Geng Jie, Yang Ke-Lu, Cai Yi-Tong, Shi Ji-Yuan, Yin Min, Wang Xiao-Ping
Evidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University.
The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 22;99(21):e20417. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020417.
Pressure ulcers (PU) bring a considerable physical and mental burden on patients and their families, and have put families and government under tremendous pressure to cover the cost for treatment. Therefore, this protocol proposes to evaluate the quality of existing PU clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and compare the similarities and differences between its recommendations in order to improve the treatment efficacy and reduce the PU treatment cost.
Electronic databases and specific databases of CPGs will be searched. Study selection and data collection will be performed independently by two reviewers. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument and Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) will be used to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of included CPGs. Bubble plot will be used to describe the difference of the quality, and mind mapping will be plotted to illustrate the comparison of recommendations of a guideline when needed. R software, MindMaster and Excel will be used.
The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.
This systematic review will provide comprehensive evidence of CPGs of PU.
CRD42020149176.
压疮给患者及其家庭带来了相当大的身心负担,也使家庭和政府在支付治疗费用方面承受巨大压力。因此,本方案建议评估现有压疮临床实践指南(CPG)的质量,并比较其建议之间的异同,以提高治疗效果并降低压疮治疗成本。
将检索电子数据库和CPG的特定数据库。由两名评审员独立进行研究选择和数据收集。将使用《研究与评价指南II》(AGREE II)工具和《医疗保健实践指南报告条目》(RIGHT)来评估纳入的CPG的方法学质量和报告质量。将使用气泡图描述质量差异,并在需要时绘制思维导图来说明指南建议的比较。将使用R软件、MindMaster和Excel。
本研究结果将提交给同行评审期刊发表。
本系统评价将提供压疮CPG的全面证据。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020149176。