• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating Oregon's occupational public health surveillance system based on the CDC updated guidelines.基于疾病预防控制中心更新的指导方针评估俄勒冈州的职业公共卫生监测系统。
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Aug;63(8):713-725. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23139. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
Understanding occupational safety and health surveillance: expert consensus on components, attributes and example measures for an evaluation framework.理解职业安全与健康监测:关于评估框架的组成部分、属性及示例措施的专家共识
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;22(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12895-6.
3
Workplace health promotion and safety in state and territorial health departments in the United States: a national mixed-methods study of activity, capacity, and growth opportunities.美国州和地区卫生部门的工作场所健康促进与安全:一项关于活动、能力和增长机会的全国性混合方法研究
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6575-x.
4
Public health surveillance in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: evaluation of the Praedico surveillance system.美国退伍军人事务部公共卫生监测:Praedico 监测系统评估。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;22(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12578-2.
5
Evaluation of the collaborative integrated surveillance system (ViCo) in Guatemala: a qualitative study on lessons learned and future perspectives.危地马拉协作综合监测系统(ViCo)评估:关于经验教训与未来展望的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12719-7.
6
Evaluation of malaria surveillance system in Kano State, Nigeria, 2013-2016.2013-2016 年尼日利亚卡诺州疟疾监测系统评估。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Feb 10;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-0629-2.
7
Evaluation of Two Malaria Surveillance Systems in Yemen Using Updated CDC Guidelines: Lessons Learned and Future Perspectives.使用最新的美国疾病控制与预防中心指南对也门的两种疟疾监测系统进行评估:经验教训与未来展望。
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019880736. doi: 10.1177/0046958019880736.
8
Improving integration and coordination of funding, technical assistance, and reporting/data collection: recommendations from CDC and USAPI stakeholders.改善资金、技术援助以及报告/数据收集的整合与协调:美国疾病控制与预防中心及美国国际开发署参与方的建议
Pac Health Dialog. 2011 Mar;17(1):185-97.
9
Tuberculosis surveillance system evaluation: case of Ga West municipality, Ghana, 2011 to 2016.结核病监测系统评估:以加纳西部市为例,2011 年至 2016 年。
Ghana Med J. 2020 Jun;54(2 Suppl):3-10. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v54i2s.2.
10
CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013.美国疾病控制与预防中心国家健康报告:2005 - 2013年美国发病和死亡的主要原因以及相关行为风险和保护因素
MMWR Suppl. 2014 Oct 31;63(4):3-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Global variation in antibiotic prescribing guidelines and the implications for decreasing AMR in the future.抗生素处方指南的全球差异及其对未来降低抗菌药物耐药性的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 7;16:1600787. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1600787. eCollection 2025.
2
Proposed approaches for public health surveillance: A literature review for the Canadian National HIV Surveillance Program.公共卫生监测的拟议方法:加拿大国家艾滋病毒监测项目的文献综述
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2025 May 1;51(5):191-211. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v51i05a06. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Developing an evaluation framework for public health environmental surveillance: Protocol for an international, multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study.制定公共卫生环境监测评估框架:一项国际多学科德尔菲共识研究方案
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0310342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310342. eCollection 2025.
4
Exploring the economic occupational health, safety, and fatal accidents in high-risk industries.探索高危行业中的经济职业健康、安全及致命事故。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21583-0.
5
[Evaluation of the Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Surveillance System in the Assaba region, Mauritania (2020-2022)].[毛里塔尼亚阿萨巴地区病毒性出血热监测系统评估(2020 - 2022年)]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2024 May 2;4(2). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v4i2.2024.513. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
6
Assessing health human resource structure at Urumqi's center for disease control and prevention.评估乌鲁木齐疾病预防控制中心的卫生人力资源结构。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 1;102(48):e36209. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036209.
7
An in-depth review of the UNICEF NutriDash platform, lessons learnt and future perspectives: a mixed-methods study.深入审查儿基会 NutriDash 平台、经验教训和未来展望:混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):e062684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062684.
8
Evaluation of a technical advisory board for an occupational injury surveillance research project: A qualitative study.职业伤害监测研究项目技术咨询委员会的评估:一项定性研究
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 8;5(5):e777. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.777. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Enhancing global health security in Thailand: Strengths and challenges of initiating a One Health approach to avian influenza surveillance.加强泰国的全球卫生安全:启动禽流感监测“同一健康”方法的优势与挑战
One Health. 2022 May 11;14:100397. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100397. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Understanding occupational safety and health surveillance: expert consensus on components, attributes and example measures for an evaluation framework.理解职业安全与健康监测:关于评估框架的组成部分、属性及示例措施的专家共识
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;22(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12895-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Descriptive evaluation of methods for identifying work-related emergency department injury visits.工作相关急诊伤害就诊识别方法的描述性评估。
Am J Ind Med. 2019 Jul;62(7):568-579. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22984. Epub 2019 May 19.
2
Multisource surveillance for non-fatal work-related agricultural injuries.多源监测非致命性与工作相关的农业伤害。
J Agromedicine. 2020 Jan;25(1):86-95. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1606746. Epub 2019 May 2.
3
Arizona Hospital Discharge and Emergency Department Database: Implications for Occupational Health Surveillance.亚利桑那州医院出院与急诊科数据库:对职业健康监测的启示
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Apr;59(4):417-423. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000971.
4
Non-fatal agricultural injury surveillance in the United States: A review of national-level survey-based systems.美国非致命性农业伤害监测:基于国家级调查系统的综述。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Jul;60(7):599-620. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22720.
5
Advances in Public Health Surveillance and Information Dissemination at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.疾病控制与预防中心公共卫生监测与信息传播的进展
Public Health Rep. 2017 Jul/Aug;132(4):403-410. doi: 10.1177/0033354917709542. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
6
Evaluation of a state based syndromic surveillance system for the classification and capture of non-fatal occupational injuries and illnesses in New Jersey.新泽西州基于症状监测系统对非致命职业伤害和疾病进行分类与捕获的评估。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Jul;60(7):621-626. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22734. Epub 2017 May 23.
7
Statewide Hospital Discharge Data: Collection, Use, Limitations, and Improvements.全州医院出院数据:收集、使用、局限性及改进
Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1273-99. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12343. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
8
Surveillance systems evaluation: a systematic review of the existing approaches.监测系统评估:现有方法的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 1;15:448. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1791-5.
9
Assessment of timeliness, representativeness and quality of data reported to Italy's national integrated surveillance system for acute viral hepatitis (SEIEVA).评估意大利国家急性病毒性肝炎综合监测系统(SEIEVA)报告数据的及时性、代表性和质量。
Public Health. 2015 May;129(5):561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.015. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
10
The relevance of WHO injury surveillance guidelines for evaluation: learning from the aboriginal community-centered injury surveillance system (ACCISS) and two institution-based systems.世卫组织伤害监测指南评估的相关性:从以原住民为中心的伤害监测系统(ACCISS)和两个基于机构的系统中学习。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep 29;11:744. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-744.

