Knegt Bram, Meijer Tomas T, Kant Merijn R, Kiers E Toby, Egas Martijn
Department of Evolutionary and Population Biology Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Department of Ecological Science VU University Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr 12;10(10):4375-4390. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6204. eCollection 2020 May.
Plant defense suppression is an offensive strategy of herbivores, in which they manipulate plant physiological processes to increase their performance. Paradoxically, defense suppression does not always benefit the defense-suppressing herbivores, because lowered plant defenses can also enhance the performance of competing herbivores and can expose herbivores to increased predation. Suppression of plant defense may therefore entail considerable ecological costs depending on the presence of competitors and natural enemies in a community. Hence, we hypothesize that the optimal magnitude of suppression differs among locations. To investigate this, we studied defense suppression across populations of spider mites, a herbivore from South America that is an invasive pest of solanaceous plants including cultivated tomato, , in other parts of the world. We measured the level of expression of defense marker genes in tomato plants after infestation with mites from eleven different populations. These populations were chosen across a range of native (South American) and non-native (other continents) environments and from different host plant species. We found significant variation at three out of four defense marker genes, demonstrating that populations suppress jasmonic acid- and salicylic acid-dependent plant signaling pathways to varying degrees. While we found no indication that this variation in defense suppression was explained by differences in host plant species, invasive populations tended to suppress plant defense to a smaller extent than native populations. This may reflect either the genetic lineage of -as all invasive populations we studied belong to one linage and both native populations to another-or the absence of specialized natural enemies in invasive populations.
植物防御抑制是食草动物的一种进攻策略,即它们操纵植物生理过程以提高自身生存能力。矛盾的是,防御抑制并不总是对实施防御抑制的食草动物有益,因为植物防御能力降低也会增强竞争食草动物的生存能力,还会使食草动物面临更高的被捕食风险。因此,根据群落中竞争者和天敌的存在情况,植物防御抑制可能会带来相当大的生态成本。所以,我们推测不同地点的防御抑制最佳程度有所不同。为了研究这一点,我们对红蜘蛛种群的防御抑制情况进行了研究,红蜘蛛是一种来自南美洲的食草动物,在世界其他地区是包括栽培番茄在内的茄科植物的入侵害虫。我们测量了用来自11个不同种群的螨虫侵染后番茄植株中防御标记基因的表达水平。这些种群选自一系列原生(南美洲)和非原生(其他大陆)环境以及不同的寄主植物物种。我们发现四个防御标记基因中有三个存在显著差异,这表明不同种群对茉莉酸和水杨酸依赖的植物信号通路的抑制程度不同。虽然我们没有发现防御抑制的这种差异是由寄主植物物种差异所解释的迹象,但入侵种群对植物防御的抑制程度往往比原生种群小。这可能反映了——因为我们研究的所有入侵种群都属于一个谱系,而两个原生种群属于另一个谱系——或者入侵种群中缺乏专门的天敌。