University of Oslo.
University of Bergen.
Br J Sociol. 2018 Mar;69(1):124-153. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12295. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
In this article, we address whether and how contemporary social classes are marked by distinct lifestyles. We assess the model of the social space, a novel approach to class analysis pioneered by Bourdieu's Distinction. Although pivotal in Bourdieu's work, this model is too often overlooked in later research, making its contemporary relevance difficult to assess. We redress this by using the social space as a framework through which to study the cultural manifestation of class divisions in lifestyle differences in contemporary Norwegian society. Through a Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) of unusually rich survey data, we reveal a structure strikingly similar to the model in Distinction, with a primary dimension of the volume of capital, and a secondary dimension of the composition of capital. While avoiding the substantialist fallacy of predefined notions of 'highbrow' and 'lowbrow' tastes, we explore how 168 lifestyle items map onto this social space. This reveals distinct classed lifestyles according to both dimensions of the social space. The lifestyles of the upper classes are distinctly demanding in terms of resources. Among those rich in economic capital, this manifests itself in a lifestyle which involves a quest for excitement, and which is bodily oriented and expensive. For their counterparts rich in cultural capital, a more ascetic and intellectually oriented lifestyle manifests itself, demanding of resources in the sense of requiring symbolic mastery, combining a taste for canonized, legitimate culture with more cosmopolitan and 'popular' items. In contrast to many studies' descriptions of the lower classes as 'disengaged' and 'inactive', we find evidence of distinct tastes on their part. Our analysis thus affirms the validity of Bourdieu's model of social class and the contention that classes tend to take the form of status groups. We challenge dominant positions in cultural stratification research, while questioning the aptness of the metaphor of the 'omnivore', as well as recent analyses of 'emerging cultural capital'.
本文探讨了当代社会阶级是否以及如何通过独特的生活方式来体现。我们评估了社会空间模型,这是布迪厄的《区隔》(Distinction)开创的一种阶级分析的新方法。尽管这一模型在布迪厄的著作中至关重要,但在后来的研究中却经常被忽视,因此难以评估其当代相关性。我们通过将社会空间作为一个框架,来研究当代挪威社会中生活方式差异所体现的阶级划分的文化表现,从而纠正了这一问题。通过对异常丰富的调查数据进行多元对应分析(MCA),我们揭示了一个与《区隔》中的模型非常相似的结构,其中一个主要维度是资本的数量,另一个次要维度是资本的构成。虽然我们避免了预先设定“高雅”和“低俗”品味的概念所带来的实质主义谬误,但我们还是探讨了 168 种生活方式项目如何映射到这个社会空间。这揭示了根据社会空间的两个维度形成的明显的阶级生活方式。上层阶级的生活方式在资源方面要求很高。在那些拥有丰富经济资本的人中,这种生活方式表现为对刺激的追求,并且是身体导向和昂贵的。对于那些拥有丰富文化资本的人来说,表现出一种更为禁欲和以知识为导向的生活方式,需要在资源方面进行象征性的掌握,将对经典、合法文化的品味与更具世界性和“流行”的物品相结合。与许多研究对下层阶级“漠不关心”和“不活跃”的描述相反,我们发现他们有明显的品味。因此,我们的分析肯定了布迪厄的社会阶级模型的有效性,以及阶级倾向于形成地位群体的论点。我们对文化分层研究中的主流观点提出了挑战,同时质疑了“杂食者”的隐喻以及最近对“新兴文化资本”的分析的恰当性。