Division of Psychiatry, UCL Faculty of Brain Sciences, Sixth Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK.
J Aging Stud. 2020 Jun;53:100851. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100851. Epub 2020 May 15.
This paper outlines the case for applying Bourdieu's writing on 'forms of capital' to the explication of the social divisions of later life. Much of the writing about class in later life pivots on the distinction between working and non-working life. Broadening the focus towards a more Bourdieusian conceptualisation of forms of capital offers a greater potential to delineate and account for social stratification in later life than that accorded by either treating older retired people as a more or less homogenously marginal class or by applying class analyses to later life based on the relations of capital and labour. The paper begins with an outline of Bourdieu's account of the three main forms of capital and their symbolic representation. This is followed by consideration of the various critiques that have been made of Bourdieu's formulation of his capitals alongside various elaborations and re-formulations. Finally various potential avenues are explored to illustrate how forms of capital may be realised in later life and the role they may play in determining its social stratification. Examples range from the financial capital represented by home ownership to the investment in embodied cultural capital made by the various technologies of the self that characterise third age cultures.
本文概述了将布迪厄关于“资本形式”的论述应用于阐释晚年社会划分的理由。关于晚年阶级的大部分论述都围绕着工作和非工作生活之间的区别。将重点进一步扩大到更具布迪厄式的资本形式概念化,比将年长的退休人员视为或多或少同质的边缘阶级,或者根据资本和劳动关系将阶级分析应用于晚年生活,更有潜力来划定和解释晚年生活中的社会分层。本文首先概述了布迪厄关于三种主要资本形式及其符号表现的论述。其次,考虑了对布迪厄对其资本的表述提出的各种批评,以及对这些表述的各种阐述和重新表述。最后,探讨了各种潜在的途径,以说明资本形式如何在晚年得以实现,以及它们在决定晚年的社会分层方面可能发挥的作用。这些例子从代表房屋所有权的金融资本到构成第三年龄文化特征的各种自我技术所进行的体现文化资本的投资不等。