Märtsin Mariann
School of Governance, Law and Society, Tallinn University, Narva mnt 29, Tallinn, 10120, Estonia.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):694-700. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09552-1.
Zagaria, Andó and Zennaro (2020) provide a useful analysis of the current state of affairs in the discipline of psychology. They conclude that psychology is in a messy and unproductive pre-pragmatic state and suggest that evolutionary psychology can provide a needed metatheoretical perspective to enable psychology to move forward as a science. In my commentary I move to another direction and suggest that psychology does not need more solid foundations, but rather foundations characterized by reflective stance towards its phenomena, theories, methods and data production processes. I suggest that this kind of stance would be in accordance with the process ontological perspective that allows focusing on meaningful human experience as central object of study for psychology, together with an idiographic approach to research. I thus suggest that psychology will endure only by turning its reflective gaze towards oneself, by thinking about its past, imagining its future and constructing novelty from the creative assemblage of the two.
扎加里亚、安多和泽纳罗(2020年)对心理学学科的当前状况进行了有益的分析。他们得出结论,心理学处于一种混乱且无成效的前实用主义状态,并认为进化心理学可以提供一种必要的元理论视角,以使心理学作为一门科学向前发展。在我的评论中,我转向另一个方向,认为心理学并不需要更坚实的基础,而是需要以对其现象、理论、方法和数据生产过程采取反思性立场为特征的基础。我认为这种立场将与过程本体论视角相一致,该视角允许将有意义的人类体验作为心理学研究的核心对象,并采用个案研究法进行研究。因此,我认为心理学只有通过将反思的目光转向自身,思考其过去,想象其未来,并从两者的创造性组合中构建新事物,才能持续发展。