基于疾病预防控制中心更新的指导方针评估俄勒冈州的职业公共卫生监测系统。

Evaluating Oregon's occupational public health surveillance system based on the CDC updated guidelines.

机构信息

School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2020 Aug;63(8):713-725. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23139. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1002/ajim.23139
PMID:32483871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7383881/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Oregon Occupational Public Health Program (OOPHP) monitors occupational health indicators (OHIs) to inform occupational safety and health (OSH) surveillance. In 2018, OOPHP evaluated the performance of the OSH surveillance system and identified areas for future improvement.

METHODS

Following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems, the OOPHP evaluation team engaged internal and external stakeholders using a mixed-methods approach. Operational measures for ten surveillance attributes were developed. Multiple data collection methods resulted in credible evidence for evaluation conclusions. Analyses included summary statistics and qualitative analysis of interviews, a focus group, and online surveys.

RESULTS

Twenty stakeholders took part in this evaluation, with an average participation rate of 55%. Results showed the Oregon OSH surveillance system was simple, flexible, and highly accepted by its stakeholders. Funding security presents challenges for stability. A lack of timeliness of OHIs, low relevance of OHIs to local OSH issues, and the system's ineffectual data dissemination all limit the usefulness of the OSH surveillance system. A review of key data sources for the system showed good data quality and predictive value positive, but relatively poor sensitivity and representativeness.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation team successfully adapted attributes and examples in the CDC guidelines to this Oregon OSH surveillance evaluation. The evaluation findings have informed the development of recommendations for improvements to OOPHP's OSH surveillance. Future research is needed to develop guidance specific to OSH surveillance evaluation.

摘要

背景

俄勒冈职业公共卫生计划(OOPHP)监测职业健康指标(OHIs),为职业安全与健康(OSH)监测提供信息。2018 年,OOPHP 评估了 OSH 监测系统的性能,并确定了未来改进的方向。

方法

根据疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)更新的公共卫生监测系统评估指南,OOPHP 评估小组采用混合方法,让内部和外部利益相关者参与其中。制定了十个监测属性的操作措施。多种数据收集方法为评估结论提供了可靠的证据。分析包括总结统计数据和对访谈、焦点小组和在线调查的定性分析。

结果

共有 20 名利益相关者参与了此次评估,平均参与率为 55%。结果表明,俄勒冈 OSH 监测系统简单、灵活,深受利益相关者的认可。资金安全是稳定性的挑战。OHIs 的及时性不足、OHIs 与当地 OSH 问题的相关性低、以及系统无效的数据传播都限制了 OSH 监测系统的有用性。对系统关键数据源的审查显示数据质量和阳性预测值良好,但敏感性和代表性相对较差。

结论

评估小组成功地将 CDC 指南中的属性和示例应用于俄勒冈 OSH 监测评估。评估结果为改进 OOPHP 的 OSH 监测提供了建议。未来需要研究制定专门针对 OSH 监测评估的指导方针。