Gorvel Laurent, Olive Daniel
Cancer Research Center of Marseille, INSERM U1068, CNRS U7258, Aix Marseille Université, Institut Paoli - Calmettes, Marseille, France.
F1000Res. 2020 May 13;9. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22877.1. eCollection 2020.
Checkpoint inhibitors have become an efficient way to treat cancers. Indeed, anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD1, and anti-PDL-1 antibodies are now used as therapies for cancers. However, while these therapies are very efficient in certain tumors, they remain poorly efficient in others. This might be explained by the immune infiltrate, the expression of target molecules, and the influence of the tumor microenvironment. It is therefore critical to identify checkpoint antigens that represent alternative targets for immunotherapies. PVR-like molecules play regulatory roles in immune cell functions. These proteins are expressed by different cell types and have been shown to be upregulated in various malignancies. PVR and Nectin-2 are expressed by tumor cells as well as myeloid cells, while TIGIT, CD96, and DNAM-1 are expressed on effector lymphoid cells. PVR is able to bind DNAM-1, CD96, and TIGIT, which results in two distinct profiles of effector cell activation. Indeed, while binding to DNAM-1 induces the release of cytokines and cytotoxicity of cytotoxic effector cells, binding TIGIT induces an immunosuppressive and non-cytotoxic profile. PVR is also able to bind CD96, which induces an immunosuppressive response in murine models. Unfortunately, in humans, results remain contradictory, and this interaction might induce the activation or the suppression of the immune response. Similarly, Nectin-2 was shown to bind TIGIT and to induce regulatory profiles in effectors cells such as NK and T cells. Therefore, these data highlight the potential of each of the molecules of the "PVR-TIGIT axis" as a potential target for immune checkpoint therapy. However, many questions remain to be answered to fully understand the mechanisms of this synapse, in particular for human CD96 and Nectin-2, which are still understudied. Here, we review the recent advances in "PVR-TIGIT axis" research and discuss the potential of targeting this axis by checkpoint immunotherapies.
检查点抑制剂已成为治疗癌症的一种有效方法。事实上,抗CTLA - 4、抗PD1和抗PDL - 1抗体目前被用作癌症治疗药物。然而,虽然这些疗法在某些肿瘤中非常有效,但在其他肿瘤中仍然效果不佳。这可能是由免疫浸润、靶分子的表达以及肿瘤微环境的影响所解释的。因此,识别代表免疫治疗替代靶点的检查点抗原至关重要。PVR样分子在免疫细胞功能中发挥调节作用。这些蛋白质由不同细胞类型表达,并已显示在各种恶性肿瘤中上调。PVR和Nectin - 2由肿瘤细胞以及髓样细胞表达,而TIGIT、CD96和DNAM - 1在效应淋巴细胞上表达。PVR能够结合DNAM - 1、CD96和TIGIT,这导致效应细胞激活的两种不同模式。事实上,与DNAM - 1结合会诱导细胞毒性效应细胞释放细胞因子并产生细胞毒性,而与TIGIT结合则会诱导免疫抑制和非细胞毒性模式。PVR也能够结合CD96,这在小鼠模型中诱导免疫抑制反应。不幸的是,在人类中,结果仍然相互矛盾,这种相互作用可能会诱导免疫反应的激活或抑制。同样,Nectin - 2被证明能结合TIGIT并在效应细胞如NK细胞和T细胞中诱导调节模式。因此,这些数据突出了“PVR - TIGIT轴”中每个分子作为免疫检查点治疗潜在靶点的潜力。然而,要完全理解这种突触的机制,仍有许多问题有待解答,特别是对于人类CD96和Nectin - 2,它们仍未得到充分研究。在这里,我们综述了“PVR - TIGIT轴”研究的最新进展,并讨论了通过检查点免疫疗法靶向该轴的潜力。