FinnHEMS Research and Development Unit, Lentäjäntie 3, FI-01530, Vantaa, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 1;28(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00747-4.
Stroke causes death, disability and increases the use of healthcare resources worldwide. The outcome of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical endovascular thrombectomy highly depends on the delay from symptom onset to initiation of definitive treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the various patient transportation strategies to minimize pre-hospital delays.
Emergency medical services (EMS) mission locations and ambulance response times in Finland with urgent stroke-suspected dispatch codes were collected from Emergency Response Centre (ERC) records between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016. Four transport scenarios were simulated for each mission, comparing ground and helicopter transportation to hospital with different treatment capabilities.
In 2016, a total of 20,513 urgent stroke-suspected missions occurred in Finland. Of these, we were able to locate and calculate a route to scenario-based hospitals in 98.7% (20,240) of the missions. For ground transport, the estimated median pre-hospital time to a thrombolysis-capable and thrombectomy-capable hospital were 54.5 min (95% confidence interval (CI), 31.7-111.4) and 94.4 min (95% CI, 33.3-195.8), respectively. Should patients be transported on the ground to thrombectomy-capable hospitals only, the pre-hospital time would increase in 11,003 (54.4%) of missions, most of which were in rural areas. With the fastest possible transportation method, the estimated mean transport time to a thrombectomy-capable hospital was 80.84 min (median, 80.80 min; 95% CI, 33.3-143.1). Helicopter transportation was the fastest method in 68.8% (13,921) of missions, and the time saved was greater than 30 min in 27.1% (5475) of missions. In rural areas, helicopter transportation was the fastest option in nearly all missions if dispatched simultaneously with ground ambulance.
Helicopter transportation may significantly decrease pre-hospital delays for stroke patients, especially in rural areas, but the selection of an optimal transportation method or chain of methods should be determined case-by-case.
中风在全球范围内导致死亡、残疾,并增加了医疗资源的使用。静脉溶栓和机械血管内血栓切除术的结果高度依赖于从症状发作到开始确定性治疗的延迟。本研究的目的是比较各种患者转运策略,以最大限度地减少院前延误。
从急救响应中心(ERC)记录中收集了 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间芬兰具有紧急中风疑似调度代码的紧急医疗服务(EMS)任务地点和救护车响应时间。为每个任务模拟了四种转运方案,比较了不同治疗能力的地面和直升机到医院的转运。
2016 年,芬兰共发生 20513 例紧急中风疑似任务。在这些任务中,我们能够定位并计算出 98.7%(20240 例)任务到基于情景的医院的路线。对于地面转运,到溶栓能力和取栓能力医院的估计中位院前时间分别为 54.5 分钟(95%置信区间(CI),31.7-111.4)和 94.4 分钟(95%CI,33.3-195.8)。如果患者通过地面转运到取栓能力医院,那么在 11003 例(54.4%)任务中,院前时间将会增加,其中大多数在农村地区。采用最快的转运方法,到取栓能力医院的估计平均转运时间为 80.84 分钟(中位数,80.80 分钟;95%CI,33.3-143.1)。在 68.8%(13921 例)任务中,直升机转运是最快的方法,在 27.1%(5475 例)任务中,节省的时间超过 30 分钟。在农村地区,如果与地面救护车同时调度,直升机转运几乎是所有任务的最快选择。
直升机转运可能显著减少中风患者的院前延误,尤其是在农村地区,但应根据具体情况确定最佳转运方法或方法链的选择。