• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际功能、残疾和健康分类在专业康复中的应用:评估工作残疾的工具。

International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability.

机构信息

Diretoria de Saúde e Qualidade de Vida do Servidor Federal, Universidade Federal do Acre, Rio Branco, AC, Brasil.

Departamento de Epidemiologia e Métodos Quantitativos em Saúde, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:45. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001463. Epub 2020 May 20.

DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001463
PMID:32491090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7190096/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE To review the main instruments of functional assessment and health status cited in the literature to evaluate Brazilian workers and verify the compatibility of their items with the core set for professional rehabilitation. METHODS A review of the literature was conducted in the main databases in search of articles that used assessment instruments in populations of workers between 2007 and 2017. Subsequently, the contents of the identified instruments were retrieved, and two evaluators analyzed their items to verify the compatibility with the categories of the core set of the International Classification of Functioning for professional rehabilitation. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the agreement between the evaluators. RESULTS Five specific and eight generic instruments were selected to evaluate the functioning of workers. The analysis of the items of the total instruments allowed the definition of 58 categories (64.5%) of the core set with minimal overlap: 13 (76.5%) of the body functions component, 29 (72.5%) of the activities and participation component and 16 (49%) environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS The association of several instruments requires time and makes it difficult to use the classification. The development of instruments with direct association with its categories is essential to operationalize it.

摘要

目的

回顾文献中用于评估巴西劳动者的主要功能评估和健康状况工具,并验证其项目与专业康复核心组的兼容性。

方法

在主要数据库中进行文献回顾,以搜索 2007 年至 2017 年间使用评估工具的劳动者人群的文章。随后,检索确定工具的内容,并由两名评估员分析其项目,以验证与专业康复国际功能分类核心组的类别是否兼容。使用 Cohen's kappa 系数评估评估员之间的一致性。

结果

选择了 5 种特定工具和 8 种通用工具来评估劳动者的功能。对总工具项目的分析确定了核心组的 58 个类别(64.5%),最小重叠:身体功能组件 13 个(76.5%)、活动和参与组件 29 个(72.5%)和环境因素 16 个(49%)。

结论

多种工具的联合使用需要时间,并且难以使用分类。开发与分类直接相关的工具对于使其操作化至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e0a/7190096/8a06317a7504/1518-8787-rsp-54-45-gf01-pt.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e0a/7190096/0790018f838d/1518-8787-rsp-54-45-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e0a/7190096/8a06317a7504/1518-8787-rsp-54-45-gf01-pt.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e0a/7190096/0790018f838d/1518-8787-rsp-54-45-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e0a/7190096/8a06317a7504/1518-8787-rsp-54-45-gf01-pt.jpg

相似文献

1
International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability.国际功能、残疾和健康分类在专业康复中的应用:评估工作残疾的工具。
Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:45. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001463. Epub 2020 May 20.
2
Toward the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Rehabilitation Set: A Minimal Generic Set of Domains for Rehabilitation as a Health Strategy.迈向《国际功能、残疾与健康分类》(ICF)康复组合:作为一项健康战略的康复领域最小通用集。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
3
Common content between quality of life questionnaires for children with cystic fibrosis and the International Classification of Functionality, Disability and Health.儿童囊性纤维化生活质量问卷与国际功能、残疾和健康分类的常见内容。
J Rehabil Med. 2019 Sep 3;51(8):582-586. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2571.
4
Linking of assessment scales for women with urinary incontinence and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.将尿失禁女性评估量表与国际功能、残疾和健康分类相联系。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jun;41(12):1443-1449. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1431695. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
Crosswalk of participation self-report measures for aphasia to the ICF: what content is being measured?失语症参与自我报告测量与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)的交叉对照:所测量的内容是什么?
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(13):1113-24. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.955132. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
6
Measuring work functioning in individuals with musculoskeletal disorders with reference to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: a systematic literature review.参照《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的工作功能进行测量:一项系统文献综述。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Jun;41(2):97-109. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000283.
7
Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF).基于国际功能、残疾与健康分类(ICF)的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)量表的内容比较
Qual Life Res. 2005 Jun;14(5):1225-37. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-4773-0.
8
Linking the EASY-care standard to the international classification of functioning, disability and health.将EASY-care标准与国际功能、残疾和健康分类相联系。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(7):593-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.804598. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类测量功能:qualifier 评级与现有健康状况量表的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):541-548. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
10
European validation of The Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Osteoarthritis from the perspective of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip.从膝或髋骨关节炎患者角度对骨关节炎功能、残疾和健康国际分类综合核心集的欧洲验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Dec;40(26):3104-3112. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1377295. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Construct validity of the Brazilian QuickDASH for assessing work-related upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders.用于评估与工作相关的上肢肌肉骨骼疾病的巴西版QuickDASH的结构效度。
Hand Ther. 2025 May 21:17589983251345380. doi: 10.1177/17589983251345380.
2
A general framework for selecting work participation outcomes in intervention studies among persons with health problems: a concept paper.健康问题人群干预研究中工作参与结局选择的通用框架:概念论文。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 26;22(1):2189. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14564-0.

本文引用的文献

1
[Aspects of the current workers' rehabilitation scenario in Brazil: strides and setbacks].[巴西当前工人康复情况的各个方面:进展与挫折]
Cad Saude Publica. 2018 Aug 20;34(8):e00218717. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00218717.
2
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in Vocational Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review of the State of the Field.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类在职业康复中的应用:领域现状的范围综述》。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Jun;29(2):241-273. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9788-4.
3
Standardized reporting of functioning information on ICF-based common metrics.
基于 ICF 的通用指标的功能信息的标准化报告。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Feb;54(1):110-117. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04784-0. Epub 2017 May 23.
4
Linking of the quality of life in neurological disorders (Neuro-QoL) to the international classification of functioning, disability and health.神经系统疾病生活质量(Neuro-QoL)与国际功能、残疾和健康分类的关联。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Sep;26(9):2435-2448. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1590-9. Epub 2017 May 5.
5
Establishing score equivalence of the Functional Independence Measure motor scale and the Barthel Index, utilising the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and Rasch measurement theory.利用国际功能、残疾和健康分类以及 Rasch 测量理论,确立功能独立性测量运动量表和巴氏指数的评分等效性。
J Rehabil Med. 2017 May 16;49(5):416-422. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2225.
6
Linking Frailty Instruments to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A Systematic Review.将衰弱评估工具与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》相联系:一项系统综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Nov 1;17(11):1066.e1-1066.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.023. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
7
Outcome measures in older persons with acquired joint contractures: a systematic review and content analysis using the ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) as a reference.获得性关节挛缩老年人的结局指标:一项以国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)为参考的系统评价和内容分析
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Feb 9;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0213-6.
8
Toward the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Rehabilitation Set: A Minimal Generic Set of Domains for Rehabilitation as a Health Strategy.迈向《国际功能、残疾与健康分类》(ICF)康复组合:作为一项健康战略的康复领域最小通用集。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
9
Validation of the ICF Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation from the perspective of patients with spinal cord injury using focus groups.从脊髓损伤患者的角度出发,采用焦点小组法对国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)职业康复核心组合进行验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(4):337-45. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1041611. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
10
Comparison of physical activity questionnaires for the elderly with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)--an analysis of content.老年人身体活动问卷与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)的比较——内容分析
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 14;15:249. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1562-3.