University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Pain. 2020 Oct;161(10):2284-2298. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001943.
Chronic pain is a significant health problem worldwide with limited pharmacological treatment options. This study evaluated the relative efficacy of 4 treatment sessions each of 4 nonpharmacological treatments: (1) hypnotic cognitive therapy (using hypnosis to alter the meaning of pain); (2) standard cognitive therapy; (3) hypnosis focused on pain reduction, and (4) pain education. One hundred seventy-three individuals with chronic pain were randomly assigned to receive 4 sessions of 1 of the 4 treatments. Primary (pain intensity) and secondary outcome measures were administered by assessors unaware of treatment allocation at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Treatment effects were evaluated using analysis of variance, a generalized estimating equation approach, or a Fisher exact test, depending on the outcome domain examined. All 4 treatments were associated with medium to large effect size improvements in pain intensity that maintained up to 12 months posttreatment. Pretreatment to posttreatment improvements were observed across the 4 treatment conditions on the secondary outcomes of pain interference and depressive symptoms, with some return towards pretreatment levels at 12-month follow-up. No significant between-group differences emerged in omnibus analyses, and few statistically significant between-group differences emerged in the planned pairwise analyses, although the 2 significant effects that did emerge favored hypnotic cognitive therapy. Future research is needed to determine whether the significant differences that emerged are reliable.
慢性疼痛是一个全球性的重大健康问题,其治疗选择有限。本研究评估了 4 种非药物治疗方法(1. 催眠认知疗法(使用催眠术改变疼痛的意义);2. 标准认知疗法;3. 专注于减轻疼痛的催眠;4. 疼痛教育)的 4 个疗程各 4 次的相对疗效。173 名慢性疼痛患者被随机分配接受 4 种治疗方法中的 1 种的 4 个疗程。主要(疼痛强度)和次要结局指标由在治疗前、治疗后以及 3、6 和 12 个月随访时不知道治疗分配的评估者进行管理。使用方差分析、广义估计方程方法或 Fisher 精确检验评估治疗效果,具体取决于检查的结果域。所有 4 种治疗方法均与疼痛强度的中到大的效应量改善相关,这些改善可维持至治疗后 12 个月。在次要结局(疼痛干扰和抑郁症状)方面,在 4 种治疗条件下,从治疗前到治疗后都观察到了改善,在 12 个月随访时,有些指标恢复到治疗前水平。在综合分析中未出现显著的组间差异,在计划的两两分析中也很少出现统计学意义上的组间差异,尽管确实出现了 2 个有意义的有利催眠认知疗法的效应。需要进一步研究以确定出现的显著差异是否可靠。