVID-19 event strength perception, risk perception, and health tourism intention: The moderating role of risk communication.社区安全支持对新冠疫情事件强度感知、风险感知及健康旅游意愿的影响:风险沟通的调节作用
MDE Manage Decis Econ. 2022 Mar;43(2):496-509. doi: 10.1002/mde.3397. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
5
Allocation of Flood Drainage Rights Based on the PSR Model and Pythagoras Fuzzy TOPSIS Method.基于 PSR 模型和毕达哥拉斯模糊 TOPSIS 方法的洪排水权分配
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 11;17(16):5821. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165821.