Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Division of Inpatient Medicine, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah.
J Hosp Med. 2020 Jun;15(6):325-330. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3417.
Hospitals are increasingly adopting ward-based high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) protocols that allow HFNC treatment of bronchiolitis outside of the intensive care unit (ICU). Our objective was to determine whether adoption of a ward-based HFNC protocol reduces ICU utilization.
We examined a retrospective cohort of infants aged 3 to 24 months hospitalized with bronchiolitis at hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System database. The study exposure was adoption of a ward-based HFNC protocol, measured by direct contact with pediatric hospital medicine leaders at each hospital. All analyses utilized an interrupted time series approach. The primary analysis compared outcomes three respiratory seasons before and three respiratory seasons after HFNC adoption, among adopting hospitals. Supplementary analysis 1 mirrored the primary analysis with the exception that the first season after adoption was censored. In supplementary analysis 2, effects among nonadopting hospitals were subtracted from effects measured among adopting hospitals.
Of 44 contacted hospitals, 41 replied (93% response rate), of which 18 were categorized as non-adopting hospitals and 12 were categorized as adopting hospitals. Included ward-based HFNC protocols were adopted between the 2010-2011 and 2015-2016 respiratory seasons. The primary analysis included 26,253 bronchiolitis encounters and measured immediate increases in the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU (absolute difference, 3.1%; 95% CI, 2.8%-3.4%) and ICU length of stay (absolute difference, 9.1 days per 100 patients; 95% CI, 5.1-13.2). Both supplementary analyses yielded similar findings.
Early protocols for ward-based HFNC were paradoxically associated with increased ICU utilization.
医院越来越多地采用基于病房的高流量鼻导管(HFNC)方案,允许在重症监护病房(ICU)之外使用 HFNC 治疗细支气管炎。我们的目的是确定采用基于病房的 HFNC 方案是否会降低 ICU 的使用。
我们研究了儿科健康信息系统数据库中因细支气管炎住院的 3 至 24 个月大婴儿的回顾性队列。研究暴露是采用基于病房的 HFNC 方案,通过与每家医院的儿科医院医学领导人直接接触来衡量。所有分析均采用中断时间序列方法。主要分析比较了 HFNC 采用前三个呼吸季节和采用后三个呼吸季节的结果,仅在采用医院中进行。补充分析 1 与主要分析相似,但采用后的第一个季节被排除在外。在补充分析 2 中,从采用医院中测量的效果中减去非采用医院的效果。
在联系的 44 家医院中,有 41 家(93%的回复率)做出了回复,其中 18 家被归类为非采用医院,12 家被归类为采用医院。包括基于病房的 HFNC 方案在内,分别在 2010-2011 年和 2015-2016 年的呼吸季节中采用。主要分析包括 26253 例细支气管炎就诊,并测量了 ICU 入院率(绝对差异,3.1%;95%CI,2.8%-3.4%)和 ICU 住院时间(绝对差异,每 100 例患者增加 9.1 天;95%CI,5.1-13.2)的即刻增加。两个补充分析都得出了类似的发现。
早期基于病房的 HFNC 方案反而与 ICU 利用率的增加有关。