• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

STAPLAg:一种适用于重症监护病房感染患者的便捷早期预警评分

STAPLAg: a convenient early warning score for use in infected patients in the intensive care unit.

作者信息

Zhang Keji, Lv Dan, Deng Yuxiao, Zhu Changqing, Gao Yuan, Huang Yuan, Xu Xinhui

机构信息

Department of Emergency.

Department of Surgery Intensive Care Unit, Ren Ji Hospital.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 29;99(22):e20274. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020274.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000020274
PMID:32481394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12245252/
Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening disease in the intensive care unit (ICU). The current diagnostic criteria for sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores do not reflect the current understanding of sepsis. We developed a novel and convenient score to aid early prognosis.Retrospective multivariable regression analysis of 185 infected emergency ICU (EICU) patients was conducted to identify independent variables associated with death, to develop the new "STAPLAg" score; STAPLAg was then validated in an internal cohort (n = 106) and an external cohort (n = 78) and its predictive efficacy was compared with that of the initial SOFA score.Age, and initial serum albumin, sodium, PLR, troponin, and lactate tests in the emergency department were independent predictors of death in infected EICU patients, and were used to establish the STAPLAg score (area under the curve [AUC] 0.865). The initial SOFA score on admission was predictive of death (AUC 0.782). Applying the above categories to the derivation cohort yielded mortality risks of 7.7% for grade I, 56.3% for grade II, and 75.0% for grade III. Internal (AUC 0.884) and external (AUC 0.918) cohort validation indicated that the score had good predictive power.The STAPLAg score can be determined early in infected EICU patients, and exhibited better prognostic capacity than the initial SOFA score on admission in both internal and external cohorts. STAPLAg constitutes a new resource for use in the clinical diagnosis of sepsis and can also predict mortality in infected EICU patients. REGISTRATION NUMBER:: ChinCTR-PNC-16010288.

摘要

脓毒症是重症监护病房(ICU)中一种危及生命的疾病。目前序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的诊断标准并不能反映当前对脓毒症的认识。我们开发了一种新颖且便捷的评分系统以辅助早期预后评估。

对185例感染性急诊ICU(EICU)患者进行回顾性多变量回归分析,以确定与死亡相关的独立变量,从而开发新的“STAPLAg”评分;然后在内部队列(n = 106)和外部队列(n = 78)中对STAPLAg进行验证,并将其预测效能与初始SOFA评分的预测效能进行比较。

年龄、急诊科初始血清白蛋白、钠、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、肌钙蛋白和乳酸检测是感染性EICU患者死亡的独立预测因素,并用于建立STAPLAg评分(曲线下面积[AUC]为0.865)。入院时的初始SOFA评分可预测死亡(AUC为0.782)。将上述类别应用于推导队列,I级的死亡风险为7.7%,II级为56.3%,III级为75.0%。内部队列(AUC为0.884)和外部队列(AUC为0.918)验证表明该评分具有良好的预测能力。

STAPLAg评分可在感染性EICU患者早期确定,并且在内部和外部队列中均显示出比入院时的初始SOFA评分更好的预后能力。STAPLAg构成了脓毒症临床诊断的一种新资源,也可预测感染性EICU患者的死亡率。注册号:ChinCTR-PNC-16010288

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba14/12245252/b56117134e4a/medi-99-e20274-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba14/12245252/b56117134e4a/medi-99-e20274-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba14/12245252/b56117134e4a/medi-99-e20274-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
STAPLAg: a convenient early warning score for use in infected patients in the intensive care unit.STAPLAg:一种适用于重症监护病房感染患者的便捷早期预警评分
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 29;99(22):e20274. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020274.
2
Lactate-albumin ratio improves combined predictive value of qSOFA and MEWS for 30-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis: A retrospective cohort study.乳酸-白蛋白比值提高qSOFA和MEWS对脓毒症重症监护病房患者30天死亡率的联合预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 4;104(27):e43097. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043097.
3
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
4
Assessment of S100A8/A9 and resistin as predictive biomarkers for mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis.评估S100A8/A9和抵抗素作为脓毒症重症患者死亡率的预测生物标志物。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jun 3;15:1555307. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1555307. eCollection 2025.
5
Predictive value of mNUTRIC score for chronic critical illness in patients of sepsis complicated with ARDS.mNUTRIC评分对脓毒症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者慢性危重病的预测价值
Technol Health Care. 2025 Mar;33(2):831-837. doi: 10.1177/09287329241296430. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Performance of the quick Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment score as a prognostic tool in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分在重症监护室外感染患者中的预后工具性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Feb 6;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1952-x.
8
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
9
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of CD86 for the occurrence of sepsis (Sepsis-3) in patients with infection.CD86 对感染患者发生脓毒症(Sepsis-3)的预测价值。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 11;19(4):e0302063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302063. eCollection 2024.
2
Hierarchical Capability in Distinguishing Severities of Sepsis via Serum Lactate: A Network Meta-Analysis.通过血清乳酸区分脓毒症严重程度的分层能力:一项网状Meta分析
Biomedicines. 2024 Feb 17;12(2):447. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12020447.
3
Deep learning-based prediction of in-hospital mortality for sepsis.

本文引用的文献

1
Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Is Not Good for Ruling Sepsis In or Out.快速序贯器官衰竭评估不适用于排除或诊断脓毒症。
Chest. 2019 Aug;156(2):197-199. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.003.
2
Serum albumin as a risk factor for death in patients with prolonged sepsis: An observational study.血清白蛋白作为延长脓毒症患者死亡的风险因素:一项观察性研究。
J Crit Care. 2019 Jun;51:139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
3
An investigation of the effects of the mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and platelet counts on mortality in patents with sepsis who applied to the emergency department.
基于深度学习的脓毒症住院患者死亡率预测。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):372. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49890-9.
4
Risk Factors for Frequent Infections in Patients With Extremely Severe Motor and Intellectual Disabilities.极重度运动和智力残疾患者频繁感染的危险因素
Cureus. 2023 Mar 15;15(3):e36174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36174. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Predicting 30-days mortality for MIMIC-III patients with sepsis-3: a machine learning approach using XGboost.利用 XGBoost 对 MIMIC-III 脓毒症-3 患者进行 30 天死亡率预测:机器学习方法。
J Transl Med. 2020 Dec 7;18(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02620-5.
对因脓毒症就诊于急诊科的患者,平均血小板体积、血小板分布宽度、血小板/淋巴细胞比值及血小板计数对死亡率影响的调查。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 May;21(5):667-671. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_44_17.
4
Myocardial Injury in Patients With Sepsis and Its Association With Long-Term Outcome.脓毒症患者的心肌损伤及其与长期预后的关联
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Feb;11(2):e004040. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004040.
5
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症与脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016版
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255.
6
Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a novel marker of in-hospital and long-term adverse outcomes among patients with acute pulmonary embolism: A single center large-scale study.血小板与淋巴细胞比值可作为急性肺栓塞患者住院期和远期不良结局的新型标志物:一项单中心大样本研究。
Thromb Res. 2017 Feb;150:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
7
The value of blood lactate kinetics in critically ill patients: a systematic review.危重症患者血乳酸动力学的价值:一项系统评价。
Crit Care. 2016 Aug 13;20(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1403-5.
8
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
9
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
10
Hyponatremia and 30 days mortality of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.急性肺栓塞患者的低钠血症与30天死亡率
J Res Med Sci. 2015 Aug;20(8):777-81. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.168402.