• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

救护车使用应急灯和警报器及其对患者预后和公共安全的影响:文献综述

The Use of Emergency Lights and Sirens by Ambulances and Their Effect on Patient Outcomes and Public Safety: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

作者信息

Murray Brett, Kue Ricky

机构信息

1Boston University School of Medicine,Boston,MassachusettsUSA.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Apr;32(2):209-216. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001503. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1017/S1049023X16001503
PMID:28134063
Abstract

The benefits of emergency lights and sirens (L&S) use as warning devices by ambulances continue to be a debated topic in Emergency Medical Services (EMS). While the most widely studied aspect of L&S use has been related to their effect on ambulance response and transport times, the literature suggests minimal time savings with more questionable impact on actual patient outcomes. As L&S use has been shown to increase the risk for vehicle crashes, the secondary concern of ambulance design and safety also becomes an important aspect on potential design recommendations that could mitigate the effects of a crash on patients, EMS providers, and the general public. The least studied aspect of L&S use (and probably the most important) is their effect on patient outcomes and quality of medical care during transport. The current evidence suggests no significant improvement on patient outcomes and potential worsening to certain aspects of patient care during transport. The purpose of this review was to examine the current literature regarding ambulance L&S use and the risks they pose to EMS providers, patients, and the general public. In doing so, it will provide sound background for EMS leaders to better develop policies governing the use of L&S by ambulances and promote better research in the patient outcomes effect associated with their use. This review offers some strategies in mitigating the risks associated with L&S use, such as ways to reduce their overall use and modifying other related factors to emergency medical vehicle collisions (EMVCs). Murray B , Kue R . The use of emergency lights and sirens by ambulances and their effect on patient outcomes and public safety: a comprehensive review of the literature. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(2):209-216.

摘要

救护车使用应急灯和警报器作为警示装置的益处,在紧急医疗服务(EMS)领域仍然是一个备受争议的话题。虽然对应急灯和警报器使用的研究最为广泛的方面是其对救护车响应和运输时间的影响,但文献表明节省的时间极少,对实际患者预后的影响也更值得怀疑。由于已证明使用应急灯和警报器会增加车辆碰撞的风险,救护车设计与安全的次要问题也成为潜在设计建议的一个重要方面,这些建议可能会减轻碰撞对患者、EMS提供者和公众的影响。应急灯和警报器使用方面研究最少的(可能也是最重要的)是它们在运输过程中对患者预后和医疗护理质量的影响。目前的证据表明,对患者预后没有显著改善,而且在运输过程中可能会使患者护理的某些方面恶化;本综述的目的是研究当前关于救护车使用应急灯和警报器以及它们给EMS提供者、患者和公众带来的风险的文献。这样做将为EMS领导者更好地制定管理救护车使用应急灯和警报器的政策,并促进对与其使用相关的患者预后影响进行更好的研究提供可靠的背景。本综述提供了一些减轻与使用应急灯和警报器相关风险的策略,例如减少其总体使用的方法以及改变与紧急医疗车辆碰撞(EMVC)相关的其他因素。默里·B、库埃·R。救护车应急灯和警报器的使用及其对患者预后和公共安全的影响:文献综述。院前灾难医学。201年;32(2):209 - 216。

相似文献

1
The Use of Emergency Lights and Sirens by Ambulances and Their Effect on Patient Outcomes and Public Safety: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.救护车使用应急灯和警报器及其对患者预后和公共安全的影响:文献综述
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Apr;32(2):209-216. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001503. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
2
Is Use of Warning Lights and Sirens Associated With Increased Risk of Ambulance Crashes? A Contemporary Analysis Using National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) Data.使用警示灯和警笛是否会增加救护车碰撞的风险?使用国家紧急医疗服务信息系统(NEMSIS)数据的当代分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;74(1):101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.032. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
3
Emergency medical vehicle collisions in an urban system.城市系统中的急救车辆碰撞事故。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996 Jul-Sep;11(3):195-201. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00042941.
4
Does crash risk increase when emergency vehicles are driving with lights and sirens?当应急车辆开启警示灯和警笛行驶时,碰撞风险是否会增加?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Apr;113:257-262. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
5
EMT knowledge of ambulance traffic laws.急救医疗技术员对救护车交通法规的了解。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998 Apr-Jun;2(2):136-40. doi: 10.1080/10903129808958858.
6
EMS Termination Of Resuscitation And Pronouncement of Death紧急医疗服务终止复苏及宣布死亡
7
EMS Lights And Sirens急救医疗服务灯光与警笛
8
Ambulance dispatch prioritisation for traffic crashes using machine learning: A natural language approach.基于自然语言处理的机器学习在交通伤中的急救车派遣优先级研究
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Dec;168:104886. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104886. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
Patient outcome using medical protocol to limit "lights and siren" transport.采用医疗方案限制“亮灯鸣笛”转运的患者预后。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994 Oct-Dec;9(4):226-9. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00041443.
10
The Effect of Ambulance Staffing Models in a Metropolitan, Fire-Based EMS System.大城市基于消防的急救医疗服务系统中救护车人员配备模式的影响
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Apr;32(2):175-179. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001539. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding EMS response times: a machine learning-based analysis.了解急救医疗服务响应时间:基于机器学习的分析
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02975-z.
2
Impact of Traffic Patterns on Trauma Response Prenotification [Response to Letter].交通模式对创伤反应预先通知的影响[对信件的回复]
Open Access Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 3;17:63-64. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S517871. eCollection 2025.
3
Highlights From the 2023 Revision of Pediatric Tactical Emergency Casualty Care Guidelines.《2023年小儿战术紧急伤亡护理指南修订版要点》
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2025 Feb 1;41(2):154-157. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003292. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
4
Attitude and Behavior of Road Users Responding to EMS Ambulances in Developing Countries: a Cross-sectional Study.发展中国家道路使用者对急救医疗服务救护车的态度与行为:一项横断面研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 20;12(1):e57. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2262. eCollection 2024.
5
Effect of urgency level on prehospital emergency transport times: a natural experiment. urgency 对院前急救转运时间的影响:一项自然实验。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;19(2):445-453. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03501-7. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
6
Navigating into the unknown: exploring the experience of exposure to prehospital emergency stressors: a sequential explanatory mixed-methods.探索未知:探索暴露于院前应急压力源的体验:顺序解释性混合方法。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 15;23(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00906-7.
7
How do current police practices impact trauma care in the prehospital setting? A scoping review.当前警察的做法如何影响院前环境中的创伤护理?一项范围综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 May 23;4(3):e12974. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12974. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Traffic safety knowledge gain of ambulance drivers after simulator-based training.基于模拟器的培训后救护车司机交通安全知识的获得。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03279-w.
9
Driving Speeds in Urgent and Non-Urgent Ambulance Missions during Normal and Reduced Winter Speed Limit Periods-A Descriptive Study.正常及冬季限速降低期间紧急与非紧急救护车任务中的行驶速度——一项描述性研究
Nurs Rep. 2022 Feb 3;12(1):50-58. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12010006.
10
Driving the ambulance: an essential component of emergency medical services: an integrative review.驾驶救护车:急诊医疗服务的重要组成部分:综合述评。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 18;21(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00554-9.