Riese Jeffrey, Porter Timothy, Fierce Jamie, Riese Alison, Richardson Troy, Alverson Brian K
Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Providence, Rhode Island; and
Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Providence, Rhode Island; and.
Hosp Pediatr. 2017 Apr;7(4):197-203. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2016-0195. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
The goal of this study was to assess the association of the introduction of a ward's high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) guideline with clinical outcomes of infants with bronchiolitis.
We conducted a retrospective, pre-post intervention study with an interrupted time series analysis of infants admitted with bronchiolitis between 2010 and 2014 at an urban, tertiary care children's hospital. Patients admitted in the 24 months before and after initiation of a guideline for HFNC use on the general wards were compared. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were PICU transfer rate and length of stay, intubation rate, and 30-day readmission, adjusted for season.
A total of 1937 patients met inclusion criteria; 936 were admitted before and 1001 admitted after the introduction of HFNC use on the general wards. Comparing the 2 groups, the hospital-wide rate of HFNC use in bronchiolitis treatment increased after HFNC became available on the wards (23.9% vs 35.2%; < .001). The ward's HFNC guideline was not associated with a change in preintervention trajectory of total hospital length of stay ( = .48), PICU length of stay ( = .06), or rate of PICU transfer ( = .97). There was also no difference in intubation rate or 30-day readmission between the 2 groups.
Initiating a guideline for HFNC use on the general pediatric wards was associated with an increase in the use of the intervention with no significant change in total hospital length of stay, PICU length of stay and transfer rate, intubation rate, or 30-day readmission for patients with bronchiolitis.
本研究的目的是评估病房高流量鼻导管(HFNC)指南的引入与毛细支气管炎婴儿临床结局之间的关联。
我们进行了一项回顾性、干预前后研究,并对2010年至2014年期间在一家城市三级护理儿童医院因毛细支气管炎入院的婴儿进行了中断时间序列分析。比较了在普通病房开始使用HFNC指南前后24个月内入院的患者。主要结局是住院时间。次要结局是转入儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的比率和住院时间、插管率以及30天再入院率,并对季节进行了校正。
共有1937例患者符合纳入标准;936例在普通病房开始使用HFNC之前入院,1001例在之后入院。比较两组,病房内可使用HFNC后,毛细支气管炎治疗中全院HFNC使用率有所增加(23.9%对35.2%;<0.001)。病房的HFNC指南与干预前总住院时间(=0.48)、PICU住院时间(=0.06)或转入PICU的比率(=0.97)的变化无关。两组之间的插管率或30天再入院率也没有差异。
在普通儿科病房启动HFNC使用指南与该干预措施使用的增加相关,但对于毛细支气管炎患者,总住院时间、PICU住院时间和转入率、插管率或30天再入院率没有显著变化。