Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Departamento de Política, Gestão e Saúde, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:51. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001804. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
OBJECTIVE To discuss the negative and positive concepts of liberty and postulate its interdependent and complementary relationship in the evaluation of public policy intersectoral actions, taking water fluoridation as a case. METHOD To describe scopes and limits regarding 1950s Isaiah Berlin's distinction, showing its validity in facing the harmful effects of an uncontrolled market economy and an autocratic political regime. RESULTS Both the rights that protect citizens against a powerful state and the rights that protect the state against powerful citizens were equally acknowledged as crucial. CONCLUSION We argued that, in a context in which negative and positive liberties are balanced, regulatory policies have double meaning. Thus, there should be a balance between the establishment of necessary rules for social protection and limits for them not to violate individuals' rights.
以水氟化为例,讨论自由的消极和积极概念,并假设它们在评价跨部门公共政策行动中的相互依存和互补关系。
描述 20 世纪 50 年代伊赛亚·伯林(Isaiah Berlin)区分的范围和限制,展示其在应对不受控制的市场经济和专制政治制度的有害影响方面的有效性。
保护公民免受强大国家侵害的权利和保护国家免受强大公民侵害的权利同样被认为是至关重要的。
我们认为,在平衡消极和积极自由的情况下,监管政策具有双重意义。因此,在为社会保护制定必要规则和为防止侵犯个人权利而对其加以限制之间应当保持平衡。