Suppr超能文献

重组烟曲霉抗原在诊断哮喘患者烟曲霉致敏中的作用。

Role of recombinant Aspergillus fumigatus antigens in diagnosing Aspergillus sensitisation among asthmatics.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2020 Sep;63(9):928-936. doi: 10.1111/myc.13124. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of Aspergillus-sensitised asthma (ASA) and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is made using IgE against crude antigens of A fumigatus (cAsp). However, the IgE against cAsp has limitations due to cross-reactivity with other fungi.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of recombinant A fumigatus (rAsp) antigens in detecting ASA and their role in differentiating true from cross-sensitisation.

METHODS

We performed IgE against rAsp (f 1, f 2, f 3, f 4 and f 6), cAsp and other fungal (Alternaria, Candida, Cladosporium, Malassezia and Trichophyton) antigens in subjects with A fumigatus-unsensitised asthma (Af-UA [n = 51]), ASA (n = 71) and ABPA (n = 123). The diagnoses were made using cAsp-IgE and compared using rAsp-IgE. Subjects with elevated cAsp-IgE, but negative rAsp f 1 and f 2, were presumed to lack true A fumigatus sensitisation.

RESULTS

The prevalence of any rAsp antigen positivity (cut-off, 0.35 kUA/L) varied from 2%-22%, 32%-73% and 84%-98% for Af-UA, ASA and ABPA, respectively. The prevalence of sensitisation to other fungi ranged from 29%-65%, 59%-85% and 87%-95%, respectively, among subjects with Af-UA, ASA and ABPA. Nineteen subjects of ASA and one subject with ABPA were positive with cAsp-IgE but negative for rAsp f 1 and f 2 and were also cross-sensitised to at least one of the other fungi. Five subjects of Af-UA (cAsp-IgE negative) were rAsp f 1 or f 2 positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Crude Aspergillus antigens may misclassify Aspergillus sensitisation among asthmatics. IgE against rAsp antigens (f 1 and f 2) potentially detect true Aspergillus sensitisation and could be used for this purpose.

摘要

背景

曲霉致敏性哮喘(ASA)和变应性支气管肺曲霉病(ABPA)的诊断是基于对烟曲霉粗抗原(cAsp)的 IgE 进行的。然而,由于与其他真菌的交叉反应,cAsp 的 IgE 存在局限性。

目的

评估重组烟曲霉(rAsp)抗原在检测 ASA 中的作用及其在区分真正致敏与交叉致敏中的作用。

方法

我们对烟曲霉未致敏哮喘(Af-UA [n=51])、ASA(n=71)和 ABPA(n=123)患者进行了 rAsp(f1、f2、f3、f4 和 f6)、cAsp 和其他真菌(交链孢霉、念珠菌、枝孢霉、马拉色菌和毛癣菌)抗原的 IgE 检测。使用 cAsp-IgE 进行诊断,并使用 rAsp-IgE 进行比较。cAsp-IgE 升高但 rAsp f1 和 f2 阴性的患者被认为缺乏真正的烟曲霉致敏。

结果

任何 rAsp 抗原阳性的患病率(cut-off 值为 0.35 kUA/L)在 Af-UA、ASA 和 ABPA 患者中分别为 2%-22%、32%-73%和 84%-98%。在 Af-UA、ASA 和 ABPA 患者中,对其他真菌的致敏率分别为 29%-65%、59%-85%和 87%-95%。19 例 ASA 患者和 1 例 ABPA 患者 cAsp-IgE 阳性但 rAsp f1 和 f2 阴性,并且还对至少一种其他真菌交叉致敏。5 例 Af-UA 患者(cAsp-IgE 阴性)rAsp f1 或 f2 阳性。

结论

粗制曲霉抗原可能会使哮喘患者的曲霉致敏分类错误。针对 rAsp 抗原(f1 和 f2)的 IgE 可能会检测到真正的曲霉致敏,可用于此目的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验