Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020 Apr 1;91(4):326-331. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5435.2020.
Aerobatic flight is a challenge for the vestibular system, which is likely to lead to adaptive changes in the vestibular responses of pilots. We investigated whether aerobatic pilots, as individuals who experience intense vestibular stimulation, present modifications of the vestibular-ocular reflex, motion sickness susceptibility and intensity, visual vertical estimation, and visual dependence as compared to normal volunteers. To evaluate vestibulo-ocular reflexes, eye movements were recorded with videonystagmography while subjects were rotated on a rotatory chair with the axis of rotation being vertical (canal-ocular reflex) or inclined to 17° (otolith-ocular reflex). Motion sickness was evaluated after the rotatory test using the Graybiel diagnostic criteria. General motion sickness susceptibility and visual field dependence were also evaluated. Averaged data did not show significant difference in canal-ocular reflex and otolith ocular-reflex between groups. However, a significant asymmetry in otolith-driven ocular responses was found in pilots (CW 0.50 ± 1.21° · s vs. CCW 1.59 ± 1.12° · s), though visual vertical estimation was not altered in pilots and both groups were found field independent. Pilots were generally less susceptible to motion sickness (MSSQ scores: 2.52 ± 5.59 vs. 13.5 ± 11.36) and less affected by the nauseogenic stimulation (Graybiel diagnostic criteria 3.36 ± 3.81 vs. 8.39 ± 7.01). We did not observe the expected habituation in the group of aerobatic pilots. However, there was a significant asymmetry in the otolith-driven ocular responses in pilots, but not in the controls, which may result from the asymmetry in piloting protocols.
特技飞行对前庭系统是一个挑战,这可能导致飞行员前庭反应的适应性变化。我们研究了特技飞行员是否与正常志愿者相比,表现出前庭眼反射、晕动病易感性和强度、视觉垂直估计和视觉依赖的改变,因为他们经历了强烈的前庭刺激。为了评估前庭眼反射,当受试者在旋转椅上旋转时,使用视频眼动描记法记录眼动,旋转轴为垂直(管-眼反射)或倾斜 17°(耳石-眼反射)。旋转试验后,根据 Graybiel 诊断标准评估晕动病。还评估了一般晕动病易感性和视野依赖性。平均数据显示两组间管-眼反射和耳石眼反射无显著差异。然而,飞行员的耳石驱动眼反应存在显著的不对称性(CW 0.50 ± 1.21°·s 与 CCW 1.59 ± 1.12°·s),尽管飞行员的视觉垂直估计没有改变,并且两组均为视野独立。飞行员通常对晕动病的敏感性较低(MSSQ 评分:2.52 ± 5.59 与 13.5 ± 11.36),受致晕刺激的影响较小(Graybiel 诊断标准 3.36 ± 3.81 与 8.39 ± 7.01)。我们没有观察到特技飞行员组预期的习惯化。然而,飞行员的耳石驱动眼反应存在显著的不对称性,但对照组没有,这可能是由于飞行计划的不对称性所致。