• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黏膜下生理盐水注射辅助冷圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠小息肉的随机对照研究。

Impact of submucosal saline solution injection for cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

Department of Pathology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):715-722.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.039
PMID:32492377
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) of small colorectal polyps is widely used. However, the technique is still troubled by insufficient resection depth, which may prevent precise pathologic evaluation. In this study, we investigated whether submucosal injection of saline solution helps to achieve deeper resection in CSP.

METHODS

The study was a single-center, prospective, randomized trial. Patients with small (3- to 10-mm diameter) nonpedunculated adenomatous or sessile serrated colorectal polyps were randomly allocated to either conventional CSP (C-CSP) or CSP with submucosal injection (CSP-SI). Primary outcome was the rate of complete muscularis mucosae (MM) resection, defined by the proportion of MM under the tumor more than 80% of the tumor's horizontal dimension. Secondary outcomes were the rates of negative lateral and vertical margins, fragmentation of resected specimens, conversion to hot snare mucosal resection, intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding, and perforation.

RESULTS

Two hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned to the CSP-SI (n = 107) or C-CSP (n = 107) group. The rate of complete MM resection was 43.9% in the CSP-SI group and 53.3% in the C-CSP group, a statistically insignificant difference. The rates of negative lateral margin and vertical margin (42.3% and 56.7%, respectively) in the CSP-SI group were significantly lower than those (58% and 76%) in the C-CSP group (P = .03 and P = .006, respectively). There was no polypectomy-related major bleeding or perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

Saline solution injection into the submucosa did not improve the resection depth of CSP of small colorectal polyps, and the method resulted in lower rates of negative lateral and vertical margins of resected lesions. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000037980.).

摘要

背景与目的

冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)广泛应用于小的结直肠息肉切除。然而,该技术仍存在切除深度不足的问题,这可能会影响精准的病理评估。本研究旨在探讨黏膜下注射生理盐水是否有助于 CSP 实现更深的切除。

方法

本研究为单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。纳入的患者为直径 3-10mm 的无蒂管状腺瘤或无蒂锯齿状息肉,随机分为 CSP 组(C-CSP)和黏膜下注射 CSP 组(CSP-SI)。主要终点为完全切除黏膜肌层(MM)的比例,定义为肿瘤下 MM 超过肿瘤水平直径 80%的比例。次要终点为阴性侧切缘和垂直切缘、标本碎裂、转为热圈套黏膜切除术、术中出血、迟发性出血和穿孔的发生率。

结果

共 214 例患者随机分配至 CSP-SI 组(n=107)或 C-CSP 组(n=107)。CSP-SI 组完全切除 MM 的比例为 43.9%,C-CSP 组为 53.3%,两组差异无统计学意义。CSP-SI 组的侧切缘和垂直切缘阴性率(分别为 42.3%和 56.7%)明显低于 C-CSP 组(分别为 58%和 76%)(P=0.03 和 P=0.006)。两组均无息肉切除相关的大出血或穿孔。

结论

黏膜下注射生理盐水并未改善 CSP 切除小的结直肠息肉的深度,该方法导致切除标本的侧切缘和垂直切缘阴性率更低。(临床试验注册号:UMIN000037980.)

相似文献

1
Impact of submucosal saline solution injection for cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled study.黏膜下生理盐水注射辅助冷圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠小息肉的随机对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):715-722.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 May 31.
2
Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.冷圈套息肉切除术和冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗 10-19mm 无蒂结直肠息肉的有效性和安全性:一项多中心观察性队列研究。
Endoscopy. 2023 Jul;55(7):627-635. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-9539. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
Impact of Submucosal Saline Injection During Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Sized 3-9 mm: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.黏膜下生理盐水注射在 3-9mm 大小结直肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术的应用效果:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;118(10):1848-1854. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002329. Epub 2023 May 19.
4
Factors Associated with possibly Inappropriate Histological Evaluation of Excised Specimens in Cold-snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps.小的结直肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术中切除标本组织学评估可能不恰当的相关因素。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2018 Mar;27(1):25-30. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.271.hst.
5
Resection depth and layer of cold snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection.冷圈套息肉切除术的切除深度和层次与内镜黏膜切除术比较。
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov;53(11):1171-1178. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1446-2. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
6
Submucosal Injection Using Epinephrine-Added Saline in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Shortens Time Required for Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study.在大肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术中使用添加肾上腺素的生理盐水进行黏膜下注射可缩短切除所需时间:一项随机对照研究。
Cureus. 2023 May 17;15(5):e39164. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39164. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Histopathologic vertical margin positivity in cold snare polypectomy and mucosal resection for sessile serrated lesions.广基锯齿状病变冷圈套息肉切除术和黏膜切除术的组织病理学垂直切缘阳性情况。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Aug;100(2):283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.029. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
8
Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.三种不同内镜方法治疗 6-20mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;55(3):362-370. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1732456. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
9
A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study).冷活检圈套切除术与热活检圈套切除术治疗 4-9mm 结直肠息肉的切除率比较:一项多中心随机对照试验(CRESCENT 研究)。
Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1950-1957. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Randomized controlled trial investigating use of submucosal injection of EverLift™ in rates of complete resection of non-pedunculated 4-9 mm polyps.一项随机对照试验,旨在研究非蒂息肉(4-9mm)黏膜下注射艾维力注射剂(EverLiftTM)对完全切除率的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jun;37(6):1273-1279. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04136-4. Epub 2022 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing underwater and conventional cold snare polypectomy for colorectal adenomas: Prospective randomized controlled trial.水下与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大肠腺瘤的比较:前瞻性随机对照试验。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Apr 8;13:a25490922. doi: 10.1055/a-2549-0922. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of contrast dye submucosal pre-lifting on cold snare resection of small polyps: an Italian randomized observational trial.对比染料黏膜下预抬举对小息肉冷圈套切除术的影响:一项意大利随机观察性试验
Clin Endosc. 2025 Mar;58(2):291-302. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.113. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
3
Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
冷圈套息肉切除术与冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析
Clin Endosc. 2024 Nov;57(6):747-758. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.081. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
4
Results of the COLDWATER randomized controlled trial: enhanced performance of underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps 5-10 mm, independent of endoscopist experience.冷水随机对照试验结果:水下冷圈套息肉切除术对5-10毫米大肠息肉的切除效果更佳,与内镜医师经验无关。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul-Aug;37(4):466-475. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0889. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
5
Cold sub-mucosal injection versus traditional cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冷黏膜下注射与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗小和微小结直肠息肉的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec;43(6):1111-1120. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01600-7. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
6
Submucosal Injection Using Epinephrine-Added Saline in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Shortens Time Required for Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study.在大肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术中使用添加肾上腺素的生理盐水进行黏膜下注射可缩短切除所需时间:一项随机对照研究。
Cureus. 2023 May 17;15(5):e39164. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39164. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Incomplete resection rates of 4- to 20-mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps when using wide-field cold snare resection with routine submucosal injection.使用常规黏膜下注射的宽视野冷圈套切除术时,4至20毫米无蒂结直肠息肉的不完全切除率
Endosc Int Open. 2023 May 17;11(5):E480-E489. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-2392. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Different endoscopic treatments for small colorectal polyps: A systematic review, pair-wise, and network meta-analysis.小的结直肠息肉的不同内镜治疗方法:一项系统评价、成对比较和网状Meta分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 6;10:1154411. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1154411. eCollection 2023.
9
Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3789-3795. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09875-1. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
10
Effect of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大肠小息肉的效果
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jul 6;10(19):6446-6455. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i19.6446.