• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在晚期癌症患者的临床试验中如何提供最佳支持性护理?对已注册临床试验方案的综述。

How is best supportive care provided in clinical trials for patients with advanced cancer? A review of registered protocols of clinical trials.

机构信息

Hospital Universitario del Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.

Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(2):e100-e105. doi: 10.3747/co.27.5365. Epub 2020 May 1.

DOI:10.3747/co.27.5365
PMID:32489259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7253756/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2012, 11 standards describing best supportive care (bsc) in clinical trials in advanced cancer were defined through consensus statements. The consensus included 15 key components. Our objective was to analyze whether clinical trials that involved patients with advanced cancer and that included bsc in at least 1 arm met the standards and contained the key components.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, the isrctn (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number) registry, the EU Clinical Trials Register, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for 2012-2018. We selected only phase iii studies in patients with advanced cancer that included bsc in at least 1 arm. We describe the characteristics of the trials, together with the definition and components of bsc. We analyzed how the trials met the standards and adopted the key components of bsc.

RESULTS

Of 193 trials retrieved, only 64 met the inclusion criteria; 36 of those trials (56%) had no definition of bsc. Less than 7% of the trials included even 3 of the 8 bsc standards that were defined to be included in the design of trials. Furthermore, trials mentioned only 5 of the 15 key components that the consensus defined to be fundamental, with symptom management appearing in 22% of trials and the other 4 components appearing in less than 8%.

SUMMARY

Most clinical trials registered during 2012-2018 that involved patients with cancer and an arm with bsc did not define the bsc concept. Hence, the design of those trials does not meet the consensus recommendations.

摘要

背景

2012 年,通过共识声明定义了 11 项描述晚期癌症临床试验中最佳支持治疗(bsc)的标准。共识包括 15 个关键组成部分。我们的目的是分析涉及晚期癌症患者且至少在一个臂中包含 bsc 的临床试验是否符合标准并包含关键组成部分。

方法

我们回顾了 2012-2018 年在 ClinicalTrials.gov、isrctn(国际标准随机对照试验编号)注册处、欧盟临床试验注册处和国际临床试验注册平台上注册的临床试验。我们仅选择了至少在一个臂中包含 bsc 的晚期癌症患者的 III 期研究。我们描述了试验的特征,以及 bsc 的定义和组成部分。我们分析了试验如何符合标准并采用了 bsc 的关键组成部分。

结果

在检索到的 193 项试验中,只有 64 项符合纳入标准;其中 36 项试验(56%)没有 bsc 的定义。不到 7%的试验甚至包括 8 项 bsc 标准中的 3 项,这些标准被定义为纳入试验设计。此外,试验仅提到了共识定义为基本的 15 个关键组成部分中的 5 个,其中症状管理出现在 22%的试验中,而其他 4 个组成部分出现在不到 8%的试验中。

总结

2012-2018 年期间注册的涉及癌症患者和 bsc 臂的大多数临床试验都没有定义 bsc 概念。因此,这些试验的设计不符合共识建议。

相似文献

1
How is best supportive care provided in clinical trials for patients with advanced cancer? A review of registered protocols of clinical trials.在晚期癌症患者的临床试验中如何提供最佳支持性护理?对已注册临床试验方案的综述。
Curr Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(2):e100-e105. doi: 10.3747/co.27.5365. Epub 2020 May 1.
2
Best supportive care in clinical trials: review of the inconsistency in control arm design.临床试验中的最佳支持性治疗:对照臂设计不一致性的综述
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):6-11. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.192. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
3
Supportive care for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.胃肠道癌症患者的支持性护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(3):CD003445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003445.pub2.
4
Everolimus, lutetium-177 DOTATATE and sunitinib for advanced, unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours with disease progression: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.依维莫司、镥[177Lu]DOTATATE 和舒尼替尼治疗晚期、不可切除或转移性神经内分泌肿瘤且疾病进展:系统评价和成本效果分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Sep;22(49):1-326. doi: 10.3310/hta22490.
5
Implementation of supportive care and best supportive care interventions in clinical trials enrolling patients with cancer†.支持性治疗和最佳支持性治疗干预在招募癌症患者的临床试验中的实施情况。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1838-1845. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv207. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
6
What constitutes best supportive care in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients?--Results from the lung cancer economics and outcomes research (LUCEOR) study.在治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者时,什么构成了最佳支持治疗?——来自肺癌经济学和结果研究(LUCEOR)的结果。
Lung Cancer. 2013 Oct;82(1):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.06.023. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
7
Best supportive care: a euphemism for no care or a standard of good care?最佳支持性治疗:是不治疗或良好治疗标准的委婉说法?
Semin Oncol. 2011 Jun;38(3):351-7. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.002.
8
Consensus-based standards for best supportive care in clinical trials in advanced cancer.癌症晚期临床试验中最佳支持治疗的基于共识的标准。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):e77-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70215-7.
9
Erlotinib and gefitinib for treating non-small cell lung cancer that has progressed following prior chemotherapy (review of NICE technology appraisals 162 and 175): a systematic review and economic evaluation.厄洛替尼和吉非替尼用于治疗先前化疗后进展的非小细胞肺癌(英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所技术评估162和175回顾):一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jun;19(47):1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta19470.
10
A comparison of five international clinical trial registers with the South African register for access to information and usability.五项国际临床试验登记册与南非获取信息和可用性登记册的比较。
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Apr 24;29:224. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.29.224.12683. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy Versus Best Supportive Care for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.免疫疗法或靶向疗法与晚期胃癌的最佳支持治疗对比:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Mar 4;56(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01155-y.
2
Systemic Oncological Treatments versus Supportive Care for Patients with Advanced Hepatobiliary Cancers: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.晚期肝胆癌患者的全身肿瘤治疗与支持性治疗:系统评价概述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 26;15(3):766. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030766.

本文引用的文献

1
Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer.晚期癌症成年患者的早期姑息治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 12;6(6):CD011129. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011129.pub2.
2
Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.姑息治疗融入标准肿瘤学治疗中:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):96-112. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.1474. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
3
Toward Evidence-Based End-of-Life Care.迈向基于证据的临终关怀。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2001-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1509664. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
4
Best supportive care in clinical trials: review of the inconsistency in control arm design.临床试验中的最佳支持性治疗:对照臂设计不一致性的综述
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):6-11. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.192. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
5
Implementation of supportive care and best supportive care interventions in clinical trials enrolling patients with cancer†.支持性治疗和最佳支持性治疗干预在招募癌症患者的临床试验中的实施情况。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1838-1845. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv207. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
6
What constitutes best supportive care in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients?--Results from the lung cancer economics and outcomes research (LUCEOR) study.在治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者时,什么构成了最佳支持治疗?——来自肺癌经济学和结果研究(LUCEOR)的结果。
Lung Cancer. 2013 Oct;82(1):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.06.023. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
7
Early integration of palliative care services with standard oncology care for patients with advanced cancer.晚期癌症患者的姑息治疗服务与标准肿瘤治疗的早期整合。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Sep;63(5):349-63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21192. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
8
Consensus-based standards for best supportive care in clinical trials in advanced cancer.癌症晚期临床试验中最佳支持治疗的基于共识的标准。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):e77-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70215-7.
9
The lack of standard definitions in the supportive and palliative oncology literature.支持治疗与姑息治疗肿瘤学文献中缺乏标准定义。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Mar;43(3):582-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.016. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
10
Improving the methodologic and ethical validity of best supportive care studies in oncology: lessons from a systematic review.提高肿瘤学最佳支持治疗研究的方法学和伦理有效性:系统评价的启示。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5476-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9592. Epub 2009 Jun 29.